Loading…

The Effects of Different Support Surfaces on Trunk and Lower Extremity Muscle Activityin a Back Bridging Exercise

[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of different support surfaces on muscle activity when healthy adults performed a the back bridging exercise. [Subjects] Twenty healthy adults participated in the present study. [Methods] The subjects performed a back bridging...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2012, Vol.24(10), pp.1025-1028
Main Authors: Kim, Hyunhee, Kim, Daehun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f5571c3b7e6f49935708bfc94f70419c63690ce6eacc8cd6e50903d3d0f1fd383
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f5571c3b7e6f49935708bfc94f70419c63690ce6eacc8cd6e50903d3d0f1fd383
container_end_page 1028
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1025
container_title Journal of Physical Therapy Science
container_volume 24
creator Kim, Hyunhee
Kim, Daehun
description [Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of different support surfaces on muscle activity when healthy adults performed a the back bridging exercise. [Subjects] Twenty healthy adults participated in the present study. [Methods] The subjects performed a back bridging exercise on different support surfaces (mat, balance pad, air cushion, and Swiss ball). Surface electrodes were used to record the electromyographic signal amplitudes of trunk muscles (erector spinae, obliquus externus abdominis, obliquus internus abdominis, and rectus abdominis) and lower extremity muscles (gluteus maximus, vastus medialis, semitendinosus, and soleus). The EMG data were normalized as a percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction, and were analyzed using 1 × 4 repeated measures analysis of variance. [Results] We found that the activities of the vastus medialis, semitendinosus, and soleus increased significantly when the exercise was performed on a Swiss ball, compared to their values during performance on a mat or a balance pad. No such difference was found for the gluteus maximus. [Conclusion] When the back bridging exercise was performed for stabilization, the changes in support surface did not affect the activity of the trunk muscles.
doi_str_mv 10.1589/jpts.24.1025
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291597543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1291597543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f5571c3b7e6f49935708bfc94f70419c63690ce6eacc8cd6e50903d3d0f1fd383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhxg_wkQPZ-iNO7GNblrZoEUhdzpY7GW-93U1S26H039fRVhWXeWc0j0ajh5DPnC250uZ0N-a0FPWSM6HekIXguq1UI5q3ZMEMV5USun1PPqS0Y0y0rNYL8rC5Q7ryHiEnOnj6LZQ-Yp_pzTSOQ5wzegdYtj3dxKm_p67v6Hp4xEhX_3LEQ8hP9OeUYI_0DHL4W-bQU0fPHdzT8xi6bei3hcUIIeFH8s67fcJPL3lC_nxfbS6uqvWvy-uLs3UFUteq8kq1HORti42vjZGqZfrWg6l9eZwbaGRjGGCDDkBD16BihslOdsxz30ktT8iX490xDg8TpmwPIQHu967HYUqWi6LEtKqWBf16RCEOKUX0dozh4OKT5czOZu1s1orazmYLfn3Edym7Lb7CLuZQJPwHz_XH782NFYwLy3X9ysCdixZ7-QzISYcm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291597543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Different Support Surfaces on Trunk and Lower Extremity Muscle Activityin a Back Bridging Exercise</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><creator>Kim, Hyunhee ; Kim, Daehun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunhee ; Kim, Daehun</creatorcontrib><description>[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of different support surfaces on muscle activity when healthy adults performed a the back bridging exercise. [Subjects] Twenty healthy adults participated in the present study. [Methods] The subjects performed a back bridging exercise on different support surfaces (mat, balance pad, air cushion, and Swiss ball). Surface electrodes were used to record the electromyographic signal amplitudes of trunk muscles (erector spinae, obliquus externus abdominis, obliquus internus abdominis, and rectus abdominis) and lower extremity muscles (gluteus maximus, vastus medialis, semitendinosus, and soleus). The EMG data were normalized as a percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction, and were analyzed using 1 × 4 repeated measures analysis of variance. [Results] We found that the activities of the vastus medialis, semitendinosus, and soleus increased significantly when the exercise was performed on a Swiss ball, compared to their values during performance on a mat or a balance pad. No such difference was found for the gluteus maximus. [Conclusion] When the back bridging exercise was performed for stabilization, the changes in support surface did not affect the activity of the trunk muscles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0915-5287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2187-5626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1589/jpts.24.1025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Back ; Bridging exercise ; EMG activity ; Exercise (programs) ; Legs ; Muscles ; Muscles (activity) ; Muscles (contractions) ; Muscles (exercise effects) ; Surfaces ; Trunk</subject><ispartof>Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2012, Vol.24(10), pp.1025-1028</ispartof><rights>2012 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f5571c3b7e6f49935708bfc94f70419c63690ce6eacc8cd6e50903d3d0f1fd383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f5571c3b7e6f49935708bfc94f70419c63690ce6eacc8cd6e50903d3d0f1fd383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1875,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Daehun</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Different Support Surfaces on Trunk and Lower Extremity Muscle Activityin a Back Bridging Exercise</title><title>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</title><addtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</addtitle><description>[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of different support surfaces on muscle activity when healthy adults performed a the back bridging exercise. [Subjects] Twenty healthy adults participated in the present study. [Methods] The subjects performed a back bridging exercise on different support surfaces (mat, balance pad, air cushion, and Swiss ball). Surface electrodes were used to record the electromyographic signal amplitudes of trunk muscles (erector spinae, obliquus externus abdominis, obliquus internus abdominis, and rectus abdominis) and lower extremity muscles (gluteus maximus, vastus medialis, semitendinosus, and soleus). The EMG data were normalized as a percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction, and were analyzed using 1 × 4 repeated measures analysis of variance. [Results] We found that the activities of the vastus medialis, semitendinosus, and soleus increased significantly when the exercise was performed on a Swiss ball, compared to their values during performance on a mat or a balance pad. No such difference was found for the gluteus maximus. [Conclusion] When the back bridging exercise was performed for stabilization, the changes in support surface did not affect the activity of the trunk muscles.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Back</subject><subject>Bridging exercise</subject><subject>EMG activity</subject><subject>Exercise (programs)</subject><subject>Legs</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Muscles (activity)</subject><subject>Muscles (contractions)</subject><subject>Muscles (exercise effects)</subject><subject>Surfaces</subject><subject>Trunk</subject><issn>0915-5287</issn><issn>2187-5626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhxg_wkQPZ-iNO7GNblrZoEUhdzpY7GW-93U1S26H039fRVhWXeWc0j0ajh5DPnC250uZ0N-a0FPWSM6HekIXguq1UI5q3ZMEMV5USun1PPqS0Y0y0rNYL8rC5Q7ryHiEnOnj6LZQ-Yp_pzTSOQ5wzegdYtj3dxKm_p67v6Hp4xEhX_3LEQ8hP9OeUYI_0DHL4W-bQU0fPHdzT8xi6bei3hcUIIeFH8s67fcJPL3lC_nxfbS6uqvWvy-uLs3UFUteq8kq1HORti42vjZGqZfrWg6l9eZwbaGRjGGCDDkBD16BihslOdsxz30ktT8iX490xDg8TpmwPIQHu967HYUqWi6LEtKqWBf16RCEOKUX0dozh4OKT5czOZu1s1orazmYLfn3Edym7Lb7CLuZQJPwHz_XH782NFYwLy3X9ysCdixZ7-QzISYcm</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyunhee</creator><creator>Kim, Daehun</creator><general>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>The Effects of Different Support Surfaces on Trunk and Lower Extremity Muscle Activityin a Back Bridging Exercise</title><author>Kim, Hyunhee ; Kim, Daehun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f5571c3b7e6f49935708bfc94f70419c63690ce6eacc8cd6e50903d3d0f1fd383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Back</topic><topic>Bridging exercise</topic><topic>EMG activity</topic><topic>Exercise (programs)</topic><topic>Legs</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Muscles (activity)</topic><topic>Muscles (contractions)</topic><topic>Muscles (exercise effects)</topic><topic>Surfaces</topic><topic>Trunk</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Daehun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyunhee</au><au>Kim, Daehun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Different Support Surfaces on Trunk and Lower Extremity Muscle Activityin a Back Bridging Exercise</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Physical Therapy Science</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1025</spage><epage>1028</epage><pages>1025-1028</pages><issn>0915-5287</issn><eissn>2187-5626</eissn><abstract>[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of different support surfaces on muscle activity when healthy adults performed a the back bridging exercise. [Subjects] Twenty healthy adults participated in the present study. [Methods] The subjects performed a back bridging exercise on different support surfaces (mat, balance pad, air cushion, and Swiss ball). Surface electrodes were used to record the electromyographic signal amplitudes of trunk muscles (erector spinae, obliquus externus abdominis, obliquus internus abdominis, and rectus abdominis) and lower extremity muscles (gluteus maximus, vastus medialis, semitendinosus, and soleus). The EMG data were normalized as a percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction, and were analyzed using 1 × 4 repeated measures analysis of variance. [Results] We found that the activities of the vastus medialis, semitendinosus, and soleus increased significantly when the exercise was performed on a Swiss ball, compared to their values during performance on a mat or a balance pad. No such difference was found for the gluteus maximus. [Conclusion] When the back bridging exercise was performed for stabilization, the changes in support surface did not affect the activity of the trunk muscles.</abstract><pub>The Society of Physical Therapy Science</pub><doi>10.1589/jpts.24.1025</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0915-5287
ispartof Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2012, Vol.24(10), pp.1025-1028
issn 0915-5287
2187-5626
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1291597543
source J-STAGE Free
subjects Analysis
Back
Bridging exercise
EMG activity
Exercise (programs)
Legs
Muscles
Muscles (activity)
Muscles (contractions)
Muscles (exercise effects)
Surfaces
Trunk
title The Effects of Different Support Surfaces on Trunk and Lower Extremity Muscle Activityin a Back Bridging Exercise
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A21%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Different%20Support%20Surfaces%20on%20Trunk%20and%20Lower%20Extremity%20Muscle%20Activityin%20a%20Back%20Bridging%20Exercise&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Physical%20Therapy%20Science&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyunhee&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1025&rft.epage=1028&rft.pages=1025-1028&rft.issn=0915-5287&rft.eissn=2187-5626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1589/jpts.24.1025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1291597543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3845-f5571c3b7e6f49935708bfc94f70419c63690ce6eacc8cd6e50903d3d0f1fd383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291597543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true