Loading…

Genotype‐Based Association Analysis Using Discordant Pairs: A Penetrance Odds Ratio Approach

Summary Genotypic counts of paired relatives discordant for a complex late‐onset disease are often used to test for genetic association. The power of the various statistical test options, when data on covariates are unavailable, has been the focus of recent research. Comparison of the Cochran‐Armita...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of human genetics 2013-03, Vol.77 (2), p.137-146
Main Authors: Grover, Vaneeta K., Cole, David E.C., Hamilton, David C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3462-535d75a3aaf3f10516895b4327aaee6c9916086e2a7a68bef8ffaf889fc7f3e83
container_end_page 146
container_issue 2
container_start_page 137
container_title Annals of human genetics
container_volume 77
creator Grover, Vaneeta K.
Cole, David E.C.
Hamilton, David C.
description Summary Genotypic counts of paired relatives discordant for a complex late‐onset disease are often used to test for genetic association. The power of the various statistical test options, when data on covariates are unavailable, has been the focus of recent research. Comparison of the Cochran‐Armitage, Bhapkar, and McNemar tests indicates that none is superior to the others in all cases. Using an alternative approach, we found that the theoretical genotypic frequencies of the discordant pairs depend only on the penetrance odds ratios, after conditioning. These odds ratios can be estimated by maximizing a product binomial likelihood and provide insight into the mode of inheritance. We identified cases where exact maximum likelihood (ML) estimates can be explicitly obtained. This approach led us to two tests for association which depend on likelihood ratio (LR) or score statistics. We quantified the power of these tests analytically and examined their performance through simulation. We explored the utility of these tests with an example from the literature—the association between complement factor H (CFH) polymorphisms and age‐related macular degeneration. The LR and Score tests serve as simple and effective ways of interpreting paired case‐control data sets.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ahg.12002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315624803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1315624803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3462-535d75a3aaf3f10516895b4327aaee6c9916086e2a7a68bef8ffaf889fc7f3e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0btOwzAUBmALgaBcBl4AWWKBIdSXxHHYwq0gIbVCdCU6TY5LUJoUOxXqxiPwjDwJhhQGJIQXL9_5bZ2fkH3OTrg_fXicnnDBmFgjPR6qJOCaJeukxxiTQagZ2yLbzj0xxoUO5SbZElIqoTXvkYcB1k27nOP769sZOCxo6lyTl9CWTU3TGqqlKx0du7Ke0ovS5Y0toG7pCErrTmlKR1hja6HOkQ6LwtG7z0mazue2gfxxl2wYqBzure4dMr66vD-_Dm6Hg5vz9DbIZahEEMmoiCOQAEYaziKudBJNQiliAESVJwlXTCsUEIPSEzTaGDBaJyaPjUQtd8hRl-uffV6ga7OZ_ytWFdTYLFzGJY-U8KuQ_1OhkzBWHT38RZ-ahfU7-VI6CmMpI6-OO5XbxjmLJpvbcgZ2mXGWffaT-X6yr368PVglLiYzLH7kdyEe9DvwUla4_DspS68HXeQHCTyYxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1288547335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genotype‐Based Association Analysis Using Discordant Pairs: A Penetrance Odds Ratio Approach</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Grover, Vaneeta K. ; Cole, David E.C. ; Hamilton, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grover, Vaneeta K. ; Cole, David E.C. ; Hamilton, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Genotypic counts of paired relatives discordant for a complex late‐onset disease are often used to test for genetic association. The power of the various statistical test options, when data on covariates are unavailable, has been the focus of recent research. Comparison of the Cochran‐Armitage, Bhapkar, and McNemar tests indicates that none is superior to the others in all cases. Using an alternative approach, we found that the theoretical genotypic frequencies of the discordant pairs depend only on the penetrance odds ratios, after conditioning. These odds ratios can be estimated by maximizing a product binomial likelihood and provide insight into the mode of inheritance. We identified cases where exact maximum likelihood (ML) estimates can be explicitly obtained. This approach led us to two tests for association which depend on likelihood ratio (LR) or score statistics. We quantified the power of these tests analytically and examined their performance through simulation. We explored the utility of these tests with an example from the literature—the association between complement factor H (CFH) polymorphisms and age‐related macular degeneration. The LR and Score tests serve as simple and effective ways of interpreting paired case‐control data sets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ahg.12002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23362881</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANHGAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; discordant relative pairs ; Genetic association ; Genetic Association Studies - methods ; Genotype ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Humans ; Macular degeneration ; Odds Ratio ; odds ratios ; Penetrance ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Annals of human genetics, 2013-03, Vol.77 (2), p.137-146</ispartof><rights>2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/University College London</rights><rights>2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/University College London.</rights><rights>Annals of Human Genetics © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/University College London</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3462-535d75a3aaf3f10516895b4327aaee6c9916086e2a7a68bef8ffaf889fc7f3e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23362881$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grover, Vaneeta K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, David E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Genotype‐Based Association Analysis Using Discordant Pairs: A Penetrance Odds Ratio Approach</title><title>Annals of human genetics</title><addtitle>Ann Hum Genet</addtitle><description>Summary Genotypic counts of paired relatives discordant for a complex late‐onset disease are often used to test for genetic association. The power of the various statistical test options, when data on covariates are unavailable, has been the focus of recent research. Comparison of the Cochran‐Armitage, Bhapkar, and McNemar tests indicates that none is superior to the others in all cases. Using an alternative approach, we found that the theoretical genotypic frequencies of the discordant pairs depend only on the penetrance odds ratios, after conditioning. These odds ratios can be estimated by maximizing a product binomial likelihood and provide insight into the mode of inheritance. We identified cases where exact maximum likelihood (ML) estimates can be explicitly obtained. This approach led us to two tests for association which depend on likelihood ratio (LR) or score statistics. We quantified the power of these tests analytically and examined their performance through simulation. We explored the utility of these tests with an example from the literature—the association between complement factor H (CFH) polymorphisms and age‐related macular degeneration. The LR and Score tests serve as simple and effective ways of interpreting paired case‐control data sets.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>discordant relative pairs</subject><subject>Genetic association</subject><subject>Genetic Association Studies - methods</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macular degeneration</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>odds ratios</subject><subject>Penetrance</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0003-4800</issn><issn>1469-1809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0btOwzAUBmALgaBcBl4AWWKBIdSXxHHYwq0gIbVCdCU6TY5LUJoUOxXqxiPwjDwJhhQGJIQXL9_5bZ2fkH3OTrg_fXicnnDBmFgjPR6qJOCaJeukxxiTQagZ2yLbzj0xxoUO5SbZElIqoTXvkYcB1k27nOP769sZOCxo6lyTl9CWTU3TGqqlKx0du7Ke0ovS5Y0toG7pCErrTmlKR1hja6HOkQ6LwtG7z0mazue2gfxxl2wYqBzure4dMr66vD-_Dm6Hg5vz9DbIZahEEMmoiCOQAEYaziKudBJNQiliAESVJwlXTCsUEIPSEzTaGDBaJyaPjUQtd8hRl-uffV6ga7OZ_ytWFdTYLFzGJY-U8KuQ_1OhkzBWHT38RZ-ahfU7-VI6CmMpI6-OO5XbxjmLJpvbcgZ2mXGWffaT-X6yr368PVglLiYzLH7kdyEe9DvwUla4_DspS68HXeQHCTyYxQ</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Grover, Vaneeta K.</creator><creator>Cole, David E.C.</creator><creator>Hamilton, David C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Genotype‐Based Association Analysis Using Discordant Pairs: A Penetrance Odds Ratio Approach</title><author>Grover, Vaneeta K. ; Cole, David E.C. ; Hamilton, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3462-535d75a3aaf3f10516895b4327aaee6c9916086e2a7a68bef8ffaf889fc7f3e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>discordant relative pairs</topic><topic>Genetic association</topic><topic>Genetic Association Studies - methods</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macular degeneration</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>odds ratios</topic><topic>Penetrance</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grover, Vaneeta K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, David E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of human genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grover, Vaneeta K.</au><au>Cole, David E.C.</au><au>Hamilton, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genotype‐Based Association Analysis Using Discordant Pairs: A Penetrance Odds Ratio Approach</atitle><jtitle>Annals of human genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Hum Genet</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>137-146</pages><issn>0003-4800</issn><eissn>1469-1809</eissn><coden>ANHGAA</coden><abstract>Summary Genotypic counts of paired relatives discordant for a complex late‐onset disease are often used to test for genetic association. The power of the various statistical test options, when data on covariates are unavailable, has been the focus of recent research. Comparison of the Cochran‐Armitage, Bhapkar, and McNemar tests indicates that none is superior to the others in all cases. Using an alternative approach, we found that the theoretical genotypic frequencies of the discordant pairs depend only on the penetrance odds ratios, after conditioning. These odds ratios can be estimated by maximizing a product binomial likelihood and provide insight into the mode of inheritance. We identified cases where exact maximum likelihood (ML) estimates can be explicitly obtained. This approach led us to two tests for association which depend on likelihood ratio (LR) or score statistics. We quantified the power of these tests analytically and examined their performance through simulation. We explored the utility of these tests with an example from the literature—the association between complement factor H (CFH) polymorphisms and age‐related macular degeneration. The LR and Score tests serve as simple and effective ways of interpreting paired case‐control data sets.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>23362881</pmid><doi>10.1111/ahg.12002</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4800
ispartof Annals of human genetics, 2013-03, Vol.77 (2), p.137-146
issn 0003-4800
1469-1809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315624803
source Wiley
subjects Case-Control Studies
discordant relative pairs
Genetic association
Genetic Association Studies - methods
Genotype
Genotype & phenotype
Humans
Macular degeneration
Odds Ratio
odds ratios
Penetrance
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Studies
title Genotype‐Based Association Analysis Using Discordant Pairs: A Penetrance Odds Ratio Approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A50%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genotype%E2%80%90Based%20Association%20Analysis%20Using%20Discordant%20Pairs:%20A%20Penetrance%20Odds%20Ratio%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20human%20genetics&rft.au=Grover,%20Vaneeta%20K.&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=137-146&rft.issn=0003-4800&rft.eissn=1469-1809&rft.coden=ANHGAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ahg.12002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1315624803%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3462-535d75a3aaf3f10516895b4327aaee6c9916086e2a7a68bef8ffaf889fc7f3e83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1288547335&rft_id=info:pmid/23362881&rfr_iscdi=true