Loading…
Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties
In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Fibers and polymers 2008-02, Vol.9 (1), p.87-91 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3 |
container_end_page | 91 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | Fibers and polymers |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Ureyen, Mustafa E Gurkan, Pelin |
description | In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression analysis. Yarn count, twist and roving properties were selected as input variables as they give significant influence on yarn properties. In experimental part, a total of 180 cotton ring spun yarns were produced using 15 different blends. The four yarn counts and three twist multipliers were chosen within the range of Ne 20–35 and
α
e
3.8–4.6 respectively. After measuring yarn tenacity and breaking elongation, evaluations of data were performed by using ANN. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis results and coefficient of multiple determination (R
2
) values of ANN and regression models were compared. Our results show that ANN is more powerful tool than the regression models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12221-008-0014-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315646790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1315646790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQhU1ooGmaB-hOdNWNb_VnWV6WS5sGAs0iXQtZHgclvpI7Y1PyKn3a6MaF_kAWw4zQd84Inap6J_hOcN5-JCGlFDXntpTQtT6pzoRtm3Jq5KsyS9nVneja19UbonvOjZCtOqt-7fNh9hgpJ5ZH5nGJYwzRTyzBis9t-Znxgfk0sCkm8MgQ7hCIYpEc8gATsTEjmxGGGJa4GWFMd4zmNbFHj6lc5hmKN9COXe3YzT_sM7FAojjBX-Tb6nT0E8HF735eff_y-Xb_tb7-dnm1_3RdB6XtUrdBeQ2NbTpjvO2D5nLspeV87AeteG-UHUzb26a1Kvh-9KFRXnipOs19b0CdVx8237L6xwq0uEOkANPkE-SVnFCiMdq0HS_o-__Q-7xiKq9z1gpuuOlMgcQGBcxECKObMR48PjrB3TEst4XlSljuGJbTRSM3Dc3HnwP8Y_yy6Alvd5oc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881060696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Ureyen, Mustafa E ; Gurkan, Pelin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ureyen, Mustafa E ; Gurkan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><description>In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression analysis. Yarn count, twist and roving properties were selected as input variables as they give significant influence on yarn properties. In experimental part, a total of 180 cotton ring spun yarns were produced using 15 different blends. The four yarn counts and three twist multipliers were chosen within the range of Ne 20–35 and
α
e
3.8–4.6 respectively. After measuring yarn tenacity and breaking elongation, evaluations of data were performed by using ANN. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis results and coefficient of multiple determination (R
2
) values of ANN and regression models were compared. Our results show that ANN is more powerful tool than the regression models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1229-9197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-0052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12221-008-0014-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: The Korean Fiber Society</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Blends ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Fibers ; Learning theory ; Mathematical models ; Neural networks ; Polymer Sciences ; Regression ; Regression analysis ; Studies ; Yarns</subject><ispartof>Fibers and polymers, 2008-02, Vol.9 (1), p.87-91</ispartof><rights>The Korean Fiber Society 2008</rights><rights>2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ureyen, Mustafa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurkan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties</title><title>Fibers and polymers</title><addtitle>Fibers Polym</addtitle><description>In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression analysis. Yarn count, twist and roving properties were selected as input variables as they give significant influence on yarn properties. In experimental part, a total of 180 cotton ring spun yarns were produced using 15 different blends. The four yarn counts and three twist multipliers were chosen within the range of Ne 20–35 and
α
e
3.8–4.6 respectively. After measuring yarn tenacity and breaking elongation, evaluations of data were performed by using ANN. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis results and coefficient of multiple determination (R
2
) values of ANN and regression models were compared. Our results show that ANN is more powerful tool than the regression models.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Blends</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Polymer Sciences</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Yarns</subject><issn>1229-9197</issn><issn>1875-0052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQhU1ooGmaB-hOdNWNb_VnWV6WS5sGAs0iXQtZHgclvpI7Y1PyKn3a6MaF_kAWw4zQd84Inap6J_hOcN5-JCGlFDXntpTQtT6pzoRtm3Jq5KsyS9nVneja19UbonvOjZCtOqt-7fNh9hgpJ5ZH5nGJYwzRTyzBis9t-Znxgfk0sCkm8MgQ7hCIYpEc8gATsTEjmxGGGJa4GWFMd4zmNbFHj6lc5hmKN9COXe3YzT_sM7FAojjBX-Tb6nT0E8HF735eff_y-Xb_tb7-dnm1_3RdB6XtUrdBeQ2NbTpjvO2D5nLspeV87AeteG-UHUzb26a1Kvh-9KFRXnipOs19b0CdVx8237L6xwq0uEOkANPkE-SVnFCiMdq0HS_o-__Q-7xiKq9z1gpuuOlMgcQGBcxECKObMR48PjrB3TEst4XlSljuGJbTRSM3Dc3HnwP8Y_yy6Alvd5oc</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Ureyen, Mustafa E</creator><creator>Gurkan, Pelin</creator><general>The Korean Fiber Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties</title><author>Ureyen, Mustafa E ; Gurkan, Pelin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Blends</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Polymer Sciences</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Yarns</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ureyen, Mustafa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurkan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Fibers and polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ureyen, Mustafa E</au><au>Gurkan, Pelin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties</atitle><jtitle>Fibers and polymers</jtitle><stitle>Fibers Polym</stitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>87-91</pages><issn>1229-9197</issn><eissn>1875-0052</eissn><abstract>In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression analysis. Yarn count, twist and roving properties were selected as input variables as they give significant influence on yarn properties. In experimental part, a total of 180 cotton ring spun yarns were produced using 15 different blends. The four yarn counts and three twist multipliers were chosen within the range of Ne 20–35 and
α
e
3.8–4.6 respectively. After measuring yarn tenacity and breaking elongation, evaluations of data were performed by using ANN. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis results and coefficient of multiple determination (R
2
) values of ANN and regression models were compared. Our results show that ANN is more powerful tool than the regression models.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>The Korean Fiber Society</pub><doi>10.1007/s12221-008-0014-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1229-9197 |
ispartof | Fibers and polymers, 2008-02, Vol.9 (1), p.87-91 |
issn | 1229-9197 1875-0052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315646790 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Artificial neural networks Blends Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Fibers Learning theory Mathematical models Neural networks Polymer Sciences Regression Regression analysis Studies Yarns |
title | Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A01%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20artificial%20neural%20network%20and%20linear%20regression%20models%20for%20prediction%20of%20ring%20spun%20yarn%20properties.%20I.%20Prediction%20of%20yarn%20tensile%20properties&rft.jtitle=Fibers%20and%20polymers&rft.au=Ureyen,%20Mustafa%20E&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=87-91&rft.issn=1229-9197&rft.eissn=1875-0052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12221-008-0014-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1315646790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881060696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |