Loading…

Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties

In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fibers and polymers 2008-02, Vol.9 (1), p.87-91
Main Authors: Ureyen, Mustafa E, Gurkan, Pelin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3
container_end_page 91
container_issue 1
container_start_page 87
container_title Fibers and polymers
container_volume 9
creator Ureyen, Mustafa E
Gurkan, Pelin
description In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression analysis. Yarn count, twist and roving properties were selected as input variables as they give significant influence on yarn properties. In experimental part, a total of 180 cotton ring spun yarns were produced using 15 different blends. The four yarn counts and three twist multipliers were chosen within the range of Ne 20–35 and α e 3.8–4.6 respectively. After measuring yarn tenacity and breaking elongation, evaluations of data were performed by using ANN. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis results and coefficient of multiple determination (R 2 ) values of ANN and regression models were compared. Our results show that ANN is more powerful tool than the regression models.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12221-008-0014-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315646790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1315646790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQhU1ooGmaB-hOdNWNb_VnWV6WS5sGAs0iXQtZHgclvpI7Y1PyKn3a6MaF_kAWw4zQd84Inap6J_hOcN5-JCGlFDXntpTQtT6pzoRtm3Jq5KsyS9nVneja19UbonvOjZCtOqt-7fNh9hgpJ5ZH5nGJYwzRTyzBis9t-Znxgfk0sCkm8MgQ7hCIYpEc8gATsTEjmxGGGJa4GWFMd4zmNbFHj6lc5hmKN9COXe3YzT_sM7FAojjBX-Tb6nT0E8HF735eff_y-Xb_tb7-dnm1_3RdB6XtUrdBeQ2NbTpjvO2D5nLspeV87AeteG-UHUzb26a1Kvh-9KFRXnipOs19b0CdVx8237L6xwq0uEOkANPkE-SVnFCiMdq0HS_o-__Q-7xiKq9z1gpuuOlMgcQGBcxECKObMR48PjrB3TEst4XlSljuGJbTRSM3Dc3HnwP8Y_yy6Alvd5oc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881060696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Ureyen, Mustafa E ; Gurkan, Pelin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ureyen, Mustafa E ; Gurkan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><description>In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression analysis. Yarn count, twist and roving properties were selected as input variables as they give significant influence on yarn properties. In experimental part, a total of 180 cotton ring spun yarns were produced using 15 different blends. The four yarn counts and three twist multipliers were chosen within the range of Ne 20–35 and α e 3.8–4.6 respectively. After measuring yarn tenacity and breaking elongation, evaluations of data were performed by using ANN. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis results and coefficient of multiple determination (R 2 ) values of ANN and regression models were compared. Our results show that ANN is more powerful tool than the regression models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1229-9197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-0052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12221-008-0014-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: The Korean Fiber Society</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Blends ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Fibers ; Learning theory ; Mathematical models ; Neural networks ; Polymer Sciences ; Regression ; Regression analysis ; Studies ; Yarns</subject><ispartof>Fibers and polymers, 2008-02, Vol.9 (1), p.87-91</ispartof><rights>The Korean Fiber Society 2008</rights><rights>2008</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ureyen, Mustafa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurkan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties</title><title>Fibers and polymers</title><addtitle>Fibers Polym</addtitle><description>In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression analysis. Yarn count, twist and roving properties were selected as input variables as they give significant influence on yarn properties. In experimental part, a total of 180 cotton ring spun yarns were produced using 15 different blends. The four yarn counts and three twist multipliers were chosen within the range of Ne 20–35 and α e 3.8–4.6 respectively. After measuring yarn tenacity and breaking elongation, evaluations of data were performed by using ANN. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis results and coefficient of multiple determination (R 2 ) values of ANN and regression models were compared. Our results show that ANN is more powerful tool than the regression models.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Blends</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Polymer Sciences</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Yarns</subject><issn>1229-9197</issn><issn>1875-0052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQhU1ooGmaB-hOdNWNb_VnWV6WS5sGAs0iXQtZHgclvpI7Y1PyKn3a6MaF_kAWw4zQd84Inap6J_hOcN5-JCGlFDXntpTQtT6pzoRtm3Jq5KsyS9nVneja19UbonvOjZCtOqt-7fNh9hgpJ5ZH5nGJYwzRTyzBis9t-Znxgfk0sCkm8MgQ7hCIYpEc8gATsTEjmxGGGJa4GWFMd4zmNbFHj6lc5hmKN9COXe3YzT_sM7FAojjBX-Tb6nT0E8HF735eff_y-Xb_tb7-dnm1_3RdB6XtUrdBeQ2NbTpjvO2D5nLspeV87AeteG-UHUzb26a1Kvh-9KFRXnipOs19b0CdVx8237L6xwq0uEOkANPkE-SVnFCiMdq0HS_o-__Q-7xiKq9z1gpuuOlMgcQGBcxECKObMR48PjrB3TEst4XlSljuGJbTRSM3Dc3HnwP8Y_yy6Alvd5oc</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Ureyen, Mustafa E</creator><creator>Gurkan, Pelin</creator><general>The Korean Fiber Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties</title><author>Ureyen, Mustafa E ; Gurkan, Pelin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Blends</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Polymer Sciences</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Yarns</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ureyen, Mustafa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurkan, Pelin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Fibers and polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ureyen, Mustafa E</au><au>Gurkan, Pelin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties</atitle><jtitle>Fibers and polymers</jtitle><stitle>Fibers Polym</stitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>87-91</pages><issn>1229-9197</issn><eissn>1875-0052</eissn><abstract>In this study artificial neural network (ANN) models have been designed to predict the ring cotton yarn properties from the fiber properties measured on HVI (high volume instrument) system and the performance of ANN models have been compared with our previous statistical models based on regression analysis. Yarn count, twist and roving properties were selected as input variables as they give significant influence on yarn properties. In experimental part, a total of 180 cotton ring spun yarns were produced using 15 different blends. The four yarn counts and three twist multipliers were chosen within the range of Ne 20–35 and α e 3.8–4.6 respectively. After measuring yarn tenacity and breaking elongation, evaluations of data were performed by using ANN. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis results and coefficient of multiple determination (R 2 ) values of ANN and regression models were compared. Our results show that ANN is more powerful tool than the regression models.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>The Korean Fiber Society</pub><doi>10.1007/s12221-008-0014-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1229-9197
ispartof Fibers and polymers, 2008-02, Vol.9 (1), p.87-91
issn 1229-9197
1875-0052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1315646790
source Springer Link
subjects Artificial neural networks
Blends
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Fibers
Learning theory
Mathematical models
Neural networks
Polymer Sciences
Regression
Regression analysis
Studies
Yarns
title Comparison of artificial neural network and linear regression models for prediction of ring spun yarn properties. I. Prediction of yarn tensile properties
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A01%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20artificial%20neural%20network%20and%20linear%20regression%20models%20for%20prediction%20of%20ring%20spun%20yarn%20properties.%20I.%20Prediction%20of%20yarn%20tensile%20properties&rft.jtitle=Fibers%20and%20polymers&rft.au=Ureyen,%20Mustafa%20E&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=87-91&rft.issn=1229-9197&rft.eissn=1875-0052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12221-008-0014-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1315646790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7c3a4e585966a8bc402fb2800fbd430b638d67b85783cabfac53a1a23940ab6e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881060696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true