Loading…

Maladaptively High and Low Openness: The Case for Experiential Permeability

The domain of Openness within the Five‐Factor Model (FFM) has received inconsistent support as a source for maladaptive personality functioning, at least when the latter is confined to the disorders of personality included within the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Stati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality 2012-12, Vol.80 (6), p.1641-1668
Main Authors: Piedmont, Ralph L., Sherman, Martin F., Sherman, Nancy C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The domain of Openness within the Five‐Factor Model (FFM) has received inconsistent support as a source for maladaptive personality functioning, at least when the latter is confined to the disorders of personality included within the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐IV‐TR; APA, ). However, an advantage of the FFM relative to the DSM‐IV‐TR is that the former was developed to provide a reasonably comprehensive description of general personality structure. Rather than suggest that the FFM is inadequate because the DSM‐IV‐TR lacks much representation of Openness, it might be just as reasonable to suggest that the DSM‐IV‐TR is inadequate because it lacks an adequate representation of maladaptive variants of both high and low Openness. This article discusses the development and validation of a measure of these maladaptive variants, the Experiential Permeability Inventory.
ISSN:0022-3506
1467-6494
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00777.x