Loading…
Maladaptively High and Low Openness: The Case for Experiential Permeability
The domain of Openness within the Five‐Factor Model (FFM) has received inconsistent support as a source for maladaptive personality functioning, at least when the latter is confined to the disorders of personality included within the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Stati...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of personality 2012-12, Vol.80 (6), p.1641-1668 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The domain of Openness within the Five‐Factor Model (FFM) has received inconsistent support as a source for maladaptive personality functioning, at least when the latter is confined to the disorders of personality included within the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐IV‐TR; APA, ). However, an advantage of the FFM relative to the DSM‐IV‐TR is that the former was developed to provide a reasonably comprehensive description of general personality structure. Rather than suggest that the FFM is inadequate because the DSM‐IV‐TR lacks much representation of Openness, it might be just as reasonable to suggest that the DSM‐IV‐TR is inadequate because it lacks an adequate representation of maladaptive variants of both high and low Openness. This article discusses the development and validation of a measure of these maladaptive variants, the Experiential Permeability Inventory. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3506 1467-6494 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00777.x |