Cell Cycle Synchronization of Skin Fibroblast Cells in Four Species of Family Felidae

• Published in: Reproduction in domestic animals 2013-04, Vol.48 (2), p.305-310
• Main Authors: Wittayarat, M, Thongphakdee, A, Saikhun, K, Chatdarong, K, Otoi, T, Techakumphu, M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal populations; Animal reproduction; Animals; Cats; Cell cycle; Cell Cycle - physiology; Culture Media, Serum-Free - pharmacology; Felidae - classification; Felidae - physiology; Fibroblasts - cytology; Fibroblasts - drug effects; Fibroblasts - metabolism; Protein Kinase Inhibitors - pharmacology; Purines - pharmacology; Species Specificity
• ISSN: 0936-6768; 1439-0531
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02149.x

Contents This study was examined whether the species of felid affects synchronization accuracy at the G0/G1 stage of the cell cycle and the occurrence of apoptosis by different protocols, such as serum starvation, confluent and roscovitine treatment. Skin fibroblast cells were obtained from the Asian golden cat, marbled cat, leopard and Siamese cat. The cells from each animal were treated with either serum starvation for 1–5 days, cell confluency‐contact inhibition for 5 days or roscovitine at various concentrations (7.5–30 μm). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that serum starvation for 3 days provided the highest cell population arrested at the G0/G1 stage, irrespective of the felid species. In all species, 100% confluency gave a significantly higher percentage of cells arrested at the G0/G1 stage compared with the non‐treated control cells. The effects of roscovitine treatment and the appropriate concentration on the rates of G0/G1 cells differed among the felid species. Serum starvation for more than 4 days in the marbled cat and Siamese cat and roscovitine treatment with 30 μm in the Asian golden cat and leopard increased the rates of apoptosis. In conclusion, different felid species responded to different methods of cell cycle synchronization. Asian golden cat and Siamese cat fibroblast cells were successfully synchronized to G0/G1 stage using the serum starvation and roscovitine treatment, whereas only confluency‐contact inhibition treatment induced cell synchronization in the leopard. Moreover, these three methods did not successfully induce cell synchronization of the marbled cat. These findings may be valuable for preparing their donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer in the future.