Loading…

Comparative pharmacokinetics of a tumour-targeting therapy candidate rh-IFNα2a-NGR with rh-IFNα2a administered intravenously in mice and rats

Objectives rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR is a promising anti‐tumor candidate. The aim of present study was to compare pharmacokinetics of rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR with rh‐IFNα2a. Methods Pharmacokinetics and elimination were investigated after intravenous administration to mice and rats. Compared tumor and tissue distribution...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology 2013-04, Vol.65 (4), p.574-581
Main Authors: Wang, Xue-Xi, Lu, Li, Song, Chun-Li, Qian, Wei-Na, Zhang, Sheng-Yan, Zhang, Ying-Qi, Wu, Yong-Jie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR is a promising anti‐tumor candidate. The aim of present study was to compare pharmacokinetics of rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR with rh‐IFNα2a. Methods Pharmacokinetics and elimination were investigated after intravenous administration to mice and rats. Compared tumor and tissue distribution profiles between rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR and rh‐IFNα2a were illustrated in the tumor transplanted mice of SP2/0 myeloma. Double antibody sandwich ELISA method was used to assess the level of both rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR and rh‐IFNα2a in serum, tissue, bile and urine. Key findings After a single intravenous administration, the pharmacokinetic characters of rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR and rh‐IFNα2a were described using a two‐compartment model. No significant differences were observed between the two drugs in pharmacokinetic and elimination data. However, the concentration of rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR in tumor was 5.34 times and 1.52 times as high as that of rh‐IFNα2a at 0.5 h (P 
ISSN:0022-3573
2042-7158
DOI:10.1111/jphp.12022