Loading…
Comparative pharmacokinetics of a tumour-targeting therapy candidate rh-IFNα2a-NGR with rh-IFNα2a administered intravenously in mice and rats
Objectives rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR is a promising anti‐tumor candidate. The aim of present study was to compare pharmacokinetics of rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR with rh‐IFNα2a. Methods Pharmacokinetics and elimination were investigated after intravenous administration to mice and rats. Compared tumor and tissue distribution...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology 2013-04, Vol.65 (4), p.574-581 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives
rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR is a promising anti‐tumor candidate. The aim of present study was to compare pharmacokinetics of rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR with rh‐IFNα2a.
Methods
Pharmacokinetics and elimination were investigated after intravenous administration to mice and rats. Compared tumor and tissue distribution profiles between rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR and rh‐IFNα2a were illustrated in the tumor transplanted mice of SP2/0 myeloma. Double antibody sandwich ELISA method was used to assess the level of both rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR and rh‐IFNα2a in serum, tissue, bile and urine.
Key findings
After a single intravenous administration, the pharmacokinetic characters of rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR and rh‐IFNα2a were described using a two‐compartment model. No significant differences were observed between the two drugs in pharmacokinetic and elimination data. However, the concentration of rh‐IFNα2a‐NGR in tumor was 5.34 times and 1.52 times as high as that of rh‐IFNα2a at 0.5 h (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3573 2042-7158 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jphp.12022 |