Loading…
Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health
Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze...
Saved in:
Published in: | Personality & social psychology bulletin 2013-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-469 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3 |
container_end_page | 469 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 456 |
container_title | Personality & social psychology bulletin |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Frost, David M. Forrester, Cat |
description | Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals’ actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0146167213476896 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317853166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0146167213476896</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1317853166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1P3DAQxa0KVBbae0_IEhcOG7Djj0m4tUsLSKBKtFWPkeMdg5HjhDgrxH9fbxcQQuI0kt9v3vjpEfKFsyPOAY4Zl5prKLmQoKtafyAzrlRZgBRii8zWcrHWd8huSneMMall-ZHslEIyAAkz8rAIfcKIKdFTn-yIg4nWY6I-0uu-M3Hyll5jMJPvY7r1QzqhF90QvN28UNePL7oJ9C-GUHxDH2_m9NdkWh_89DinJi7pFcYpE-downT7iWw7ExJ-fpp75M-P778X58Xlz7OLxdfLwkglpwIdlMqAtYyzegmyrnXZggYBrauqCpRyNThjlsqWzHFmctjaWllrUTp0rdgjhxvfYezvV5impssx8ydNxH6VGi44VEpwrTN68Aa961djDvWfqiqltWSZYhvKjn1KI7pmGH1nxseGs2ZdSvO2lLyy_2S8ajtcviw8t5CBYgMkc4Ovrr5n-A_CJZPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318856640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Frost, David M. ; Forrester, Cat</creator><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M. ; Forrester, Cat</creatorcontrib><description>Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals’ actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0146167213476896</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23407747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Logistic Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; Love ; Male ; Mental Health ; Motivation ; Object Attachment ; Personal relationships ; Personal Satisfaction ; Quality of life ; Self Concept ; Social psychology ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2013-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-469</ispartof><rights>2013 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,33753,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23407747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Cat</creatorcontrib><title>Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health</title><title>Personality & social psychology bulletin</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals’ actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Love</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1P3DAQxa0KVBbae0_IEhcOG7Djj0m4tUsLSKBKtFWPkeMdg5HjhDgrxH9fbxcQQuI0kt9v3vjpEfKFsyPOAY4Zl5prKLmQoKtafyAzrlRZgBRii8zWcrHWd8huSneMMall-ZHslEIyAAkz8rAIfcKIKdFTn-yIg4nWY6I-0uu-M3Hyll5jMJPvY7r1QzqhF90QvN28UNePL7oJ9C-GUHxDH2_m9NdkWh_89DinJi7pFcYpE-downT7iWw7ExJ-fpp75M-P778X58Xlz7OLxdfLwkglpwIdlMqAtYyzegmyrnXZggYBrauqCpRyNThjlsqWzHFmctjaWllrUTp0rdgjhxvfYezvV5impssx8ydNxH6VGi44VEpwrTN68Aa961djDvWfqiqltWSZYhvKjn1KI7pmGH1nxseGs2ZdSvO2lLyy_2S8ajtcviw8t5CBYgMkc4Ovrr5n-A_CJZPQ</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Frost, David M.</creator><creator>Forrester, Cat</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health</title><author>Frost, David M. ; Forrester, Cat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Love</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Cat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frost, David M.</au><au>Forrester, Cat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health</atitle><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>456</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>456-469</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals’ actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23407747</pmid><doi>10.1177/0146167213476896</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-1672 |
ispartof | Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2013-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-469 |
issn | 0146-1672 1552-7433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317853166 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Interpersonal Relations Logistic Models Longitudinal Studies Love Male Mental Health Motivation Object Attachment Personal relationships Personal Satisfaction Quality of life Self Concept Social psychology Trust |
title | Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A44%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closeness%20Discrepancies%20in%20Romantic%20Relationships:%20Implications%20for%20Relational%20Well-Being,%20Stability,%20and%20Mental%20Health&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Frost,%20David%20M.&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=456&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=456-469&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0146167213476896&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1317853166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318856640&rft_id=info:pmid/23407747&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0146167213476896&rfr_iscdi=true |