Loading…

Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health

Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality & social psychology bulletin 2013-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-469
Main Authors: Frost, David M., Forrester, Cat
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3
container_end_page 469
container_issue 4
container_start_page 456
container_title Personality & social psychology bulletin
container_volume 39
creator Frost, David M.
Forrester, Cat
description Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals’ actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0146167213476896
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317853166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0146167213476896</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1317853166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1P3DAQxa0KVBbae0_IEhcOG7Djj0m4tUsLSKBKtFWPkeMdg5HjhDgrxH9fbxcQQuI0kt9v3vjpEfKFsyPOAY4Zl5prKLmQoKtafyAzrlRZgBRii8zWcrHWd8huSneMMall-ZHslEIyAAkz8rAIfcKIKdFTn-yIg4nWY6I-0uu-M3Hyll5jMJPvY7r1QzqhF90QvN28UNePL7oJ9C-GUHxDH2_m9NdkWh_89DinJi7pFcYpE-downT7iWw7ExJ-fpp75M-P778X58Xlz7OLxdfLwkglpwIdlMqAtYyzegmyrnXZggYBrauqCpRyNThjlsqWzHFmctjaWllrUTp0rdgjhxvfYezvV5impssx8ydNxH6VGi44VEpwrTN68Aa961djDvWfqiqltWSZYhvKjn1KI7pmGH1nxseGs2ZdSvO2lLyy_2S8ajtcviw8t5CBYgMkc4Ovrr5n-A_CJZPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318856640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Frost, David M. ; Forrester, Cat</creator><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M. ; Forrester, Cat</creatorcontrib><description>Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals’ actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0146167213476896</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23407747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Logistic Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; Love ; Male ; Mental Health ; Motivation ; Object Attachment ; Personal relationships ; Personal Satisfaction ; Quality of life ; Self Concept ; Social psychology ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin, 2013-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-469</ispartof><rights>2013 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,33753,79110</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23407747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Cat</creatorcontrib><title>Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health</title><title>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</title><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><description>Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals’ actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Love</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1P3DAQxa0KVBbae0_IEhcOG7Djj0m4tUsLSKBKtFWPkeMdg5HjhDgrxH9fbxcQQuI0kt9v3vjpEfKFsyPOAY4Zl5prKLmQoKtafyAzrlRZgBRii8zWcrHWd8huSneMMall-ZHslEIyAAkz8rAIfcKIKdFTn-yIg4nWY6I-0uu-M3Hyll5jMJPvY7r1QzqhF90QvN28UNePL7oJ9C-GUHxDH2_m9NdkWh_89DinJi7pFcYpE-downT7iWw7ExJ-fpp75M-P778X58Xlz7OLxdfLwkglpwIdlMqAtYyzegmyrnXZggYBrauqCpRyNThjlsqWzHFmctjaWllrUTp0rdgjhxvfYezvV5impssx8ydNxH6VGi44VEpwrTN68Aa961djDvWfqiqltWSZYhvKjn1KI7pmGH1nxseGs2ZdSvO2lLyy_2S8ajtcviw8t5CBYgMkc4Ovrr5n-A_CJZPQ</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Frost, David M.</creator><creator>Forrester, Cat</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health</title><author>Frost, David M. ; Forrester, Cat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Love</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Cat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frost, David M.</au><au>Forrester, Cat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health</atitle><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Pers Soc Psychol Bull</addtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>456</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>456-469</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>Experiences of closeness in romantic relationships are associated with heightened levels of relational well-being and mental health. However, individuals differ in the degree of closeness they desire in their relationships. This study used the construct of inclusion of other in self (IOS) to analyze discrepancies between individuals’ actual and ideal levels of closeness in their relationships and the implications of these discrepancies for relational well-being and mental health. A longitudinal survey of partnered individuals demonstrated that optimal levels of relational well-being and mental health existed when individuals had minimal discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS, regardless of their actual levels of IOS. Individuals whose actual levels of IOS moved closer to their ideal levels over a 2-year period reported improved relational well-being and mental health. Individuals with little to no discrepancies between actual and ideal IOS were also less likely to break-up with their partners over time.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23407747</pmid><doi>10.1177/0146167213476896</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-1672
ispartof Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2013-04, Vol.39 (4), p.456-469
issn 0146-1672
1552-7433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1317853166
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Logistic Models
Longitudinal Studies
Love
Male
Mental Health
Motivation
Object Attachment
Personal relationships
Personal Satisfaction
Quality of life
Self Concept
Social psychology
Trust
title Closeness Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships: Implications for Relational Well-Being, Stability, and Mental Health
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A44%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closeness%20Discrepancies%20in%20Romantic%20Relationships:%20Implications%20for%20Relational%20Well-Being,%20Stability,%20and%20Mental%20Health&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Frost,%20David%20M.&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=456&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=456-469&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0146167213476896&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1317853166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a454t-ef725a7cc0109d749962b76737bf888755f97faad5c20f10a6729cc49632fefb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318856640&rft_id=info:pmid/23407747&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0146167213476896&rfr_iscdi=true