Functionalized arene-ruthenium(II) complexes: dangling vs. tethering side chain

The reactivity of compounds [RuCl2(η(6)-C6H5OCH2CH2OH)(L)] (L = phosphine or phosphite) towards the chloride abstractor AgSbF6 has been investigated. Thus, the treatment of the triphenylphosphite complex [RuCl2(η(6)-C6H5OCH2CH2OH){P(OPh)3}] with one equivalent of AgSbF6 gave rise to the formation of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dalton transactions : an international journal of inorganic chemistry 2013-04, Vol.42 (15), p.5412-5420
Main Authors: Lastra-Barreira, Beatriz, Díez, Josefina, Crochet, Pascale, Fernández, Israel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coordination Complexes - chemical synthesis
Coordination Complexes - chemistry
Crystallography, X-Ray
Molecular Conformation
Phosphines - chemistry
Ruthenium - chemistry
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The reactivity of compounds [RuCl2(η(6)-C6H5OCH2CH2OH)(L)] (L = phosphine or phosphite) towards the chloride abstractor AgSbF6 has been investigated. Thus, the treatment of the triphenylphosphite complex [RuCl2(η(6)-C6H5OCH2CH2OH){P(OPh)3}] with one equivalent of AgSbF6 gave rise to the formation of the dinuclear dichloro-bridged species [{Ru(μ-Cl)(η(6)-C6H5OCH2CH2OH){P(OPh)3}}2](2+) as the hexafluoroantimonate salt. On the other hand, the triphenylphosphine analog [RuCl2(η(6)-C6H5OCH2CH2OH)(PPh3)] led, under the same experimental conditions, to the di-ruthenium derivative [{RuCl(η(6)-C6H5OCH2CH2OH)(PPh3)}2(μ-Cl)][SbF6] containing only one Cl-bridge. In sharp contrast, treatment of precursors [RuCl2(η(6)-C6H5CH2CH2CH2OH)(L)] (L = P(OPh)3, PPh3, P(OEt)3) with AgSbF6 resulted in the clean formation of the tethered compounds [RuCl{η(6):κ(1)(O)-C6H5CH2CH2CH2OH}(L)][SbF6]. The differences in reactivity observed have been rationalized by theoretical calculations.
ISSN:1477-9226
1477-9234
DOI:10.1039/c3dt33051f