Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy

• Published in: Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2012-10, Vol.76 (4), p.804-811
• Main Authors: Tae, Jae Woong, MD, Lee, Jong Chan, MD, Hong, Su Jin, MD, Han, Jae Pil, MD, Lee, Yun Hee, MD, Chung, Jong Ho, MD, Yoon, Hyung Geun, MD, Ko, Bong Min, MD, Cho, Joo Young, MD, Lee, Joon Seong, MD, Lee, Moon Sung, MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Audiovisual Aids; Biological and medical sciences; Cartoons as Topic; Cathartics - administration & dosage; Colonoscopy; Digestive system. Abdomen; Endoscopy; Female; Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen; Human viral diseases; Humans; Infectious diseases; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Logistic Models; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Patient Compliance; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Polyethylene Glycols - administration & dosage; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Viral diseases; Viral diseases of the lymphoid tissue and the blood. Aids
• ISSN: 0016-5107; 1097-6779
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.026

Background High-quality bowel preparation is a prerequisite for colonoscopy. Few studies have evaluated visual aids as a means of improving the quality of bowel preparation. Objective To assess the effect of patient education by using cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation. Design An endoscopist-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects Patients scheduled for screening colonoscopy in a health examination center. Interventions Patients were assigned to receive the existing verbal and written instructions (group A) or a new cartoon visual educational instruction (group B) for colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements The primary endpoint was the quality of bowel preparation, assessed by using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary endpoints were the quality of bowel preparation assessed by using the Universal Preparation Assessment Scale; insertion, withdrawal, and workup times; and polyp detection rates in the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with poor bowel preparation according to a BBPS score less than 5. Results Group B exhibited better bowel preparation than group A according to BBPS scores (mean BBPS score, 6.12 ± 2.19 vs 7.44 ± 1.87, P ≤ .01; median BBPS score, 6.00 ± 0.00 vs 9.00 ± 0.00, P ≤ .01; good bowel preparation for colonoscopy, BBPS score ≥5, 81.6% vs 93.1%, P = .02). Multivariate analysis revealed that older age (odds ratio 1.07, P ≤ .01) and no use of visual aids (odds ratio 3.08, P = .02) were independent factors associated with poor bowel preparation. Limitations Single-center study. Conclusions Patient education with cartoons effectively improved bowel preparation for colonoscopy.