Loading…
Is it Financially Efficient to Lose the Ring-Fenced Elective Orthopaedic Ward?
Background In an effort to rationalize National Health Service (NHS) funds in the United Kingdom, some hospitals have used the orthopaedic elective ring-fenced ward to admit general acute emergencies, admitting elective arthroplasty patients to general wards. Objective The aim of this study was to a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied health economics and health policy 2013-04, Vol.11 (2), p.151-154 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
In an effort to rationalize National Health Service (NHS) funds in the United Kingdom, some hospitals have used the orthopaedic elective ring-fenced ward to admit general acute emergencies, admitting elective arthroplasty patients to general wards.
Objective
The aim of this study was to analyse the financial effect and length of stay of elective arthroplasty patients admitted to general wards rather than ‘ring-fenced’ orthopaedic wards.
Study Design
Retrospective observational study
Setting
Hospital care
Patients
During the period between 01 November 2010 and 31 March 2011, 194 consecutive patients were admitted for elective total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Due to increased bed pressures, 35 (18.04 %) of the patients were admitted to general wards instead of our standard elective ring-fenced orthopaedic ward. Data was collected and analysed for type of surgery, age, sex, length of stay, and ward.
Results
The average length of stay in the general wards was 1.89 days longer (range 3–22 days;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1175-5652 1179-1896 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40258-013-0018-0 |