Loading…

Vertebral Body Stenting Versus Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND:In the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, vertebral body stenting with an expandable scaffold inserted before application of the bone cement was developed to impede secondary loss of vertebral height encountered in patients treated with balloon kyphoplasty. The purpose of this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2013-04, Vol.95 (7), p.577-584
Main Authors: Werner, Clément M.L, Osterhoff, Georg, Schlickeiser, Jannis, Jenni, Raphael, Wanner, Guido A, Ossendorf, Christian, Simmen, Hans-Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3361-84f0c9c0c76cd5b1c185d96e425b1a722c0e805f383684030f412fc168af8d8b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3361-84f0c9c0c76cd5b1c185d96e425b1a722c0e805f383684030f412fc168af8d8b3
container_end_page 584
container_issue 7
container_start_page 577
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 95
creator Werner, Clément M.L
Osterhoff, Georg
Schlickeiser, Jannis
Jenni, Raphael
Wanner, Guido A
Ossendorf, Christian
Simmen, Hans-Peter
description BACKGROUND:In the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, vertebral body stenting with an expandable scaffold inserted before application of the bone cement was developed to impede secondary loss of vertebral height encountered in patients treated with balloon kyphoplasty. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether there are relevant differences between balloon kyphoplasty and vertebral body stenting with regard to perioperative and postoperative findings. METHODS:In a two-armed randomized controlled trial, patients with a total of 100 fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were treated with either balloon kyphoplasty or vertebral body stenting. The primary outcome was the post-interventional change in the kyphotic angle on radiographs. The secondary outcomes were the maximum pressure of the balloon tamp during inflation, radiation exposure time, perioperative complications, and cement leakage. RESULTS:The mean reduction (and standard deviation) of kyphosis (the kyphotic correction angle) was 4.5° ± 3.6° after balloon kyphoplasty and 4.7° ± 4.2° after vertebral body stenting (p = 0.972). The mean pressures were 24 ± 5 bar (348 ± 72 pounds per square inch [psi]) during vertebral body stenting and 16 ± 6 bar (233 ± 81 psi) during balloon kyphoplasty (p = 0.014). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure time.None of the patients underwent revision surgery, and postoperative neurologic sequelae were not observed. Cement leakage occurred at twenty-five of the 100 vertebral levels without significant differences between the two intervention arms (p = 0.230). Intraoperative material-related complications were observed at one of the fifty vertebral levels in the balloon kyphoplasty group and at nine of the fifty levels in the vertebral body stenting group. CONCLUSIONS:No beneficial effect of vertebral body stenting over balloon kyphoplasty was found among patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with regard to kyphotic correction, cement leakage, radiation exposure time, or neurologic sequelae. Vertebral body stenting was associated with significantly higher pressures during balloon inflation and more material-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.L.00024
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1324385201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1324385201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3361-84f0c9c0c76cd5b1c185d96e425b1a722c0e805f383684030f412fc168af8d8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1PGzEQhq2KqqTArWfkI4du8NduHG4kKhQaCYmvq-V4x81S73pre4XSU3863obCaTSvHr0zehD6QsmUUVKdXi-u76arKSGEiQ9oQkteFpTLag9NckSLOS_LffQ5xqeMCEFmn9A-yxlnczpBfx8hJFgH7fDC11t8l6BLTfcT5zwOEf_Y9hvfOx3TFlsfcNoAvg-gU5s57C2-iQl874NPjcHvZUvf9gFibHyHL4I2acjbGT7Ht7qrfdv8gTr3NNodoo9WuwhHr_MAPVx8u19-L1Y3l1fL81VhOK9oIYUlZm6ImVWmLtfUUFnW8woEy4ueMWYISFJaLnklBeHECsqsoZXUVtZyzQ_Qya63D_73ADGptokGnNMd-CEqypngsmSEZvTrDjXBxxjAqj40rQ5bRYkanavRuVqpf84zfvzaPKxbqN_g_5IzIHbAs3cpa_3lhmcIagPapc1YQkTFeDGeJuPrxRhR_gJz3Y1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324385201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertebral Body Stenting Versus Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Trial</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Werner, Clément M.L ; Osterhoff, Georg ; Schlickeiser, Jannis ; Jenni, Raphael ; Wanner, Guido A ; Ossendorf, Christian ; Simmen, Hans-Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Werner, Clément M.L ; Osterhoff, Georg ; Schlickeiser, Jannis ; Jenni, Raphael ; Wanner, Guido A ; Ossendorf, Christian ; Simmen, Hans-Peter</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:In the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, vertebral body stenting with an expandable scaffold inserted before application of the bone cement was developed to impede secondary loss of vertebral height encountered in patients treated with balloon kyphoplasty. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether there are relevant differences between balloon kyphoplasty and vertebral body stenting with regard to perioperative and postoperative findings. METHODS:In a two-armed randomized controlled trial, patients with a total of 100 fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were treated with either balloon kyphoplasty or vertebral body stenting. The primary outcome was the post-interventional change in the kyphotic angle on radiographs. The secondary outcomes were the maximum pressure of the balloon tamp during inflation, radiation exposure time, perioperative complications, and cement leakage. RESULTS:The mean reduction (and standard deviation) of kyphosis (the kyphotic correction angle) was 4.5° ± 3.6° after balloon kyphoplasty and 4.7° ± 4.2° after vertebral body stenting (p = 0.972). The mean pressures were 24 ± 5 bar (348 ± 72 pounds per square inch [psi]) during vertebral body stenting and 16 ± 6 bar (233 ± 81 psi) during balloon kyphoplasty (p = 0.014). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure time.None of the patients underwent revision surgery, and postoperative neurologic sequelae were not observed. Cement leakage occurred at twenty-five of the 100 vertebral levels without significant differences between the two intervention arms (p = 0.230). Intraoperative material-related complications were observed at one of the fifty vertebral levels in the balloon kyphoplasty group and at nine of the fifty levels in the vertebral body stenting group. CONCLUSIONS:No beneficial effect of vertebral body stenting over balloon kyphoplasty was found among patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with regard to kyphotic correction, cement leakage, radiation exposure time, or neurologic sequelae. Vertebral body stenting was associated with significantly higher pressures during balloon inflation and more material-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23553291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bone Cements ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials ; Female ; Fractures, Compression - diagnosis ; Fractures, Compression - surgery ; Humans ; Kyphoplasty - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis - diagnosis ; Osteoporosis - surgery ; Polymethyl Methacrylate ; Prospective Studies ; Spinal Fractures - diagnosis ; Spinal Fractures - surgery ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Stents ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2013-04, Vol.95 (7), p.577-584</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2013 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3361-84f0c9c0c76cd5b1c185d96e425b1a722c0e805f383684030f412fc168af8d8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3361-84f0c9c0c76cd5b1c185d96e425b1a722c0e805f383684030f412fc168af8d8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23553291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Werner, Clément M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osterhoff, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlickeiser, Jannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenni, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanner, Guido A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ossendorf, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmen, Hans-Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Vertebral Body Stenting Versus Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Trial</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:In the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, vertebral body stenting with an expandable scaffold inserted before application of the bone cement was developed to impede secondary loss of vertebral height encountered in patients treated with balloon kyphoplasty. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether there are relevant differences between balloon kyphoplasty and vertebral body stenting with regard to perioperative and postoperative findings. METHODS:In a two-armed randomized controlled trial, patients with a total of 100 fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were treated with either balloon kyphoplasty or vertebral body stenting. The primary outcome was the post-interventional change in the kyphotic angle on radiographs. The secondary outcomes were the maximum pressure of the balloon tamp during inflation, radiation exposure time, perioperative complications, and cement leakage. RESULTS:The mean reduction (and standard deviation) of kyphosis (the kyphotic correction angle) was 4.5° ± 3.6° after balloon kyphoplasty and 4.7° ± 4.2° after vertebral body stenting (p = 0.972). The mean pressures were 24 ± 5 bar (348 ± 72 pounds per square inch [psi]) during vertebral body stenting and 16 ± 6 bar (233 ± 81 psi) during balloon kyphoplasty (p = 0.014). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure time.None of the patients underwent revision surgery, and postoperative neurologic sequelae were not observed. Cement leakage occurred at twenty-five of the 100 vertebral levels without significant differences between the two intervention arms (p = 0.230). Intraoperative material-related complications were observed at one of the fifty vertebral levels in the balloon kyphoplasty group and at nine of the fifty levels in the vertebral body stenting group. CONCLUSIONS:No beneficial effect of vertebral body stenting over balloon kyphoplasty was found among patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with regard to kyphotic correction, cement leakage, radiation exposure time, or neurologic sequelae. Vertebral body stenting was associated with significantly higher pressures during balloon inflation and more material-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Compression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fractures, Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kyphoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - surgery</subject><subject>Polymethyl Methacrylate</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1PGzEQhq2KqqTArWfkI4du8NduHG4kKhQaCYmvq-V4x81S73pre4XSU3863obCaTSvHr0zehD6QsmUUVKdXi-u76arKSGEiQ9oQkteFpTLag9NckSLOS_LffQ5xqeMCEFmn9A-yxlnczpBfx8hJFgH7fDC11t8l6BLTfcT5zwOEf_Y9hvfOx3TFlsfcNoAvg-gU5s57C2-iQl874NPjcHvZUvf9gFibHyHL4I2acjbGT7Ht7qrfdv8gTr3NNodoo9WuwhHr_MAPVx8u19-L1Y3l1fL81VhOK9oIYUlZm6ImVWmLtfUUFnW8woEy4ueMWYISFJaLnklBeHECsqsoZXUVtZyzQ_Qya63D_73ADGptokGnNMd-CEqypngsmSEZvTrDjXBxxjAqj40rQ5bRYkanavRuVqpf84zfvzaPKxbqN_g_5IzIHbAs3cpa_3lhmcIagPapc1YQkTFeDGeJuPrxRhR_gJz3Y1g</recordid><startdate>20130403</startdate><enddate>20130403</enddate><creator>Werner, Clément M.L</creator><creator>Osterhoff, Georg</creator><creator>Schlickeiser, Jannis</creator><creator>Jenni, Raphael</creator><creator>Wanner, Guido A</creator><creator>Ossendorf, Christian</creator><creator>Simmen, Hans-Peter</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130403</creationdate><title>Vertebral Body Stenting Versus Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Trial</title><author>Werner, Clément M.L ; Osterhoff, Georg ; Schlickeiser, Jannis ; Jenni, Raphael ; Wanner, Guido A ; Ossendorf, Christian ; Simmen, Hans-Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3361-84f0c9c0c76cd5b1c185d96e425b1a722c0e805f383684030f412fc168af8d8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Compression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fractures, Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kyphoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - surgery</topic><topic>Polymethyl Methacrylate</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Werner, Clément M.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osterhoff, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlickeiser, Jannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenni, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanner, Guido A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ossendorf, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmen, Hans-Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Werner, Clément M.L</au><au>Osterhoff, Georg</au><au>Schlickeiser, Jannis</au><au>Jenni, Raphael</au><au>Wanner, Guido A</au><au>Ossendorf, Christian</au><au>Simmen, Hans-Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertebral Body Stenting Versus Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2013-04-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>577</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>577-584</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:In the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, vertebral body stenting with an expandable scaffold inserted before application of the bone cement was developed to impede secondary loss of vertebral height encountered in patients treated with balloon kyphoplasty. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether there are relevant differences between balloon kyphoplasty and vertebral body stenting with regard to perioperative and postoperative findings. METHODS:In a two-armed randomized controlled trial, patients with a total of 100 fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were treated with either balloon kyphoplasty or vertebral body stenting. The primary outcome was the post-interventional change in the kyphotic angle on radiographs. The secondary outcomes were the maximum pressure of the balloon tamp during inflation, radiation exposure time, perioperative complications, and cement leakage. RESULTS:The mean reduction (and standard deviation) of kyphosis (the kyphotic correction angle) was 4.5° ± 3.6° after balloon kyphoplasty and 4.7° ± 4.2° after vertebral body stenting (p = 0.972). The mean pressures were 24 ± 5 bar (348 ± 72 pounds per square inch [psi]) during vertebral body stenting and 16 ± 6 bar (233 ± 81 psi) during balloon kyphoplasty (p = 0.014). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure time.None of the patients underwent revision surgery, and postoperative neurologic sequelae were not observed. Cement leakage occurred at twenty-five of the 100 vertebral levels without significant differences between the two intervention arms (p = 0.230). Intraoperative material-related complications were observed at one of the fifty vertebral levels in the balloon kyphoplasty group and at nine of the fifty levels in the vertebral body stenting group. CONCLUSIONS:No beneficial effect of vertebral body stenting over balloon kyphoplasty was found among patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with regard to kyphotic correction, cement leakage, radiation exposure time, or neurologic sequelae. Vertebral body stenting was associated with significantly higher pressures during balloon inflation and more material-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>23553291</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.L.00024</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2013-04, Vol.95 (7), p.577-584
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1324385201
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Aged
Bone Cements
Chi-Square Distribution
Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials
Female
Fractures, Compression - diagnosis
Fractures, Compression - surgery
Humans
Kyphoplasty - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis - diagnosis
Osteoporosis - surgery
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Prospective Studies
Spinal Fractures - diagnosis
Spinal Fractures - surgery
Statistics, Nonparametric
Stents
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
title Vertebral Body Stenting Versus Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertebral%20Body%20Stenting%20Versus%20Kyphoplasty%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Osteoporotic%20Vertebral%20Compression%20Fractures:%20A%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Werner,%20Cl%C3%A9ment%20M.L&rft.date=2013-04-03&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=577&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=577-584&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.L.00024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1324385201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3361-84f0c9c0c76cd5b1c185d96e425b1a722c0e805f383684030f412fc168af8d8b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324385201&rft_id=info:pmid/23553291&rfr_iscdi=true