Loading…

Sleeve Gastrectomy Severe Complications: Is It Always a Reasonable Surgical Option?

Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is widely adopted but exposes serious complications. Methods A retrospective database analysis was done to study LSG staple line complications in a tertiary referral university center with surgical ICU experienced in treatment of morbid obesity and co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity surgery 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.676-686
Main Authors: Moszkowicz, David, Arienzo, Roberto, Khettab, Idir, Rahmi, Gabriel, Zinzindohoué, Franck, Berger, Anne, Chevallier, Jean-Marc
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8161d9c0b800255ec3d3718883748d2c24e9108feac918a62663e355129f13ef3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8161d9c0b800255ec3d3718883748d2c24e9108feac918a62663e355129f13ef3
container_end_page 686
container_issue 5
container_start_page 676
container_title Obesity surgery
container_volume 23
creator Moszkowicz, David
Arienzo, Roberto
Khettab, Idir
Rahmi, Gabriel
Zinzindohoué, Franck
Berger, Anne
Chevallier, Jean-Marc
description Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is widely adopted but exposes serious complications. Methods A retrospective database analysis was done to study LSG staple line complications in a tertiary referral university center with surgical ICU experienced in treatment of morbid obesity and complications. Twenty-two consecutive patients were referred between January 2004 and February 2012 with postoperative gastric leak or stenosis after LSG. Interventions consisted in the control of intra-abdominal and general sepsis; restoration of staple line continuity or revision of LSG; nutritional support; treatment of associated complications. Main outcome measures concerned success rates of therapeutic strategies, morbidity and mortality rates, LOS, and time to cure. Results Thirteen patients (59 %) were referred after failure of reoperation (seven fistula repairs were attempted). Three patients received emergency surgery in our center with transorificial intubation and jejunostomy formation. An endoscopic stent was tried in nine patients but failed in 84.6 % of cases within 20 days (1–161). Seven patients (32 %) necessitated total gastrectomy within 217 days (0–1,915 days) for conservative treatment failure. Procedures under general anesthesia were required in 41 % of cases, organ failure was found in 55 % of cases, and central venous device infection in 40 %. Mortality rate was 4.5 % ( n  = 1). Patients with unfavorable evolution of LSG complications (death or additional gastrectomy) had more previous bariatric procedure (82 % vs. 18 %, p  = 0.003). Median time to cure was 310 days (9–546 days). Conclusions LSG exposes severe complications occurring in patients with benign condition. Endoscopic stents entail high failure rate. Total gastrectomy is required in one third of the cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11695-012-0860-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1326725475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1326725475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8161d9c0b800255ec3d3718883748d2c24e9108feac918a62663e355129f13ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWj9-gBcJePGyOpPsZrNeRIofBUGweg5pOlsq-1GTXaX_3tRWEcHTwMwz7wwPY8cI5wiQXwREVWQJoEhAK0jSLTbAHHQCqdDbbABFbOpCyD22H8IrgEAlxC7bEzIFUAADNh5XRO_E72zoPLmurZd8HBue-LCtF9Xc2W7eNuGSjwIfdfy6-rDLwC1_Ihvaxk4q4uPezyJX8cfFir06ZDulrQIdbeoBe7m9eR7eJw-Pd6Ph9UPiZC66RKPCaeFgouNjWUZOTmWOWmuZp3oqnEipQNAlWVegtkooJUlmGYqiREmlPGBn69yFb996Cp2p58FRVdmG2j4YlELlIkvzLKKnf9DXtvdN_O6LkiLLlY4Urinn2xA8lWbh57X1S4NgVsbN2riJxs3KuEnjzskmuZ_UNP3Z-FYcAbEGQhw1M_K_Tv-b-glYb4jF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326325768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sleeve Gastrectomy Severe Complications: Is It Always a Reasonable Surgical Option?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Moszkowicz, David ; Arienzo, Roberto ; Khettab, Idir ; Rahmi, Gabriel ; Zinzindohoué, Franck ; Berger, Anne ; Chevallier, Jean-Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Moszkowicz, David ; Arienzo, Roberto ; Khettab, Idir ; Rahmi, Gabriel ; Zinzindohoué, Franck ; Berger, Anne ; Chevallier, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><description>Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is widely adopted but exposes serious complications. Methods A retrospective database analysis was done to study LSG staple line complications in a tertiary referral university center with surgical ICU experienced in treatment of morbid obesity and complications. Twenty-two consecutive patients were referred between January 2004 and February 2012 with postoperative gastric leak or stenosis after LSG. Interventions consisted in the control of intra-abdominal and general sepsis; restoration of staple line continuity or revision of LSG; nutritional support; treatment of associated complications. Main outcome measures concerned success rates of therapeutic strategies, morbidity and mortality rates, LOS, and time to cure. Results Thirteen patients (59 %) were referred after failure of reoperation (seven fistula repairs were attempted). Three patients received emergency surgery in our center with transorificial intubation and jejunostomy formation. An endoscopic stent was tried in nine patients but failed in 84.6 % of cases within 20 days (1–161). Seven patients (32 %) necessitated total gastrectomy within 217 days (0–1,915 days) for conservative treatment failure. Procedures under general anesthesia were required in 41 % of cases, organ failure was found in 55 % of cases, and central venous device infection in 40 %. Mortality rate was 4.5 % ( n  = 1). Patients with unfavorable evolution of LSG complications (death or additional gastrectomy) had more previous bariatric procedure (82 % vs. 18 %, p  = 0.003). Median time to cure was 310 days (9–546 days). Conclusions LSG exposes severe complications occurring in patients with benign condition. Endoscopic stents entail high failure rate. Total gastrectomy is required in one third of the cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-012-0860-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23400600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology ; Anastomotic Leak - etiology ; Anastomotic Leak - surgery ; Body Mass Index ; Constriction, Pathologic - epidemiology ; Constriction, Pathologic - etiology ; Constriction, Pathologic - surgery ; Female ; France - epidemiology ; Gastric Fistula - epidemiology ; Gastric Fistula - etiology ; Gastric Fistula - surgery ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Gastroplasty - adverse effects ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Leakage ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - complications ; Obesity, Morbid - epidemiology ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Original Contributions ; Patient Selection ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Revisions ; Risk Assessment ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Time Factors ; Treatment Failure ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.676-686</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8161d9c0b800255ec3d3718883748d2c24e9108feac918a62663e355129f13ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8161d9c0b800255ec3d3718883748d2c24e9108feac918a62663e355129f13ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23400600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moszkowicz, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arienzo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khettab, Idir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmi, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinzindohoué, Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevallier, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Sleeve Gastrectomy Severe Complications: Is It Always a Reasonable Surgical Option?</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is widely adopted but exposes serious complications. Methods A retrospective database analysis was done to study LSG staple line complications in a tertiary referral university center with surgical ICU experienced in treatment of morbid obesity and complications. Twenty-two consecutive patients were referred between January 2004 and February 2012 with postoperative gastric leak or stenosis after LSG. Interventions consisted in the control of intra-abdominal and general sepsis; restoration of staple line continuity or revision of LSG; nutritional support; treatment of associated complications. Main outcome measures concerned success rates of therapeutic strategies, morbidity and mortality rates, LOS, and time to cure. Results Thirteen patients (59 %) were referred after failure of reoperation (seven fistula repairs were attempted). Three patients received emergency surgery in our center with transorificial intubation and jejunostomy formation. An endoscopic stent was tried in nine patients but failed in 84.6 % of cases within 20 days (1–161). Seven patients (32 %) necessitated total gastrectomy within 217 days (0–1,915 days) for conservative treatment failure. Procedures under general anesthesia were required in 41 % of cases, organ failure was found in 55 % of cases, and central venous device infection in 40 %. Mortality rate was 4.5 % ( n  = 1). Patients with unfavorable evolution of LSG complications (death or additional gastrectomy) had more previous bariatric procedure (82 % vs. 18 %, p  = 0.003). Median time to cure was 310 days (9–546 days). Conclusions LSG exposes severe complications occurring in patients with benign condition. Endoscopic stents entail high failure rate. Total gastrectomy is required in one third of the cases.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - surgery</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gastric Fistula - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gastric Fistula - etiology</subject><subject>Gastric Fistula - surgery</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Gastroplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - complications</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWj9-gBcJePGyOpPsZrNeRIofBUGweg5pOlsq-1GTXaX_3tRWEcHTwMwz7wwPY8cI5wiQXwREVWQJoEhAK0jSLTbAHHQCqdDbbABFbOpCyD22H8IrgEAlxC7bEzIFUAADNh5XRO_E72zoPLmurZd8HBue-LCtF9Xc2W7eNuGSjwIfdfy6-rDLwC1_Ihvaxk4q4uPezyJX8cfFir06ZDulrQIdbeoBe7m9eR7eJw-Pd6Ph9UPiZC66RKPCaeFgouNjWUZOTmWOWmuZp3oqnEipQNAlWVegtkooJUlmGYqiREmlPGBn69yFb996Cp2p58FRVdmG2j4YlELlIkvzLKKnf9DXtvdN_O6LkiLLlY4Urinn2xA8lWbh57X1S4NgVsbN2riJxs3KuEnjzskmuZ_UNP3Z-FYcAbEGQhw1M_K_Tv-b-glYb4jF</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Moszkowicz, David</creator><creator>Arienzo, Roberto</creator><creator>Khettab, Idir</creator><creator>Rahmi, Gabriel</creator><creator>Zinzindohoué, Franck</creator><creator>Berger, Anne</creator><creator>Chevallier, Jean-Marc</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Sleeve Gastrectomy Severe Complications: Is It Always a Reasonable Surgical Option?</title><author>Moszkowicz, David ; Arienzo, Roberto ; Khettab, Idir ; Rahmi, Gabriel ; Zinzindohoué, Franck ; Berger, Anne ; Chevallier, Jean-Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8161d9c0b800255ec3d3718883748d2c24e9108feac918a62663e355129f13ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - surgery</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - etiology</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gastric Fistula - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gastric Fistula - etiology</topic><topic>Gastric Fistula - surgery</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Gastroplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - complications</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moszkowicz, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arienzo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khettab, Idir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmi, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinzindohoué, Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevallier, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moszkowicz, David</au><au>Arienzo, Roberto</au><au>Khettab, Idir</au><au>Rahmi, Gabriel</au><au>Zinzindohoué, Franck</au><au>Berger, Anne</au><au>Chevallier, Jean-Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sleeve Gastrectomy Severe Complications: Is It Always a Reasonable Surgical Option?</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>676</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>676-686</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is widely adopted but exposes serious complications. Methods A retrospective database analysis was done to study LSG staple line complications in a tertiary referral university center with surgical ICU experienced in treatment of morbid obesity and complications. Twenty-two consecutive patients were referred between January 2004 and February 2012 with postoperative gastric leak or stenosis after LSG. Interventions consisted in the control of intra-abdominal and general sepsis; restoration of staple line continuity or revision of LSG; nutritional support; treatment of associated complications. Main outcome measures concerned success rates of therapeutic strategies, morbidity and mortality rates, LOS, and time to cure. Results Thirteen patients (59 %) were referred after failure of reoperation (seven fistula repairs were attempted). Three patients received emergency surgery in our center with transorificial intubation and jejunostomy formation. An endoscopic stent was tried in nine patients but failed in 84.6 % of cases within 20 days (1–161). Seven patients (32 %) necessitated total gastrectomy within 217 days (0–1,915 days) for conservative treatment failure. Procedures under general anesthesia were required in 41 % of cases, organ failure was found in 55 % of cases, and central venous device infection in 40 %. Mortality rate was 4.5 % ( n  = 1). Patients with unfavorable evolution of LSG complications (death or additional gastrectomy) had more previous bariatric procedure (82 % vs. 18 %, p  = 0.003). Median time to cure was 310 days (9–546 days). Conclusions LSG exposes severe complications occurring in patients with benign condition. Endoscopic stents entail high failure rate. Total gastrectomy is required in one third of the cases.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23400600</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11695-012-0860-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8923
ispartof Obesity surgery, 2013-05, Vol.23 (5), p.676-686
issn 0960-8923
1708-0428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1326725475
source Springer Nature
subjects Adult
Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology
Anastomotic Leak - etiology
Anastomotic Leak - surgery
Body Mass Index
Constriction, Pathologic - epidemiology
Constriction, Pathologic - etiology
Constriction, Pathologic - surgery
Female
France - epidemiology
Gastric Fistula - epidemiology
Gastric Fistula - etiology
Gastric Fistula - surgery
Gastrointestinal surgery
Gastroplasty - adverse effects
Humans
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Leakage
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Obesity
Obesity, Morbid - complications
Obesity, Morbid - epidemiology
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Original Contributions
Patient Selection
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Revisions
Risk Assessment
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Time Factors
Treatment Failure
Weight Loss
title Sleeve Gastrectomy Severe Complications: Is It Always a Reasonable Surgical Option?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A41%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sleeve%20Gastrectomy%20Severe%20Complications:%20Is%20It%20Always%20a%20Reasonable%20Surgical%20Option?&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Moszkowicz,%20David&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=676&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=676-686&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-012-0860-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1326725475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8161d9c0b800255ec3d3718883748d2c24e9108feac918a62663e355129f13ef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326325768&rft_id=info:pmid/23400600&rfr_iscdi=true