Loading…
Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations
1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Functional ecology 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.351-361 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33 |
container_end_page | 361 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 351 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Brown, Gregory P. Ujvari, Beata Madsen, Thomas Shine, Richard |
description | 1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairii) and slatey-grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) experience little direct cost or benefit from the arrival of toxic invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), because they rarely eat toads and if they do, are relatively resistant to the toads' toxins. Nonetheless, these snakes could be affected indirectly by toad-induced decreases in the availability of prey (native frogs) and/or by fatal poisoning of the snakes' predators (large varanid lizards). The former (bottom-up) effect predicts decreases in snake body condition, feeding and growth rates after toads arrive, whereas the latter (top-down) effect predicts increases in survival. 3. Our mark—recapture studies on these snakes in tropical Australia (for 7 years before and 7 years after toad arrival) reveal bottom-up effects both on an anurophagous dietary specialist (keelbacks) and a generalist feeder (slatey-grey snakes). 4. Top-down effects of toad arrival were seen in keelbacks but not in slatey-grey snakes, perhaps reflecting the latter's larger body size. 5. Indirect effects coinciding with the timing of toad invasion thus were mediated through changes in food supply for both native species and in rates of predation for one species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2435.12044 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328519624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23480832</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23480832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LHDEYhkOx0HXbc0-FgBS8jOb3JkdZtBUEL3oOmUyCWWeTaZKp-N-bca2FXvpd8hGe9-XjAeArRme4zTmmgneEUX6GCWLsA1i9_xyBFSJCdZIJ-gkcl7JDCClOyAr01_G3GVyGYT8ZW6EdTQ4-uALrg4M5jW1LHtY0dUN6itDEAfap1rTv5gk6752tjYiw5jQFa0ZYonl0cErTPJoaUiyfwUdvxuK-vL1rcH91ebf92d3c_rjeXtx0ljHMukH1glhJN4j3g3IC06HnGMlBKWGV4JgPzEkikDR974h1nkqJMCVeLCyla3B66J1y-jW7UvU-FOvG0USX5qIbKjlWohlZg5N_0F2ac2zXNYojzqlkC3V-oGxOpWTn9ZTD3uRnjZFenOvFsF4M61fnLfH9rdeU5sJnE20o7zGywYxvuGocP3BPYXTP_6vVV5fbP_3fDrldqSn_7aVMIkkJfQE3tJiS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1350553844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Brown, Gregory P. ; Ujvari, Beata ; Madsen, Thomas ; Shine, Richard</creator><contributor>Harwood, James</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P. ; Ujvari, Beata ; Madsen, Thomas ; Shine, Richard ; Harwood, James</creatorcontrib><description>1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairii) and slatey-grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) experience little direct cost or benefit from the arrival of toxic invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), because they rarely eat toads and if they do, are relatively resistant to the toads' toxins. Nonetheless, these snakes could be affected indirectly by toad-induced decreases in the availability of prey (native frogs) and/or by fatal poisoning of the snakes' predators (large varanid lizards). The former (bottom-up) effect predicts decreases in snake body condition, feeding and growth rates after toads arrive, whereas the latter (top-down) effect predicts increases in survival. 3. Our mark—recapture studies on these snakes in tropical Australia (for 7 years before and 7 years after toad arrival) reveal bottom-up effects both on an anurophagous dietary specialist (keelbacks) and a generalist feeder (slatey-grey snakes). 4. Top-down effects of toad arrival were seen in keelbacks but not in slatey-grey snakes, perhaps reflecting the latter's larger body size. 5. Indirect effects coinciding with the timing of toad invasion thus were mediated through changes in food supply for both native species and in rates of predation for one species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECOE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>alien species ; Amphibia ; Amphibia. Reptilia ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anura ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; biological invasion ; Canes ; Conservation biology ; Ecological invasion ; Ecology ; Evolutionary ecology ; Frogs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Human ecology ; Lacertilia ; Population ecology ; Predators ; prey availability ; reptile ; Snakes ; Toads ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.351-361</ispartof><rights>2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23480832$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23480832$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27145759$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Harwood, James</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ujvari, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairii) and slatey-grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) experience little direct cost or benefit from the arrival of toxic invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), because they rarely eat toads and if they do, are relatively resistant to the toads' toxins. Nonetheless, these snakes could be affected indirectly by toad-induced decreases in the availability of prey (native frogs) and/or by fatal poisoning of the snakes' predators (large varanid lizards). The former (bottom-up) effect predicts decreases in snake body condition, feeding and growth rates after toads arrive, whereas the latter (top-down) effect predicts increases in survival. 3. Our mark—recapture studies on these snakes in tropical Australia (for 7 years before and 7 years after toad arrival) reveal bottom-up effects both on an anurophagous dietary specialist (keelbacks) and a generalist feeder (slatey-grey snakes). 4. Top-down effects of toad arrival were seen in keelbacks but not in slatey-grey snakes, perhaps reflecting the latter's larger body size. 5. Indirect effects coinciding with the timing of toad invasion thus were mediated through changes in food supply for both native species and in rates of predation for one species.</description><subject>alien species</subject><subject>Amphibia</subject><subject>Amphibia. Reptilia</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biological invasion</subject><subject>Canes</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Evolutionary ecology</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Lacertilia</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>prey availability</subject><subject>reptile</subject><subject>Snakes</subject><subject>Toads</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LHDEYhkOx0HXbc0-FgBS8jOb3JkdZtBUEL3oOmUyCWWeTaZKp-N-bca2FXvpd8hGe9-XjAeArRme4zTmmgneEUX6GCWLsA1i9_xyBFSJCdZIJ-gkcl7JDCClOyAr01_G3GVyGYT8ZW6EdTQ4-uALrg4M5jW1LHtY0dUN6itDEAfap1rTv5gk6752tjYiw5jQFa0ZYonl0cErTPJoaUiyfwUdvxuK-vL1rcH91ebf92d3c_rjeXtx0ljHMukH1glhJN4j3g3IC06HnGMlBKWGV4JgPzEkikDR974h1nkqJMCVeLCyla3B66J1y-jW7UvU-FOvG0USX5qIbKjlWohlZg5N_0F2ac2zXNYojzqlkC3V-oGxOpWTn9ZTD3uRnjZFenOvFsF4M61fnLfH9rdeU5sJnE20o7zGywYxvuGocP3BPYXTP_6vVV5fbP_3fDrldqSn_7aVMIkkJfQE3tJiS</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Brown, Gregory P.</creator><creator>Ujvari, Beata</creator><creator>Madsen, Thomas</creator><creator>Shine, Richard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations</title><author>Brown, Gregory P. ; Ujvari, Beata ; Madsen, Thomas ; Shine, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>alien species</topic><topic>Amphibia</topic><topic>Amphibia. Reptilia</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biological invasion</topic><topic>Canes</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Evolutionary ecology</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Lacertilia</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>prey availability</topic><topic>reptile</topic><topic>Snakes</topic><topic>Toads</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ujvari, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Gregory P.</au><au>Ujvari, Beata</au><au>Madsen, Thomas</au><au>Shine, Richard</au><au>Harwood, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>351-361</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><coden>FECOE5</coden><abstract>1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairii) and slatey-grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) experience little direct cost or benefit from the arrival of toxic invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), because they rarely eat toads and if they do, are relatively resistant to the toads' toxins. Nonetheless, these snakes could be affected indirectly by toad-induced decreases in the availability of prey (native frogs) and/or by fatal poisoning of the snakes' predators (large varanid lizards). The former (bottom-up) effect predicts decreases in snake body condition, feeding and growth rates after toads arrive, whereas the latter (top-down) effect predicts increases in survival. 3. Our mark—recapture studies on these snakes in tropical Australia (for 7 years before and 7 years after toad arrival) reveal bottom-up effects both on an anurophagous dietary specialist (keelbacks) and a generalist feeder (slatey-grey snakes). 4. Top-down effects of toad arrival were seen in keelbacks but not in slatey-grey snakes, perhaps reflecting the latter's larger body size. 5. Indirect effects coinciding with the timing of toad invasion thus were mediated through changes in food supply for both native species and in rates of predation for one species.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.12044</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.351-361 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328519624 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | alien species Amphibia Amphibia. Reptilia Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Anura Autoecology Biological and medical sciences biological invasion Canes Conservation biology Ecological invasion Ecology Evolutionary ecology Frogs Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Human ecology Lacertilia Population ecology Predators prey availability reptile Snakes Toads Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invader%20impact%20clarifies%20the%20roles%20of%20top-down%20and%20bottom-up%20effects%20on%20tropical%20snake%20populations&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Brown,%20Gregory%20P.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=351-361&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft.coden=FECOE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12044&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23480832%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1350553844&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23480832&rfr_iscdi=true |