Loading…

Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations

1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Functional ecology 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.351-361
Main Authors: Brown, Gregory P., Ujvari, Beata, Madsen, Thomas, Shine, Richard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33
container_end_page 361
container_issue 2
container_start_page 351
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 27
creator Brown, Gregory P.
Ujvari, Beata
Madsen, Thomas
Shine, Richard
description 1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairii) and slatey-grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) experience little direct cost or benefit from the arrival of toxic invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), because they rarely eat toads and if they do, are relatively resistant to the toads' toxins. Nonetheless, these snakes could be affected indirectly by toad-induced decreases in the availability of prey (native frogs) and/or by fatal poisoning of the snakes' predators (large varanid lizards). The former (bottom-up) effect predicts decreases in snake body condition, feeding and growth rates after toads arrive, whereas the latter (top-down) effect predicts increases in survival. 3. Our mark—recapture studies on these snakes in tropical Australia (for 7 years before and 7 years after toad arrival) reveal bottom-up effects both on an anurophagous dietary specialist (keelbacks) and a generalist feeder (slatey-grey snakes). 4. Top-down effects of toad arrival were seen in keelbacks but not in slatey-grey snakes, perhaps reflecting the latter's larger body size. 5. Indirect effects coinciding with the timing of toad invasion thus were mediated through changes in food supply for both native species and in rates of predation for one species.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.12044
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328519624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23480832</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23480832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LHDEYhkOx0HXbc0-FgBS8jOb3JkdZtBUEL3oOmUyCWWeTaZKp-N-bca2FXvpd8hGe9-XjAeArRme4zTmmgneEUX6GCWLsA1i9_xyBFSJCdZIJ-gkcl7JDCClOyAr01_G3GVyGYT8ZW6EdTQ4-uALrg4M5jW1LHtY0dUN6itDEAfap1rTv5gk6752tjYiw5jQFa0ZYonl0cErTPJoaUiyfwUdvxuK-vL1rcH91ebf92d3c_rjeXtx0ljHMukH1glhJN4j3g3IC06HnGMlBKWGV4JgPzEkikDR974h1nkqJMCVeLCyla3B66J1y-jW7UvU-FOvG0USX5qIbKjlWohlZg5N_0F2ac2zXNYojzqlkC3V-oGxOpWTn9ZTD3uRnjZFenOvFsF4M61fnLfH9rdeU5sJnE20o7zGywYxvuGocP3BPYXTP_6vVV5fbP_3fDrldqSn_7aVMIkkJfQE3tJiS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1350553844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Brown, Gregory P. ; Ujvari, Beata ; Madsen, Thomas ; Shine, Richard</creator><contributor>Harwood, James</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P. ; Ujvari, Beata ; Madsen, Thomas ; Shine, Richard ; Harwood, James</creatorcontrib><description>1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairii) and slatey-grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) experience little direct cost or benefit from the arrival of toxic invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), because they rarely eat toads and if they do, are relatively resistant to the toads' toxins. Nonetheless, these snakes could be affected indirectly by toad-induced decreases in the availability of prey (native frogs) and/or by fatal poisoning of the snakes' predators (large varanid lizards). The former (bottom-up) effect predicts decreases in snake body condition, feeding and growth rates after toads arrive, whereas the latter (top-down) effect predicts increases in survival. 3. Our mark—recapture studies on these snakes in tropical Australia (for 7 years before and 7 years after toad arrival) reveal bottom-up effects both on an anurophagous dietary specialist (keelbacks) and a generalist feeder (slatey-grey snakes). 4. Top-down effects of toad arrival were seen in keelbacks but not in slatey-grey snakes, perhaps reflecting the latter's larger body size. 5. Indirect effects coinciding with the timing of toad invasion thus were mediated through changes in food supply for both native species and in rates of predation for one species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECOE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>alien species ; Amphibia ; Amphibia. Reptilia ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Anura ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; biological invasion ; Canes ; Conservation biology ; Ecological invasion ; Ecology ; Evolutionary ecology ; Frogs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Human ecology ; Lacertilia ; Population ecology ; Predators ; prey availability ; reptile ; Snakes ; Toads ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.351-361</ispartof><rights>2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2013 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23480832$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23480832$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27145759$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Harwood, James</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ujvari, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairii) and slatey-grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) experience little direct cost or benefit from the arrival of toxic invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), because they rarely eat toads and if they do, are relatively resistant to the toads' toxins. Nonetheless, these snakes could be affected indirectly by toad-induced decreases in the availability of prey (native frogs) and/or by fatal poisoning of the snakes' predators (large varanid lizards). The former (bottom-up) effect predicts decreases in snake body condition, feeding and growth rates after toads arrive, whereas the latter (top-down) effect predicts increases in survival. 3. Our mark—recapture studies on these snakes in tropical Australia (for 7 years before and 7 years after toad arrival) reveal bottom-up effects both on an anurophagous dietary specialist (keelbacks) and a generalist feeder (slatey-grey snakes). 4. Top-down effects of toad arrival were seen in keelbacks but not in slatey-grey snakes, perhaps reflecting the latter's larger body size. 5. Indirect effects coinciding with the timing of toad invasion thus were mediated through changes in food supply for both native species and in rates of predation for one species.</description><subject>alien species</subject><subject>Amphibia</subject><subject>Amphibia. Reptilia</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biological invasion</subject><subject>Canes</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Evolutionary ecology</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Lacertilia</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>prey availability</subject><subject>reptile</subject><subject>Snakes</subject><subject>Toads</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LHDEYhkOx0HXbc0-FgBS8jOb3JkdZtBUEL3oOmUyCWWeTaZKp-N-bca2FXvpd8hGe9-XjAeArRme4zTmmgneEUX6GCWLsA1i9_xyBFSJCdZIJ-gkcl7JDCClOyAr01_G3GVyGYT8ZW6EdTQ4-uALrg4M5jW1LHtY0dUN6itDEAfap1rTv5gk6752tjYiw5jQFa0ZYonl0cErTPJoaUiyfwUdvxuK-vL1rcH91ebf92d3c_rjeXtx0ljHMukH1glhJN4j3g3IC06HnGMlBKWGV4JgPzEkikDR974h1nkqJMCVeLCyla3B66J1y-jW7UvU-FOvG0USX5qIbKjlWohlZg5N_0F2ac2zXNYojzqlkC3V-oGxOpWTn9ZTD3uRnjZFenOvFsF4M61fnLfH9rdeU5sJnE20o7zGywYxvuGocP3BPYXTP_6vVV5fbP_3fDrldqSn_7aVMIkkJfQE3tJiS</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Brown, Gregory P.</creator><creator>Ujvari, Beata</creator><creator>Madsen, Thomas</creator><creator>Shine, Richard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations</title><author>Brown, Gregory P. ; Ujvari, Beata ; Madsen, Thomas ; Shine, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>alien species</topic><topic>Amphibia</topic><topic>Amphibia. Reptilia</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biological invasion</topic><topic>Canes</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Evolutionary ecology</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Lacertilia</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>prey availability</topic><topic>reptile</topic><topic>Snakes</topic><topic>Toads</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ujvari, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shine, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Gregory P.</au><au>Ujvari, Beata</au><au>Madsen, Thomas</au><au>Shine, Richard</au><au>Harwood, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>351-361</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><coden>FECOE5</coden><abstract>1. Disentangling the effects of prey limitation (bottom-up) and predation (top-down) processes on natural populations is difficult, but the perturbations introduced by an invasive species can provide pseudo-experimental evidence on this issue. 2. In tropical Australia, keelbacks (Tropidonophis mairii) and slatey-grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) experience little direct cost or benefit from the arrival of toxic invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina), because they rarely eat toads and if they do, are relatively resistant to the toads' toxins. Nonetheless, these snakes could be affected indirectly by toad-induced decreases in the availability of prey (native frogs) and/or by fatal poisoning of the snakes' predators (large varanid lizards). The former (bottom-up) effect predicts decreases in snake body condition, feeding and growth rates after toads arrive, whereas the latter (top-down) effect predicts increases in survival. 3. Our mark—recapture studies on these snakes in tropical Australia (for 7 years before and 7 years after toad arrival) reveal bottom-up effects both on an anurophagous dietary specialist (keelbacks) and a generalist feeder (slatey-grey snakes). 4. Top-down effects of toad arrival were seen in keelbacks but not in slatey-grey snakes, perhaps reflecting the latter's larger body size. 5. Indirect effects coinciding with the timing of toad invasion thus were mediated through changes in food supply for both native species and in rates of predation for one species.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.12044</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2013-04, Vol.27 (2), p.351-361
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1328519624
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects alien species
Amphibia
Amphibia. Reptilia
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Anura
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
biological invasion
Canes
Conservation biology
Ecological invasion
Ecology
Evolutionary ecology
Frogs
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Human ecology
Lacertilia
Population ecology
Predators
prey availability
reptile
Snakes
Toads
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
title Invader impact clarifies the roles of top-down and bottom-up effects on tropical snake populations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invader%20impact%20clarifies%20the%20roles%20of%20top-down%20and%20bottom-up%20effects%20on%20tropical%20snake%20populations&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Brown,%20Gregory%20P.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=351-361&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft.coden=FECOE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12044&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23480832%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4414-d9b62c83705bd9e613db5108d996c96515d4e82608abbe2cef3880132f6613d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1350553844&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23480832&rfr_iscdi=true