Loading…

Culturable bacteria from plum fruit surfaces and their potential for controlling brown rot after harvest

Fruit microflora have been the richest source of antagonists against fruit decays and the active ingredient in all currently available commercial biocontrol products. A comprehensive evaluation of plum bacteria for biocontrol activity against Monilinia fructicola, which causes brown rot of stone fru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Postharvest biology and technology 2013-02, Vol.76, p.145-151
Main Authors: Janisiewicz, Wojciech J, Jurick, Wayne M. II, Vico, Ivana, Peter, Kari A, Buyer, Jeffrey S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-15fd4f3901e7c6ee06a0a3d526ec5cb8c19ad5e3badd99ff5e9ff070a4a87c0a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-15fd4f3901e7c6ee06a0a3d526ec5cb8c19ad5e3badd99ff5e9ff070a4a87c0a3
container_end_page 151
container_issue
container_start_page 145
container_title Postharvest biology and technology
container_volume 76
creator Janisiewicz, Wojciech J
Jurick, Wayne M. II
Vico, Ivana
Peter, Kari A
Buyer, Jeffrey S
description Fruit microflora have been the richest source of antagonists against fruit decays and the active ingredient in all currently available commercial biocontrol products. A comprehensive evaluation of plum bacteria for biocontrol activity against Monilinia fructicola, which causes brown rot of stone fruit, is important for determining their biocontrol potential. Resident culturable bacterial microflora of plums from early fruit development until maturity were characterized. The most dominant genera were Curtobacterium (19.88%), Pseudomonas (15.06%), Microbacterium (13.86%), and Clavibacter (12.65%). These genera occurred at all four isolation times and accounted for 61.45% of all isolates. Microbacterium and Curtobacterium dominated at the early stage of fruit development while Pseudomonas and Clavibacter were dominant at the end of the season. Less prevalent genera were Enterobacter (5.42%), Chrysomonas (4.82%), and Pantoea (4.22%). Most frequently isolated species were Microbacterium lacticum, Clavibacter michiganensis, Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Enterobacter intermedius, and Chrysomonas luteola. The seasonal succession of genera was observed in both MANOVA and frequency analysis. Primary and secondary screening of plum-inhabiting bacteria for control of brown rot on wounded fruit resulted in selection of several antagonists among which Pantonea agglomerans and Citrobacter freundii were the most effective. These antagonists grew well in plum wounds and increased by four log units during first three days at 24°C, and two log units after seven days at 4°C. Results indicate that plum microflora are an excellent source of antagonists against brown rot decay originating from wounds after harvest.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.10.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1348489865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925521412002335</els_id><sourcerecordid>1348489865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-15fd4f3901e7c6ee06a0a3d526ec5cb8c19ad5e3badd99ff5e9ff070a4a87c0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BuNB8NJj0p30x1EGVxcWPOieQ3W6spMh02kr6RX_vWlmEU-ylyQkT94qnmLsnRR7KWT78bRfYspHoIfRx30tZF3u90KoZ2wn-66p6ka3z9lODLWudC3VS_YqpZMQQmvd79jxsIa8EowB-Qg2I3ngjuKZL2E9l9PqM08rObCYOMwTz0f0xJeYcc4eAneRuI1zphiCn-_5SPHXzClmDq7E8a03TPk1e-EgJHzzuF-xu-vPPw5fq9tvX24On24rq5o6V1K7SblmEBI72yKKFgQ0k65btNqOvZUDTBqbEaZpGJzTWBbRCVDQd7agV-zDJXeh-HMthc3ZJ4shwIxxTUY2qlf90Le6oMMFtRRTInRmIX8G-m2kMJtdczL_2DWb3e2p2C1_3z-WgWQhOILZ-vQ3oO5k3Ra8cG8vnINo4J4Kc_e9BKkygTIZ3f-XkJ1SG3G4EFi8PXgkk6zH2eLkCW02U_RP6PgPCqqsDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1348489865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Culturable bacteria from plum fruit surfaces and their potential for controlling brown rot after harvest</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Janisiewicz, Wojciech J ; Jurick, Wayne M. II ; Vico, Ivana ; Peter, Kari A ; Buyer, Jeffrey S</creator><creatorcontrib>Janisiewicz, Wojciech J ; Jurick, Wayne M. II ; Vico, Ivana ; Peter, Kari A ; Buyer, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><description>Fruit microflora have been the richest source of antagonists against fruit decays and the active ingredient in all currently available commercial biocontrol products. A comprehensive evaluation of plum bacteria for biocontrol activity against Monilinia fructicola, which causes brown rot of stone fruit, is important for determining their biocontrol potential. Resident culturable bacterial microflora of plums from early fruit development until maturity were characterized. The most dominant genera were Curtobacterium (19.88%), Pseudomonas (15.06%), Microbacterium (13.86%), and Clavibacter (12.65%). These genera occurred at all four isolation times and accounted for 61.45% of all isolates. Microbacterium and Curtobacterium dominated at the early stage of fruit development while Pseudomonas and Clavibacter were dominant at the end of the season. Less prevalent genera were Enterobacter (5.42%), Chrysomonas (4.82%), and Pantoea (4.22%). Most frequently isolated species were Microbacterium lacticum, Clavibacter michiganensis, Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Enterobacter intermedius, and Chrysomonas luteola. The seasonal succession of genera was observed in both MANOVA and frequency analysis. Primary and secondary screening of plum-inhabiting bacteria for control of brown rot on wounded fruit resulted in selection of several antagonists among which Pantonea agglomerans and Citrobacter freundii were the most effective. These antagonists grew well in plum wounds and increased by four log units during first three days at 24°C, and two log units after seven days at 4°C. Results indicate that plum microflora are an excellent source of antagonists against brown rot decay originating from wounds after harvest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.10.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>active ingredients ; antagonists ; bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological control ; Citrobacter freundii ; Clavibacter michiganensis ; Curtobacterium ; Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens ; developmental stages ; early development ; Enterobacter ; Enterobacter intermedius ; Food industries ; Fruit and vegetable industries ; Fruit microflora ; fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungal plant pathogens ; Microbacterium ; Microbacterium lacticum ; Monilinia fructicola ; Pantoea ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; plant rots ; plums ; Postharvest biocontrol ; Prunus ; Pseudomonas ; Resident microflora ; Stone fruits</subject><ispartof>Postharvest biology and technology, 2013-02, Vol.76, p.145-151</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-15fd4f3901e7c6ee06a0a3d526ec5cb8c19ad5e3badd99ff5e9ff070a4a87c0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-15fd4f3901e7c6ee06a0a3d526ec5cb8c19ad5e3badd99ff5e9ff070a4a87c0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27126012$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janisiewicz, Wojciech J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurick, Wayne M. II</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vico, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Kari A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buyer, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><title>Culturable bacteria from plum fruit surfaces and their potential for controlling brown rot after harvest</title><title>Postharvest biology and technology</title><description>Fruit microflora have been the richest source of antagonists against fruit decays and the active ingredient in all currently available commercial biocontrol products. A comprehensive evaluation of plum bacteria for biocontrol activity against Monilinia fructicola, which causes brown rot of stone fruit, is important for determining their biocontrol potential. Resident culturable bacterial microflora of plums from early fruit development until maturity were characterized. The most dominant genera were Curtobacterium (19.88%), Pseudomonas (15.06%), Microbacterium (13.86%), and Clavibacter (12.65%). These genera occurred at all four isolation times and accounted for 61.45% of all isolates. Microbacterium and Curtobacterium dominated at the early stage of fruit development while Pseudomonas and Clavibacter were dominant at the end of the season. Less prevalent genera were Enterobacter (5.42%), Chrysomonas (4.82%), and Pantoea (4.22%). Most frequently isolated species were Microbacterium lacticum, Clavibacter michiganensis, Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Enterobacter intermedius, and Chrysomonas luteola. The seasonal succession of genera was observed in both MANOVA and frequency analysis. Primary and secondary screening of plum-inhabiting bacteria for control of brown rot on wounded fruit resulted in selection of several antagonists among which Pantonea agglomerans and Citrobacter freundii were the most effective. These antagonists grew well in plum wounds and increased by four log units during first three days at 24°C, and two log units after seven days at 4°C. Results indicate that plum microflora are an excellent source of antagonists against brown rot decay originating from wounds after harvest.</description><subject>active ingredients</subject><subject>antagonists</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Citrobacter freundii</subject><subject>Clavibacter michiganensis</subject><subject>Curtobacterium</subject><subject>Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens</subject><subject>developmental stages</subject><subject>early development</subject><subject>Enterobacter</subject><subject>Enterobacter intermedius</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fruit and vegetable industries</subject><subject>Fruit microflora</subject><subject>fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungal plant pathogens</subject><subject>Microbacterium</subject><subject>Microbacterium lacticum</subject><subject>Monilinia fructicola</subject><subject>Pantoea</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>plant rots</subject><subject>plums</subject><subject>Postharvest biocontrol</subject><subject>Prunus</subject><subject>Pseudomonas</subject><subject>Resident microflora</subject><subject>Stone fruits</subject><issn>0925-5214</issn><issn>1873-2356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BuNB8NJj0p30x1EGVxcWPOieQ3W6spMh02kr6RX_vWlmEU-ylyQkT94qnmLsnRR7KWT78bRfYspHoIfRx30tZF3u90KoZ2wn-66p6ka3z9lODLWudC3VS_YqpZMQQmvd79jxsIa8EowB-Qg2I3ngjuKZL2E9l9PqM08rObCYOMwTz0f0xJeYcc4eAneRuI1zphiCn-_5SPHXzClmDq7E8a03TPk1e-EgJHzzuF-xu-vPPw5fq9tvX24On24rq5o6V1K7SblmEBI72yKKFgQ0k65btNqOvZUDTBqbEaZpGJzTWBbRCVDQd7agV-zDJXeh-HMthc3ZJ4shwIxxTUY2qlf90Le6oMMFtRRTInRmIX8G-m2kMJtdczL_2DWb3e2p2C1_3z-WgWQhOILZ-vQ3oO5k3Ra8cG8vnINo4J4Kc_e9BKkygTIZ3f-XkJ1SG3G4EFi8PXgkk6zH2eLkCW02U_RP6PgPCqqsDA</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Janisiewicz, Wojciech J</creator><creator>Jurick, Wayne M. II</creator><creator>Vico, Ivana</creator><creator>Peter, Kari A</creator><creator>Buyer, Jeffrey S</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Culturable bacteria from plum fruit surfaces and their potential for controlling brown rot after harvest</title><author>Janisiewicz, Wojciech J ; Jurick, Wayne M. II ; Vico, Ivana ; Peter, Kari A ; Buyer, Jeffrey S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-15fd4f3901e7c6ee06a0a3d526ec5cb8c19ad5e3badd99ff5e9ff070a4a87c0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>active ingredients</topic><topic>antagonists</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Citrobacter freundii</topic><topic>Clavibacter michiganensis</topic><topic>Curtobacterium</topic><topic>Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens</topic><topic>developmental stages</topic><topic>early development</topic><topic>Enterobacter</topic><topic>Enterobacter intermedius</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fruit and vegetable industries</topic><topic>Fruit microflora</topic><topic>fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungal plant pathogens</topic><topic>Microbacterium</topic><topic>Microbacterium lacticum</topic><topic>Monilinia fructicola</topic><topic>Pantoea</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>plant rots</topic><topic>plums</topic><topic>Postharvest biocontrol</topic><topic>Prunus</topic><topic>Pseudomonas</topic><topic>Resident microflora</topic><topic>Stone fruits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janisiewicz, Wojciech J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurick, Wayne M. II</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vico, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Kari A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buyer, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Postharvest biology and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janisiewicz, Wojciech J</au><au>Jurick, Wayne M. II</au><au>Vico, Ivana</au><au>Peter, Kari A</au><au>Buyer, Jeffrey S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Culturable bacteria from plum fruit surfaces and their potential for controlling brown rot after harvest</atitle><jtitle>Postharvest biology and technology</jtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>76</volume><spage>145</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>145-151</pages><issn>0925-5214</issn><eissn>1873-2356</eissn><abstract>Fruit microflora have been the richest source of antagonists against fruit decays and the active ingredient in all currently available commercial biocontrol products. A comprehensive evaluation of plum bacteria for biocontrol activity against Monilinia fructicola, which causes brown rot of stone fruit, is important for determining their biocontrol potential. Resident culturable bacterial microflora of plums from early fruit development until maturity were characterized. The most dominant genera were Curtobacterium (19.88%), Pseudomonas (15.06%), Microbacterium (13.86%), and Clavibacter (12.65%). These genera occurred at all four isolation times and accounted for 61.45% of all isolates. Microbacterium and Curtobacterium dominated at the early stage of fruit development while Pseudomonas and Clavibacter were dominant at the end of the season. Less prevalent genera were Enterobacter (5.42%), Chrysomonas (4.82%), and Pantoea (4.22%). Most frequently isolated species were Microbacterium lacticum, Clavibacter michiganensis, Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Enterobacter intermedius, and Chrysomonas luteola. The seasonal succession of genera was observed in both MANOVA and frequency analysis. Primary and secondary screening of plum-inhabiting bacteria for control of brown rot on wounded fruit resulted in selection of several antagonists among which Pantonea agglomerans and Citrobacter freundii were the most effective. These antagonists grew well in plum wounds and increased by four log units during first three days at 24°C, and two log units after seven days at 4°C. Results indicate that plum microflora are an excellent source of antagonists against brown rot decay originating from wounds after harvest.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.10.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-5214
ispartof Postharvest biology and technology, 2013-02, Vol.76, p.145-151
issn 0925-5214
1873-2356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1348489865
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects active ingredients
antagonists
bacteria
Biological and medical sciences
Biological control
Citrobacter freundii
Clavibacter michiganensis
Curtobacterium
Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens
developmental stages
early development
Enterobacter
Enterobacter intermedius
Food industries
Fruit and vegetable industries
Fruit microflora
fruits
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fungal plant pathogens
Microbacterium
Microbacterium lacticum
Monilinia fructicola
Pantoea
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
plant rots
plums
Postharvest biocontrol
Prunus
Pseudomonas
Resident microflora
Stone fruits
title Culturable bacteria from plum fruit surfaces and their potential for controlling brown rot after harvest
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A57%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Culturable%20bacteria%20from%20plum%20fruit%20surfaces%20and%20their%20potential%20for%20controlling%20brown%20rot%20after%20harvest&rft.jtitle=Postharvest%20biology%20and%20technology&rft.au=Janisiewicz,%20Wojciech%20J&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=76&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=145-151&rft.issn=0925-5214&rft.eissn=1873-2356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1348489865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-15fd4f3901e7c6ee06a0a3d526ec5cb8c19ad5e3badd99ff5e9ff070a4a87c0a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1348489865&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true