Loading…

Collagen hemostat significantly reduces time to hemostasis compared with cellulose: COBBANA, a single-center, randomized trial

Abstract Background This single-center, randomized trial compares the hemostatic effectiveness of microfibrillar collagen and oxidized cellulose in arterial bypass surgery. Methods In patients undergoing arterial bypass surgery, 2 hemostats, microfibrillar collagen and oxidized cellulose, were rando...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery 2013-06, Vol.205 (6), p.636-641
Main Authors: Qerimi, Bekim, Baumann, Petra, Ph.D, Hüsing, Johannes, Ph.D, Knaebel, Hanns-Peter, M.D, Schumacher, Hardy, M.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background This single-center, randomized trial compares the hemostatic effectiveness of microfibrillar collagen and oxidized cellulose in arterial bypass surgery. Methods In patients undergoing arterial bypass surgery, 2 hemostats, microfibrillar collagen and oxidized cellulose, were randomly used to achieve hemostasis. The primary endpoint was the time to hemostasis. The secondary endpoints were the complication rate, mortality, number of hemostats required, handling, and adhesion. Results Collagen achieved hemostasis significantly faster than cellulose, with considerably less hemostats. In addition, its ease of use was rated substantially better. Conclusion In arterial bypass surgery, microfibrillar collagen is more effective than oxidized cellulose in achieving hemostasis.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.033