The Great Fructose Debate

[...]most of the fructose in HFCS is free, or unbound, which primes it for absorption. [...]HFCS began replacingsugar in processed foods, in the mid-1970s, free fructose was mainly consumed in fruit. When analyzing data from a dietary intervention in Type 2 diabetics, Toronto researchers found that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology today 2013-05, Vol.46 (3), p.42
Main Author: Carnell, Susan
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:English
Subjects:
Corn syrup
Debates
Diet
Fruits
Glucose
Liver diseases
Nutrition
Obesity
Overweight
Pancreas
Pancreatic cancer
Studies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 42
container_title Psychology today
container_volume 46
creator Carnell, Susan
description [...]most of the fructose in HFCS is free, or unbound, which primes it for absorption. [...]HFCS began replacingsugar in processed foods, in the mid-1970s, free fructose was mainly consumed in fruit. When analyzing data from a dietary intervention in Type 2 diabetics, Toronto researchers found that consuming two extra servings of fruit with a low glycémie index -typically those grown in temperate climates (apples, pears, citrus fruit, berries, peaches, nectarines, and plums)improved glucose control, lipid levels, and blood pressure.
format magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1355485026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2980224931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13554850263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjSz1DUyMjVhYeA0MDA21jU2NDDnYOAqLs4yAAJDE1NOBsmQjFQF96LUxBIFt6LS5JL84lQFl9SkxJJUHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoOHmGuLsoVtQlF9YmlpcEp-bWZycmpOTmJeaX1ocb2hsampiYWpgZGZMglIA_SMvMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1355485026</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>The Great Fructose Debate</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Carnell, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Carnell, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>[...]most of the fructose in HFCS is free, or unbound, which primes it for absorption. [...]HFCS began replacingsugar in processed foods, in the mid-1970s, free fructose was mainly consumed in fruit. When analyzing data from a dietary intervention in Type 2 diabetics, Toronto researchers found that consuming two extra servings of fruit with a low glycémie index -typically those grown in temperate climates (apples, pears, citrus fruit, berries, peaches, nectarines, and plums)improved glucose control, lipid levels, and blood pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-2254</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSTOAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Sussex Publishers, LLC</publisher><subject>Corn syrup ; Debates ; Diet ; Fruits ; Glucose ; Liver diseases ; Nutrition ; Obesity ; Overweight ; Pancreas ; Pancreatic cancer ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Psychology today, 2013-05, Vol.46 (3), p.42</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sussex Publishers, LLC Jun 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1355485026?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>777,781,13484,21415,33593,36042,43714,44344</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carnell, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>The Great Fructose Debate</title><title>Psychology today</title><description>[...]most of the fructose in HFCS is free, or unbound, which primes it for absorption. [...]HFCS began replacingsugar in processed foods, in the mid-1970s, free fructose was mainly consumed in fruit. When analyzing data from a dietary intervention in Type 2 diabetics, Toronto researchers found that consuming two extra servings of fruit with a low glycémie index -typically those grown in temperate climates (apples, pears, citrus fruit, berries, peaches, nectarines, and plums)improved glucose control, lipid levels, and blood pressure.</description><subject>Corn syrup</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0033-3107</issn><issn>2169-2254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjSz1DUyMjVhYeA0MDA21jU2NDDnYOAqLs4yAAJDE1NOBsmQjFQF96LUxBIFt6LS5JL84lQFl9SkxJJUHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoOHmGuLsoVtQlF9YmlpcEp-bWZycmpOTmJeaX1ocb2hsampiYWpgZGZMglIA_SMvMA</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Carnell, Susan</creator><general>Sussex Publishers, LLC</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>The Great Fructose Debate</title><author>Carnell, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13554850263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Corn syrup</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carnell, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Psychology today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carnell, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Great Fructose Debate</atitle><jtitle>Psychology today</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>42</spage><pages>42-</pages><issn>0033-3107</issn><eissn>2169-2254</eissn><coden>PSTOAM</coden><abstract>[...]most of the fructose in HFCS is free, or unbound, which primes it for absorption. [...]HFCS began replacingsugar in processed foods, in the mid-1970s, free fructose was mainly consumed in fruit. When analyzing data from a dietary intervention in Type 2 diabetics, Toronto researchers found that consuming two extra servings of fruit with a low glycémie index -typically those grown in temperate climates (apples, pears, citrus fruit, berries, peaches, nectarines, and plums)improved glucose control, lipid levels, and blood pressure.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Sussex Publishers, LLC</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3107
ispartof Psychology today, 2013-05, Vol.46 (3), p.42
issn 0033-3107
2169-2254
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1355485026
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Corn syrup
Debates
Diet
Fruits
Glucose
Liver diseases
Nutrition
Obesity
Overweight
Pancreas
Pancreatic cancer
Studies
title The Great Fructose Debate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A59%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Great%20Fructose%20Debate&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20today&rft.au=Carnell,%20Susan&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=42&rft.pages=42-&rft.issn=0033-3107&rft.eissn=2169-2254&rft.coden=PSTOAM&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2980224931%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13554850263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1355485026&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true