Loading…
Clinical evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis guides the decision to anticoagulate prophylactically but does not impact the decision to perform after hours duplex venous scanning or increase its yield
Objective The utility of after-hours duplex venous scanning (DVS) for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in emergency department (ED) patients has been debated. Availability of safe prophylactic low molecular weight heparin, cost containment efforts, and retention of scarce sonographers have to be...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2013-06, Vol.57 (6), p.1597-1602 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f62ac4bde16f1ec6f0131d289dc1b4997ba440848fcfe9af33ce1f53c883f2f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f62ac4bde16f1ec6f0131d289dc1b4997ba440848fcfe9af33ce1f53c883f2f3 |
container_end_page | 1602 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1597 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Go, Michael R., MD Kiser, Dennis, RVT Wald, Patrick, MS Haurani, Mounir J., MD Moseley, Mark, MD, MHA Satiani, Bhagwan, MD, MBA |
description | Objective The utility of after-hours duplex venous scanning (DVS) for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in emergency department (ED) patients has been debated. Availability of safe prophylactic low molecular weight heparin, cost containment efforts, and retention of scarce sonographers have to be balanced against 24/7 demand for services. We determined the incidence of DVT in DVS ordered after-hours, correlation between Wells' score and prophylactic anticoagulation as well as urgently performed DVS, and complications of delaying DVS until regular hours. Methods Records of all ED encounters between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010 associated with a DVS ordered after-hours were reviewed. The decisions to prophylactically anticoagulate and whether to perform DVS urgently or delayed until regular hours were at the discretion of the ED physician and a vascular surgeon. DVS findings, number of urgent and delayed studies, Wells' scores, D-dimers, and outcomes were recorded. Results DVT was found in 12% (22) of 181 DVS ordered after-hours. DVT was found in 19% of 42 DVS done urgently and in 10% of 139 DVS delayed an average 10 hours 17 minutes ( P = NS). All patients had Wells' scores and 43 had D-dimers. Furthermore, 76% of patients with a Wells' score ≥3 had prophylactic anticoagulation whereas only 39% of patients with a Wells' score |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.076 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1357495068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521412025967</els_id><sourcerecordid>1357495068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f62ac4bde16f1ec6f0131d289dc1b4997ba440848fcfe9af33ce1f53c883f2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsuqFDEQbUTxjlc_wI1k6WbaVPqNIMjgCy64UNchnVRmMqaTNkkPd_7STzLNjC4UXAWqzjmpqnOK4jnQEii0r47l8RRLRoGVACXt2gfFBujQbdueDg-LDe1q2DYM6pviSYxHSgGavntc3LCqGhpGh03xc2eNM1JYgidhF5GMd8RrEpc4o0yoiEKcyQmNI-kQ_DT6aCLZL0ZhzBXMfWniykqeCJeM9GK_WJGQzMHPh7MVMq0f2DMZl0SUzzznEzHTnDv_SMwYtA8TETphIAe_hEjUMlu8z0M4v0QSpXDOuD3xgRgnA4qIxKRIzgatelo80sJGfHZ9b4tv79993X3c3n3-8Gn39m4r6wbSttItE7IeFUKrAWWrKVSgWD8oCWM9DN0o6pr2da-lxkHoqpIIuqlk31ea6eq2eHnRzVv-WDAmPpko0VrhME_JoWq6emho22coXKAy-BgDaj4HM4lw5kD5aiQ_8mwkX43kADwbmTkvrvLLOKH6w_jtXAa8vgAwL3kyGHiUBp1EZUI2jitv_iv_5i-2vObgO54xHvPZXb4eBx4Zp_zLmqQ1SMAoa4a2q34BYkfKfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1357495068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis guides the decision to anticoagulate prophylactically but does not impact the decision to perform after hours duplex venous scanning or increase its yield</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><creator>Go, Michael R., MD ; Kiser, Dennis, RVT ; Wald, Patrick, MS ; Haurani, Mounir J., MD ; Moseley, Mark, MD, MHA ; Satiani, Bhagwan, MD, MBA</creator><creatorcontrib>Go, Michael R., MD ; Kiser, Dennis, RVT ; Wald, Patrick, MS ; Haurani, Mounir J., MD ; Moseley, Mark, MD, MHA ; Satiani, Bhagwan, MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The utility of after-hours duplex venous scanning (DVS) for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in emergency department (ED) patients has been debated. Availability of safe prophylactic low molecular weight heparin, cost containment efforts, and retention of scarce sonographers have to be balanced against 24/7 demand for services. We determined the incidence of DVT in DVS ordered after-hours, correlation between Wells' score and prophylactic anticoagulation as well as urgently performed DVS, and complications of delaying DVS until regular hours. Methods Records of all ED encounters between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010 associated with a DVS ordered after-hours were reviewed. The decisions to prophylactically anticoagulate and whether to perform DVS urgently or delayed until regular hours were at the discretion of the ED physician and a vascular surgeon. DVS findings, number of urgent and delayed studies, Wells' scores, D-dimers, and outcomes were recorded. Results DVT was found in 12% (22) of 181 DVS ordered after-hours. DVT was found in 19% of 42 DVS done urgently and in 10% of 139 DVS delayed an average 10 hours 17 minutes ( P = NS). All patients had Wells' scores and 43 had D-dimers. Furthermore, 76% of patients with a Wells' score ≥3 had prophylactic anticoagulation whereas only 39% of patients with a Wells' score <3 had prophylactic anticoagulation ( P = .0001). In contrast, 36% of patients with a Wells' score ≥3 had urgent DVS and 20% of patients with a Wells' score <3 had urgent DVS ( P = NS). Prophylactic anticoagulation was given to 86% of patients eventually found to have DVT vs 40% of patients eventually found to have no DVT ( P < .0001). There were no pulmonary emboli or bleeding complications. Conclusions The incidence of DVT in ED patients who had urgent after-hours DVS was no different than in those whose DVS was delayed until regular hours. High pretest probability can be achieved with clinical evaluation prior to DVS, and this guided the decision to prophylactically anticoagulate but did not impact the decision to perform urgent DVS. Most patients eventually found to have DVT did receive prophylactic anticoagulation, and delay of DVS did not result in complications. We believe that most patients in whom there is high clinical suspicion for DVT can safely get prophylactic anticoagulation and delayed DVS. Patients in whom there is low clinical suspicion should not get urgent DVS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23395209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>After-Hours Care ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Emergencies ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis ; Venous Thrombosis - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2013-06, Vol.57 (6), p.1597-1602</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2013 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f62ac4bde16f1ec6f0131d289dc1b4997ba440848fcfe9af33ce1f53c883f2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f62ac4bde16f1ec6f0131d289dc1b4997ba440848fcfe9af33ce1f53c883f2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23395209$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Go, Michael R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiser, Dennis, RVT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wald, Patrick, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haurani, Mounir J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, Mark, MD, MHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satiani, Bhagwan, MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis guides the decision to anticoagulate prophylactically but does not impact the decision to perform after hours duplex venous scanning or increase its yield</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective The utility of after-hours duplex venous scanning (DVS) for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in emergency department (ED) patients has been debated. Availability of safe prophylactic low molecular weight heparin, cost containment efforts, and retention of scarce sonographers have to be balanced against 24/7 demand for services. We determined the incidence of DVT in DVS ordered after-hours, correlation between Wells' score and prophylactic anticoagulation as well as urgently performed DVS, and complications of delaying DVS until regular hours. Methods Records of all ED encounters between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010 associated with a DVS ordered after-hours were reviewed. The decisions to prophylactically anticoagulate and whether to perform DVS urgently or delayed until regular hours were at the discretion of the ED physician and a vascular surgeon. DVS findings, number of urgent and delayed studies, Wells' scores, D-dimers, and outcomes were recorded. Results DVT was found in 12% (22) of 181 DVS ordered after-hours. DVT was found in 19% of 42 DVS done urgently and in 10% of 139 DVS delayed an average 10 hours 17 minutes ( P = NS). All patients had Wells' scores and 43 had D-dimers. Furthermore, 76% of patients with a Wells' score ≥3 had prophylactic anticoagulation whereas only 39% of patients with a Wells' score <3 had prophylactic anticoagulation ( P = .0001). In contrast, 36% of patients with a Wells' score ≥3 had urgent DVS and 20% of patients with a Wells' score <3 had urgent DVS ( P = NS). Prophylactic anticoagulation was given to 86% of patients eventually found to have DVT vs 40% of patients eventually found to have no DVT ( P < .0001). There were no pulmonary emboli or bleeding complications. Conclusions The incidence of DVT in ED patients who had urgent after-hours DVS was no different than in those whose DVS was delayed until regular hours. High pretest probability can be achieved with clinical evaluation prior to DVS, and this guided the decision to prophylactically anticoagulate but did not impact the decision to perform urgent DVS. Most patients eventually found to have DVT did receive prophylactic anticoagulation, and delay of DVS did not result in complications. We believe that most patients in whom there is high clinical suspicion for DVT can safely get prophylactic anticoagulation and delayed DVS. Patients in whom there is low clinical suspicion should not get urgent DVS.</description><subject>After-Hours Care</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - prevention & control</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UsuqFDEQbUTxjlc_wI1k6WbaVPqNIMjgCy64UNchnVRmMqaTNkkPd_7STzLNjC4UXAWqzjmpqnOK4jnQEii0r47l8RRLRoGVACXt2gfFBujQbdueDg-LDe1q2DYM6pviSYxHSgGavntc3LCqGhpGh03xc2eNM1JYgidhF5GMd8RrEpc4o0yoiEKcyQmNI-kQ_DT6aCLZL0ZhzBXMfWniykqeCJeM9GK_WJGQzMHPh7MVMq0f2DMZl0SUzzznEzHTnDv_SMwYtA8TETphIAe_hEjUMlu8z0M4v0QSpXDOuD3xgRgnA4qIxKRIzgatelo80sJGfHZ9b4tv79993X3c3n3-8Gn39m4r6wbSttItE7IeFUKrAWWrKVSgWD8oCWM9DN0o6pr2da-lxkHoqpIIuqlk31ea6eq2eHnRzVv-WDAmPpko0VrhME_JoWq6emho22coXKAy-BgDaj4HM4lw5kD5aiQ_8mwkX43kADwbmTkvrvLLOKH6w_jtXAa8vgAwL3kyGHiUBp1EZUI2jitv_iv_5i-2vObgO54xHvPZXb4eBx4Zp_zLmqQ1SMAoa4a2q34BYkfKfw</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Go, Michael R., MD</creator><creator>Kiser, Dennis, RVT</creator><creator>Wald, Patrick, MS</creator><creator>Haurani, Mounir J., MD</creator><creator>Moseley, Mark, MD, MHA</creator><creator>Satiani, Bhagwan, MD, MBA</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Clinical evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis guides the decision to anticoagulate prophylactically but does not impact the decision to perform after hours duplex venous scanning or increase its yield</title><author>Go, Michael R., MD ; Kiser, Dennis, RVT ; Wald, Patrick, MS ; Haurani, Mounir J., MD ; Moseley, Mark, MD, MHA ; Satiani, Bhagwan, MD, MBA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f62ac4bde16f1ec6f0131d289dc1b4997ba440848fcfe9af33ce1f53c883f2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>After-Hours Care</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Go, Michael R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiser, Dennis, RVT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wald, Patrick, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haurani, Mounir J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, Mark, MD, MHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satiani, Bhagwan, MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Go, Michael R., MD</au><au>Kiser, Dennis, RVT</au><au>Wald, Patrick, MS</au><au>Haurani, Mounir J., MD</au><au>Moseley, Mark, MD, MHA</au><au>Satiani, Bhagwan, MD, MBA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis guides the decision to anticoagulate prophylactically but does not impact the decision to perform after hours duplex venous scanning or increase its yield</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1597</spage><epage>1602</epage><pages>1597-1602</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Objective The utility of after-hours duplex venous scanning (DVS) for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in emergency department (ED) patients has been debated. Availability of safe prophylactic low molecular weight heparin, cost containment efforts, and retention of scarce sonographers have to be balanced against 24/7 demand for services. We determined the incidence of DVT in DVS ordered after-hours, correlation between Wells' score and prophylactic anticoagulation as well as urgently performed DVS, and complications of delaying DVS until regular hours. Methods Records of all ED encounters between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010 associated with a DVS ordered after-hours were reviewed. The decisions to prophylactically anticoagulate and whether to perform DVS urgently or delayed until regular hours were at the discretion of the ED physician and a vascular surgeon. DVS findings, number of urgent and delayed studies, Wells' scores, D-dimers, and outcomes were recorded. Results DVT was found in 12% (22) of 181 DVS ordered after-hours. DVT was found in 19% of 42 DVS done urgently and in 10% of 139 DVS delayed an average 10 hours 17 minutes ( P = NS). All patients had Wells' scores and 43 had D-dimers. Furthermore, 76% of patients with a Wells' score ≥3 had prophylactic anticoagulation whereas only 39% of patients with a Wells' score <3 had prophylactic anticoagulation ( P = .0001). In contrast, 36% of patients with a Wells' score ≥3 had urgent DVS and 20% of patients with a Wells' score <3 had urgent DVS ( P = NS). Prophylactic anticoagulation was given to 86% of patients eventually found to have DVT vs 40% of patients eventually found to have no DVT ( P < .0001). There were no pulmonary emboli or bleeding complications. Conclusions The incidence of DVT in ED patients who had urgent after-hours DVS was no different than in those whose DVS was delayed until regular hours. High pretest probability can be achieved with clinical evaluation prior to DVS, and this guided the decision to prophylactically anticoagulate but did not impact the decision to perform urgent DVS. Most patients eventually found to have DVT did receive prophylactic anticoagulation, and delay of DVS did not result in complications. We believe that most patients in whom there is high clinical suspicion for DVT can safely get prophylactic anticoagulation and delayed DVS. Patients in whom there is low clinical suspicion should not get urgent DVS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>23395209</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.076</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2013-06, Vol.57 (6), p.1597-1602 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1357495068 |
source | BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS |
subjects | After-Hours Care Anticoagulants - therapeutic use Emergencies Humans Retrospective Studies Surgery Ultrasonography, Interventional Venous Thrombosis - diagnosis Venous Thrombosis - prevention & control |
title | Clinical evaluation of suspected deep vein thrombosis guides the decision to anticoagulate prophylactically but does not impact the decision to perform after hours duplex venous scanning or increase its yield |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-05T02%3A39%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20evaluation%20of%20suspected%20deep%20vein%20thrombosis%20guides%20the%20decision%20to%20anticoagulate%20prophylactically%20but%20does%20not%20impact%20the%20decision%20to%20perform%20after%20hours%20duplex%20venous%20scanning%20or%20increase%20its%20yield&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Go,%20Michael%20R.,%20MD&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1597&rft.epage=1602&rft.pages=1597-1602&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1357495068%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-3f62ac4bde16f1ec6f0131d289dc1b4997ba440848fcfe9af33ce1f53c883f2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1357495068&rft_id=info:pmid/23395209&rfr_iscdi=true |