Loading…

Enteral nutrition is associated with improved outcome in patients with severe sepsis: A secondary analysis of the VISEP trial

Introduction The optimal nutritional strategy remains controversial, particularly in severely septic patients. Our aim was to analyze the effect of three nutritional strategies—enteral (EN), parenteral (PN), and combined nutrition (EN+PN)—on the outcome of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2013-04, Vol.108 (3), p.223-233
Main Authors: Elke, G., Kuhnt, E., Ragaller, M., Schädler, D., Frerichs, I., Brunkhorst, F.M., Löffler, M., Reinhart, K., Weiler, N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction The optimal nutritional strategy remains controversial, particularly in severely septic patients. Our aim was to analyze the effect of three nutritional strategies—enteral (EN), parenteral (PN), and combined nutrition (EN+PN)—on the outcome of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Patients and methods This secondary analysis of the prospective, randomized–controlled, multicenter “Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis (VISEP)” trial only included patients with a length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) of more than 7 days. Besides patient characteristics, data on nutrition therapy were collected daily for up to 21 days. Morbidity as measured by the mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, incidence of secondary infections, renal replacement therapy, ventilator-free days and severe hypoglycemia, length of ICU stay, and mortality at 90 days were compared between the three nutritional strategies. Results In all, 353 patients were included in the analysis with the majority (68.5 %) receiving EN+PN, 24.4 % receiving EN, and only 7.1 % receiving PN. Median caloric intake was 918 kcal/day (EN), 1,210 kcal/day (PN), and 1,343 kcal/day (EN+PN; p 
ISSN:2193-6218
2193-6226
DOI:10.1007/s00063-013-0224-4