Loading…
Evaluation of bleached kraft mill process water using Microtox, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and Menidia beryllina toxicity tests
To determine whether a 7- to 10-d embryo toxicity/teratogenicity test with the inland silverside fish, Menidia beryllina, is a sensitive indicator for evaluation of bleached kraft mill effluents, we compared this test with the Microtox(R) 15-min acute toxicity test and the Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-d chr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology 1997-05, Vol.32 (4), p.367-375 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-2e79036df91978238185239f837b1f0400db3431f584f424553f419587fd132d3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 375 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Middaugh, D.P. (U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL.) Beckham, N Fournie, J.W Deardorff, T.L |
description | To determine whether a 7- to 10-d embryo toxicity/teratogenicity test with the inland silverside fish, Menidia beryllina, is a sensitive indicator for evaluation of bleached kraft mill effluents, we compared this test with the Microtox(R) 15-min acute toxicity test and the Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-d chronic toxicity test. Water samples used in each test were collected from three areas in a bleached kraft pulp and paper mill using a 100% chlorine dioxide bleaching process: 1) river water prior to use in the mill; 2) the combined acid/base waste stream from the pulping process prior to biological treatment in the aerated stabilization basin (ASB); and 3) the effluent from the ASB with a retention time of approximately 11 d. Relative toxicity determined by the three tests for each water sampling location was compared. All three toxicity tests were predictive indicators of toxicity; however, the C. dubia and M. beryllina tests were the more similar and sensitive indicators of toxicity. Process water (ASB influent) prior to biological treatment in the ASB was toxic at all concentrations using the Microtox(R) and C. dubia tests. The fish embryo test showed no toxicity at 1% concentrations, slight toxicity at 10%, and acute toxicity at the 100% ASB influent concentration. Tests with biologically-treated ASB effluent indicated a substantial reduction in observed toxicity to Microtox(R) bacteria, C. dubia, and M. beryllina. No toxic responses were observed in any test at a 1% ASB effluent concentration which was the approximate effluent concentration in the receiving river following mixing. No relationship was found among any toxicological response and effluent levels of adsorbable organic halides, polychlorinated phenolic compounds, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran, total suspended solids, color, chemical oxygen demand, or total organic carbon. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s002449900198 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13628462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3278914631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-2e79036df91978238185239f837b1f0400db3431f584f424553f419587fd132d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c9rFDEUB_AgSl2rRy-CEFA8dfQlL9kkx7LUH9DiQXseMpOkTc1m1mRGu_-9kV0KegrkfXjJly8hLxm8ZwDqQwXgQhgDwIx-RFZMIO9AAT4mKwADnUDBnpJntd41wrUWJ-TEMCUlsBW5v_hl02LnOGU6BTokb8db7-iPYsNMtzEluivT6Gulv-3sC11qzDf0Ko5lmqf7M7rxJU7O7m5ztNQtQ7Rn1GZHr3yOrl0NvuxTitnSxuMY5z2dfZ3rc_Ik2FT9i-N5Sq4_XnzffO4uv376sjm_7EY0cu64VwZw7YJhRmmOmmnJ0QSNamABBIAbUCALUosguJASg2BGahUcQ-7wlLw77G0xfi7t5X4b6-hTstlPS-0ZrrkWa97gm__g3bSU3P7WM8mUkEoZbKo7qJa_1uJDvytxa8u-Z9D_7aP_p4_mXx-3LsPWuwd9LKDN3x7nto42hWLzGOsD40rhGmVjrw4s2Km3N6WR629GteRc4x-mxJjS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517457793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of bleached kraft mill process water using Microtox, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and Menidia beryllina toxicity tests</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Middaugh, D.P. (U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL.) ; Beckham, N ; Fournie, J.W ; Deardorff, T.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Middaugh, D.P. (U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL.) ; Beckham, N ; Fournie, J.W ; Deardorff, T.L</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether a 7- to 10-d embryo toxicity/teratogenicity test with the inland silverside fish, Menidia beryllina, is a sensitive indicator for evaluation of bleached kraft mill effluents, we compared this test with the Microtox(R) 15-min acute toxicity test and the Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-d chronic toxicity test. Water samples used in each test were collected from three areas in a bleached kraft pulp and paper mill using a 100% chlorine dioxide bleaching process: 1) river water prior to use in the mill; 2) the combined acid/base waste stream from the pulping process prior to biological treatment in the aerated stabilization basin (ASB); and 3) the effluent from the ASB with a retention time of approximately 11 d. Relative toxicity determined by the three tests for each water sampling location was compared. All three toxicity tests were predictive indicators of toxicity; however, the C. dubia and M. beryllina tests were the more similar and sensitive indicators of toxicity. Process water (ASB influent) prior to biological treatment in the ASB was toxic at all concentrations using the Microtox(R) and C. dubia tests. The fish embryo test showed no toxicity at 1% concentrations, slight toxicity at 10%, and acute toxicity at the 100% ASB influent concentration. Tests with biologically-treated ASB effluent indicated a substantial reduction in observed toxicity to Microtox(R) bacteria, C. dubia, and M. beryllina. No toxic responses were observed in any test at a 1% ASB effluent concentration which was the approximate effluent concentration in the receiving river following mixing. No relationship was found among any toxicological response and effluent levels of adsorbable organic halides, polychlorinated phenolic compounds, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran, total suspended solids, color, chemical oxygen demand, or total organic carbon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002449900198</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9175501</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AECTCV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Abnormalities, Drug-Induced ; Acute toxicity ; AGUAS RESIDUALES ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS ; Biological treatment ; Bleaching ; CALIDAD DEL AGUA ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Chlorine ; Chronic toxicity ; Daphnia - drug effects ; EAU USEE ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Effluents ; ELABORACION DE PULPA ; Embryo, Nonmammalian - drug effects ; EMBRYOS ; Fishes ; Fresh Water - chemistry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Halides ; INDICATOR ORGANISMS ; Industrial wastewater ; Kraft mills ; Organic carbon ; ORGANISME INDICATEUR ; ORGANISMOS INDICADORES ; Phenols ; Process water ; Pulp & paper mills ; Pulp wastes ; PULPING ; QUALITE DE L'EAU ; REDUCTION EN PATE ; Retention time ; Rivers ; Techniques ; Teratogenicity ; Total suspended solids ; TOXICIDAD ; TOXICITE ; TOXICITY ; Toxicity Tests ; Waste streams ; WASTEWATER ; Water analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity ; Water pollution ; WATER QUALITY ; Water sampling ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 1997-05, Vol.32 (4), p.367-375</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-2e79036df91978238185239f837b1f0400db3431f584f424553f419587fd132d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1517457793/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1517457793?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2773635$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9175501$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Middaugh, D.P. (U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckham, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournie, J.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deardorff, T.L</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of bleached kraft mill process water using Microtox, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and Menidia beryllina toxicity tests</title><title>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><description>To determine whether a 7- to 10-d embryo toxicity/teratogenicity test with the inland silverside fish, Menidia beryllina, is a sensitive indicator for evaluation of bleached kraft mill effluents, we compared this test with the Microtox(R) 15-min acute toxicity test and the Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-d chronic toxicity test. Water samples used in each test were collected from three areas in a bleached kraft pulp and paper mill using a 100% chlorine dioxide bleaching process: 1) river water prior to use in the mill; 2) the combined acid/base waste stream from the pulping process prior to biological treatment in the aerated stabilization basin (ASB); and 3) the effluent from the ASB with a retention time of approximately 11 d. Relative toxicity determined by the three tests for each water sampling location was compared. All three toxicity tests were predictive indicators of toxicity; however, the C. dubia and M. beryllina tests were the more similar and sensitive indicators of toxicity. Process water (ASB influent) prior to biological treatment in the ASB was toxic at all concentrations using the Microtox(R) and C. dubia tests. The fish embryo test showed no toxicity at 1% concentrations, slight toxicity at 10%, and acute toxicity at the 100% ASB influent concentration. Tests with biologically-treated ASB effluent indicated a substantial reduction in observed toxicity to Microtox(R) bacteria, C. dubia, and M. beryllina. No toxic responses were observed in any test at a 1% ASB effluent concentration which was the approximate effluent concentration in the receiving river following mixing. No relationship was found among any toxicological response and effluent levels of adsorbable organic halides, polychlorinated phenolic compounds, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran, total suspended solids, color, chemical oxygen demand, or total organic carbon.</description><subject>Abnormalities, Drug-Induced</subject><subject>Acute toxicity</subject><subject>AGUAS RESIDUALES</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS</subject><subject>Biological treatment</subject><subject>Bleaching</subject><subject>CALIDAD DEL AGUA</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Chronic toxicity</subject><subject>Daphnia - drug effects</subject><subject>EAU USEE</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>ELABORACION DE PULPA</subject><subject>Embryo, Nonmammalian - drug effects</subject><subject>EMBRYOS</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Fresh Water - chemistry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Halides</subject><subject>INDICATOR ORGANISMS</subject><subject>Industrial wastewater</subject><subject>Kraft mills</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>ORGANISME INDICATEUR</subject><subject>ORGANISMOS INDICADORES</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Process water</subject><subject>Pulp & paper mills</subject><subject>Pulp wastes</subject><subject>PULPING</subject><subject>QUALITE DE L'EAU</subject><subject>REDUCTION EN PATE</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Techniques</subject><subject>Teratogenicity</subject><subject>Total suspended solids</subject><subject>TOXICIDAD</subject><subject>TOXICITE</subject><subject>TOXICITY</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Waste streams</subject><subject>WASTEWATER</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>WATER QUALITY</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0090-4341</issn><issn>1432-0703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c9rFDEUB_AgSl2rRy-CEFA8dfQlL9kkx7LUH9DiQXseMpOkTc1m1mRGu_-9kV0KegrkfXjJly8hLxm8ZwDqQwXgQhgDwIx-RFZMIO9AAT4mKwADnUDBnpJntd41wrUWJ-TEMCUlsBW5v_hl02LnOGU6BTokb8db7-iPYsNMtzEluivT6Gulv-3sC11qzDf0Ko5lmqf7M7rxJU7O7m5ztNQtQ7Rn1GZHr3yOrl0NvuxTitnSxuMY5z2dfZ3rc_Ik2FT9i-N5Sq4_XnzffO4uv376sjm_7EY0cu64VwZw7YJhRmmOmmnJ0QSNamABBIAbUCALUosguJASg2BGahUcQ-7wlLw77G0xfi7t5X4b6-hTstlPS-0ZrrkWa97gm__g3bSU3P7WM8mUkEoZbKo7qJa_1uJDvytxa8u-Z9D_7aP_p4_mXx-3LsPWuwd9LKDN3x7nto42hWLzGOsD40rhGmVjrw4s2Km3N6WR629GteRc4x-mxJjS</recordid><startdate>19970501</startdate><enddate>19970501</enddate><creator>Middaugh, D.P. (U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL.)</creator><creator>Beckham, N</creator><creator>Fournie, J.W</creator><creator>Deardorff, T.L</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of bleached kraft mill process water using Microtox, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and Menidia beryllina toxicity tests</title><author>Middaugh, D.P. (U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL.) ; Beckham, N ; Fournie, J.W ; Deardorff, T.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-2e79036df91978238185239f837b1f0400db3431f584f424553f419587fd132d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities, Drug-Induced</topic><topic>Acute toxicity</topic><topic>AGUAS RESIDUALES</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS</topic><topic>Biological treatment</topic><topic>Bleaching</topic><topic>CALIDAD DEL AGUA</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Chronic toxicity</topic><topic>Daphnia - drug effects</topic><topic>EAU USEE</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>ELABORACION DE PULPA</topic><topic>Embryo, Nonmammalian - drug effects</topic><topic>EMBRYOS</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Fresh Water - chemistry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Halides</topic><topic>INDICATOR ORGANISMS</topic><topic>Industrial wastewater</topic><topic>Kraft mills</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>ORGANISME INDICATEUR</topic><topic>ORGANISMOS INDICADORES</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Process water</topic><topic>Pulp & paper mills</topic><topic>Pulp wastes</topic><topic>PULPING</topic><topic>QUALITE DE L'EAU</topic><topic>REDUCTION EN PATE</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Techniques</topic><topic>Teratogenicity</topic><topic>Total suspended solids</topic><topic>TOXICIDAD</topic><topic>TOXICITE</topic><topic>TOXICITY</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Waste streams</topic><topic>WASTEWATER</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>WATER QUALITY</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Middaugh, D.P. (U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL.)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckham, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournie, J.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deardorff, T.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><jtitle>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Middaugh, D.P. (U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL.)</au><au>Beckham, N</au><au>Fournie, J.W</au><au>Deardorff, T.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of bleached kraft mill process water using Microtox, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and Menidia beryllina toxicity tests</atitle><jtitle>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><date>1997-05-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>367-375</pages><issn>0090-4341</issn><eissn>1432-0703</eissn><coden>AECTCV</coden><abstract>To determine whether a 7- to 10-d embryo toxicity/teratogenicity test with the inland silverside fish, Menidia beryllina, is a sensitive indicator for evaluation of bleached kraft mill effluents, we compared this test with the Microtox(R) 15-min acute toxicity test and the Ceriodaphnia dubia 7-d chronic toxicity test. Water samples used in each test were collected from three areas in a bleached kraft pulp and paper mill using a 100% chlorine dioxide bleaching process: 1) river water prior to use in the mill; 2) the combined acid/base waste stream from the pulping process prior to biological treatment in the aerated stabilization basin (ASB); and 3) the effluent from the ASB with a retention time of approximately 11 d. Relative toxicity determined by the three tests for each water sampling location was compared. All three toxicity tests were predictive indicators of toxicity; however, the C. dubia and M. beryllina tests were the more similar and sensitive indicators of toxicity. Process water (ASB influent) prior to biological treatment in the ASB was toxic at all concentrations using the Microtox(R) and C. dubia tests. The fish embryo test showed no toxicity at 1% concentrations, slight toxicity at 10%, and acute toxicity at the 100% ASB influent concentration. Tests with biologically-treated ASB effluent indicated a substantial reduction in observed toxicity to Microtox(R) bacteria, C. dubia, and M. beryllina. No toxic responses were observed in any test at a 1% ASB effluent concentration which was the approximate effluent concentration in the receiving river following mixing. No relationship was found among any toxicological response and effluent levels of adsorbable organic halides, polychlorinated phenolic compounds, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran, total suspended solids, color, chemical oxygen demand, or total organic carbon.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>9175501</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002449900198</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4341 |
ispartof | Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 1997-05, Vol.32 (4), p.367-375 |
issn | 0090-4341 1432-0703 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13628462 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | Abnormalities, Drug-Induced Acute toxicity AGUAS RESIDUALES Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS Biological treatment Bleaching CALIDAD DEL AGUA Chemical oxygen demand Chlorine Chronic toxicity Daphnia - drug effects EAU USEE Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Effluents ELABORACION DE PULPA Embryo, Nonmammalian - drug effects EMBRYOS Fishes Fresh Water - chemistry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Halides INDICATOR ORGANISMS Industrial wastewater Kraft mills Organic carbon ORGANISME INDICATEUR ORGANISMOS INDICADORES Phenols Process water Pulp & paper mills Pulp wastes PULPING QUALITE DE L'EAU REDUCTION EN PATE Retention time Rivers Techniques Teratogenicity Total suspended solids TOXICIDAD TOXICITE TOXICITY Toxicity Tests Waste streams WASTEWATER Water analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity Water pollution WATER QUALITY Water sampling Water treatment |
title | Evaluation of bleached kraft mill process water using Microtox, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and Menidia beryllina toxicity tests |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20bleached%20kraft%20mill%20process%20water%20using%20Microtox,%20Ceriodaphnia%20dubia,%20and%20Menidia%20beryllina%20toxicity%20tests&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20environmental%20contamination%20and%20toxicology&rft.au=Middaugh,%20D.P.%20(U.S.%20EPA,%20Gulf%20Breeze,%20FL.)&rft.date=1997-05-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=367-375&rft.issn=0090-4341&rft.eissn=1432-0703&rft.coden=AECTCV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002449900198&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3278914631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-2e79036df91978238185239f837b1f0400db3431f584f424553f419587fd132d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517457793&rft_id=info:pmid/9175501&rfr_iscdi=true |