From Radical to Mainstream?: How Followercentric Approaches Inform Leadership

While the prevalent approach in leadership studies has focused on the leader figure, a growing number of studies challenge the implicit assumption that leaders are always singularly most central and critical to the leadership process. In this article, we review the development of follower-centered a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2012, Vol.220 (4), p.205-209
Main Authors: Bligh, Michelle C, Kohles, Jeffrey C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Experimentation
Followership
Group Dynamics
Human
Leadership
Leadership Style
Methodology
Superior Subordinate Relationship
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While the prevalent approach in leadership studies has focused on the leader figure, a growing number of studies challenge the implicit assumption that leaders are always singularly most central and critical to the leadership process. In this article, we review the development of follower-centered approaches that challenge the study of leadership without a concomitant emphasis on the importance of followership. From its roots as a critical challenge to the "mainstream" leadership tradition, the study of followership has helped to sharpen the focus of both leader and follower roles. Follower-centered approaches deepen almost any leader-centric analysis, for when the view is shifted from leaders to followers, assumptions are challenged, new perspectives are developed, and new questions are raised. Here, we provide an overview of followercentric approaches which either directly or indirectly challenge the study of leadership as primarily the study of leaders.
ISSN:2190-8370
2151-2604
DOI:10.1027/2151-2604/a000122