GOAL-DRIVEN AUTONOMY FOR RESPONDING TO UNEXPECTED EVENTS IN STRATEGY SIMULATIONS

To operate autonomously in complex environments, an agent must monitor its environment and determine how to respond to new situations. To be considered intelligent, an agent should select actions in pursuit of its goals, and adapt accordingly when its goals need revision. However, most agents assume...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computational intelligence 2013-05, Vol.29 (2), p.187-206
Main Authors: Klenk, Matthew, Molineaux, Matt, Aha, David W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Autonomous
autonomous agents
Autonomy
Computer simulation
Goal programming
goal reasoning
goal-driven autonomy
Intelligence
Intelligent agents
Intelligent systems
Monitors
on-line planning
Reasoning
Simulation
Strategy
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To operate autonomously in complex environments, an agent must monitor its environment and determine how to respond to new situations. To be considered intelligent, an agent should select actions in pursuit of its goals, and adapt accordingly when its goals need revision. However, most agents assume that their goals are given to them; they cannot recognize when their goals should change. Thus, they have difficulty coping with the complex environments of strategy simulations that are continuous, partially observable, dynamic, and open with respect to new objects. To increase intelligent agent autonomy, we are investigating a conceptual model for goal reasoning called Goal‐Driven Autonomy (GDA), which allows agents to generate and reason about their goals in response to environment changes. Our hypothesis is that GDA enables an agent to respond more effectively to unexpected events in complex environments. We instantiate the GDA model in ARTUE (Autonomous Response to Unexpected Events), a domain‐independent autonomous agent. We evaluate ARTUE on scenarios from two complex strategy simulations, and report on its comparative benefits and limitations. By employing goal reasoning, ARTUE outperforms an off‐line planner and a discrepancy‐based replanner on scenarios requiring reasoning about unobserved objects and facts and on scenarios presenting opportunities outside the scope of its current mission.
ISSN:0824-7935
1467-8640
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00445.x