Loading…
Gender, writing and ranking in review forums: a case study of the IMDb
Online review forums provide consumers with essential information about goods and services by facilitating word-of-mouth communication. Despite that preferences are correlated to demographic characteristics, reviewer gender is not often provided on user profiles. We consider the case of the internet...
Saved in:
Published in: | Knowledge and information systems 2013-06, Vol.35 (3), p.645-664 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8c57be78a6c2d54dc697b8c330a3bc1018138f9872944932a366fb0178c803df3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8c57be78a6c2d54dc697b8c330a3bc1018138f9872944932a366fb0178c803df3 |
container_end_page | 664 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 645 |
container_title | Knowledge and information systems |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Otterbacher, Jahna |
description | Online review forums provide consumers with essential information about goods and services by facilitating word-of-mouth communication. Despite that preferences are correlated to demographic characteristics, reviewer gender is not often provided on user profiles. We consider the case of the internet movie database (IMDb), where users exchange views on movies. Like many forums, IMDb employs collaborative filtering such that by default, reviews are ranked by perceived utility. IMDb also provides a unique gender filter that displays an equal number of reviews authored by men and women. Using logistic classification, we compare reviews with respect to writing style, content and metadata features. We find salient differences in stylistic features and content between reviews written by men and women, as predicted by sociolinguistic theory. However, utility is the best predictor of gender, with women’s reviews perceived as being much less useful than those written by men. While we cannot observe who votes at IMDb, we do find that highly rated female-authored reviews exhibit “male” characteristics. Our results have implications for which contributions are likely to be seen, and to what extent participants get a balanced view as to “what others think” about an item. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10115-012-0548-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365160810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1365160810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8c57be78a6c2d54dc697b8c330a3bc1018138f9872944932a366fb0178c803df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFKwzAUhosoOKcP4F1ABC-s5iRtk3on083BxBu9DmmazM4unUnr2J7ejA4RwascyHd-_vNF0TngG8CY3XrAAGmMgcQ4TXi8PYgGmEAeU4DscD8DZew4OvF-gTGwDGAQjSfaltpdo7Wr2srOkbQlctJ-7ObKIqe_Kr1GpnHd0t8hiZT0Gvm2KzeoMah912j6_FCcRkdG1l6f7d9h9DZ-fB09xbOXyXR0P4sVZXkbc5WyQjMuM0XKNClVlrOCK0qxpIUKJ3Cg3OSckTxJckokzTJThK5ccUxLQ4fRVZ-7cs1np30rlpVXuq6l1U3nBdAshQxzwAG9-IMums7Z0C5QCU9ZSnkeKOgp5RrvnTZi5aqldBsBWOzMit6sCGbFzqzYhp3LfbL0StYm6FKV_1kkjBJCIQkc6Tkfvuxcu18N_g3_BtGchZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1348575389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender, writing and ranking in review forums: a case study of the IMDb</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Otterbacher, Jahna</creator><creatorcontrib>Otterbacher, Jahna</creatorcontrib><description>Online review forums provide consumers with essential information about goods and services by facilitating word-of-mouth communication. Despite that preferences are correlated to demographic characteristics, reviewer gender is not often provided on user profiles. We consider the case of the internet movie database (IMDb), where users exchange views on movies. Like many forums, IMDb employs collaborative filtering such that by default, reviews are ranked by perceived utility. IMDb also provides a unique gender filter that displays an equal number of reviews authored by men and women. Using logistic classification, we compare reviews with respect to writing style, content and metadata features. We find salient differences in stylistic features and content between reviews written by men and women, as predicted by sociolinguistic theory. However, utility is the best predictor of gender, with women’s reviews perceived as being much less useful than those written by men. While we cannot observe who votes at IMDb, we do find that highly rated female-authored reviews exhibit “male” characteristics. Our results have implications for which contributions are likely to be seen, and to what extent participants get a balanced view as to “what others think” about an item.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0219-1377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0219-3116</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10115-012-0548-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: KISNCR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Applied sciences ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case studies ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Computer Science ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface ; Consumers ; Correlation ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Data processing. List processing. Character string processing ; Database Management ; Demographics ; Displays ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filtering ; Filtration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information systems ; Information Systems and Communication Service ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; Information systems. Data bases ; Internet ; IT in Business ; Memory organisation. Data processing ; Men ; Motion pictures ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Regular Paper ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social networks ; Social psychology ; Software ; Studies ; Utilities ; Virtual communities ; Women ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Knowledge and information systems, 2013-06, Vol.35 (3), p.645-664</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8c57be78a6c2d54dc697b8c330a3bc1018138f9872944932a366fb0178c803df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8c57be78a6c2d54dc697b8c330a3bc1018138f9872944932a366fb0178c803df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1348575389/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1348575389?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,36038,44339,74638</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27322314$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Otterbacher, Jahna</creatorcontrib><title>Gender, writing and ranking in review forums: a case study of the IMDb</title><title>Knowledge and information systems</title><addtitle>Knowl Inf Syst</addtitle><description>Online review forums provide consumers with essential information about goods and services by facilitating word-of-mouth communication. Despite that preferences are correlated to demographic characteristics, reviewer gender is not often provided on user profiles. We consider the case of the internet movie database (IMDb), where users exchange views on movies. Like many forums, IMDb employs collaborative filtering such that by default, reviews are ranked by perceived utility. IMDb also provides a unique gender filter that displays an equal number of reviews authored by men and women. Using logistic classification, we compare reviews with respect to writing style, content and metadata features. We find salient differences in stylistic features and content between reviews written by men and women, as predicted by sociolinguistic theory. However, utility is the best predictor of gender, with women’s reviews perceived as being much less useful than those written by men. While we cannot observe who votes at IMDb, we do find that highly rated female-authored reviews exhibit “male” characteristics. Our results have implications for which contributions are likely to be seen, and to what extent participants get a balanced view as to “what others think” about an item.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Data processing. List processing. Character string processing</subject><subject>Database Management</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Displays</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filtering</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Information Systems and Communication Service</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>Information systems. Data bases</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Memory organisation. Data processing</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Motion pictures</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Regular Paper</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><subject>Virtual communities</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0219-1377</issn><issn>0219-3116</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFKwzAUhosoOKcP4F1ABC-s5iRtk3on083BxBu9DmmazM4unUnr2J7ejA4RwascyHd-_vNF0TngG8CY3XrAAGmMgcQ4TXi8PYgGmEAeU4DscD8DZew4OvF-gTGwDGAQjSfaltpdo7Wr2srOkbQlctJ-7ObKIqe_Kr1GpnHd0t8hiZT0Gvm2KzeoMah912j6_FCcRkdG1l6f7d9h9DZ-fB09xbOXyXR0P4sVZXkbc5WyQjMuM0XKNClVlrOCK0qxpIUKJ3Cg3OSckTxJckokzTJThK5ccUxLQ4fRVZ-7cs1np30rlpVXuq6l1U3nBdAshQxzwAG9-IMums7Z0C5QCU9ZSnkeKOgp5RrvnTZi5aqldBsBWOzMit6sCGbFzqzYhp3LfbL0StYm6FKV_1kkjBJCIQkc6Tkfvuxcu18N_g3_BtGchZg</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Otterbacher, Jahna</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Gender, writing and ranking in review forums: a case study of the IMDb</title><author>Otterbacher, Jahna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8c57be78a6c2d54dc697b8c330a3bc1018138f9872944932a366fb0178c803df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Data processing. List processing. Character string processing</topic><topic>Database Management</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Displays</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filtering</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Information Systems and Communication Service</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>Information systems. Data bases</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Memory organisation. Data processing</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Motion pictures</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Regular Paper</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><topic>Virtual communities</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Otterbacher, Jahna</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Knowledge and information systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Otterbacher, Jahna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender, writing and ranking in review forums: a case study of the IMDb</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge and information systems</jtitle><stitle>Knowl Inf Syst</stitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>645-664</pages><issn>0219-1377</issn><eissn>0219-3116</eissn><coden>KISNCR</coden><abstract>Online review forums provide consumers with essential information about goods and services by facilitating word-of-mouth communication. Despite that preferences are correlated to demographic characteristics, reviewer gender is not often provided on user profiles. We consider the case of the internet movie database (IMDb), where users exchange views on movies. Like many forums, IMDb employs collaborative filtering such that by default, reviews are ranked by perceived utility. IMDb also provides a unique gender filter that displays an equal number of reviews authored by men and women. Using logistic classification, we compare reviews with respect to writing style, content and metadata features. We find salient differences in stylistic features and content between reviews written by men and women, as predicted by sociolinguistic theory. However, utility is the best predictor of gender, with women’s reviews perceived as being much less useful than those written by men. While we cannot observe who votes at IMDb, we do find that highly rated female-authored reviews exhibit “male” characteristics. Our results have implications for which contributions are likely to be seen, and to what extent participants get a balanced view as to “what others think” about an item.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10115-012-0548-z</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0219-1377 |
ispartof | Knowledge and information systems, 2013-06, Vol.35 (3), p.645-664 |
issn | 0219-1377 0219-3116 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365160810 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Springer Link |
subjects | Analysis Applied sciences Bias Biological and medical sciences Case studies Collaboration Communication Computer Science Computer science control theory systems Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface Consumers Correlation Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Data processing. List processing. Character string processing Database Management Demographics Displays Exact sciences and technology Filtering Filtration Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gender Gender differences Information Storage and Retrieval Information systems Information Systems and Communication Service Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) Information systems. Data bases Internet IT in Business Memory organisation. Data processing Men Motion pictures Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Regular Paper Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social networks Social psychology Software Studies Utilities Virtual communities Women Writing |
title | Gender, writing and ranking in review forums: a case study of the IMDb |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A01%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender,%20writing%20and%20ranking%20in%20review%20forums:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20the%20IMDb&rft.jtitle=Knowledge%20and%20information%20systems&rft.au=Otterbacher,%20Jahna&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=645-664&rft.issn=0219-1377&rft.eissn=0219-3116&rft.coden=KISNCR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10115-012-0548-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1365160810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-8c57be78a6c2d54dc697b8c330a3bc1018138f9872944932a366fb0178c803df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1348575389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |