Loading…

Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology

In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3); 2002 : 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta biotheoretica 2013-06, Vol.61 (2), p.223-258
Main Author: Mattiussi, Claudio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33
container_end_page 258
container_issue 2
container_start_page 223
container_title Acta biotheoretica
container_volume 61
creator Mattiussi, Claudio
description In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3); 2002 : 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiration from the approach used by engineers to design, understand, and troubleshoot technological systems. In the present paper I substantiate Lazebnik’s analysis by concretely showing how to apply the engineering approach to biological problems. I use an actual example of electronic circuit troubleshooting to ground the thesis that, in engineering, the crucial phases of any non-trivial troubleshooting process are aimed at generating a mechanistic explanation of the functioning of the system, which makes extensive recourse to problem-driven qualitative reasoning possibly based on cognitive artifacts applied to systems that are known to have been designed for function . To show how to translate these findings into biological practice I consider a concrete example of biological model building and “troubleshooting”, aimed at the identification of a “fix” for the human immune system in presence of progressing cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplant rejection. The result is a novel immune system model—the danger model with regulatory cells— and new, original hypotheses concerning the development, prophylaxis, and therapy of these unwanted biological processes. Based on the manifest efficacy of the proposed approach, I suggest a refocusing of the activity of theoretical biologists along the engineering-inspired lines illustrated in the paper.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10441-013-9180-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365508232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1365508232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AQxxdRbK0-gBcJePES3e9sTiKlVaEgaO9LPiZtarKpuwm0N9_BN_RJ3NAqIggDw7C_-c_yQ-ic4GuCcXTjCOachJiwMCYKh5sDNCQioqFiQh2iIcaYhIJxOkAnzq38GMsIH6MBZVxIgaMhmo4TE_iamEVpAGwwLTf9_FjXnYHgZetaqG8_3z-eoV2W5rU0i6BdQmOhLbOkCtKyqZrF9hQdFUnl4GzfR2g-nczHD-Hs6f5xfDcLM0Z5G9KcSqpApBjivMBSCkqlUgRIJmMZgxIUMp4UKhcpTWkR5TkmNIaUZzzLGRuhq13s2jZvHbhW16XLoKoSA03nNGFSCKwoox69_IOums4a_7me4lJxwrinyI7KbOOchUKvbVkndqsJ1r1jvXOsvWPdO9Ybv3OxT-7SGvKfjW-pHqA7wPknswD76_S_qV-y_4bH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1364684134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Mattiussi, Claudio</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattiussi, Claudio</creatorcontrib><description>In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3); 2002 : 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiration from the approach used by engineers to design, understand, and troubleshoot technological systems. In the present paper I substantiate Lazebnik’s analysis by concretely showing how to apply the engineering approach to biological problems. I use an actual example of electronic circuit troubleshooting to ground the thesis that, in engineering, the crucial phases of any non-trivial troubleshooting process are aimed at generating a mechanistic explanation of the functioning of the system, which makes extensive recourse to problem-driven qualitative reasoning possibly based on cognitive artifacts applied to systems that are known to have been designed for function . To show how to translate these findings into biological practice I consider a concrete example of biological model building and “troubleshooting”, aimed at the identification of a “fix” for the human immune system in presence of progressing cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplant rejection. The result is a novel immune system model—the danger model with regulatory cells— and new, original hypotheses concerning the development, prophylaxis, and therapy of these unwanted biological processes. Based on the manifest efficacy of the proposed approach, I suggest a refocusing of the activity of theoretical biologists along the engineering-inspired lines illustrated in the paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5342</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10441-013-9180-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23456507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Evolutionary Biology ; Humans ; Immune System ; Models, Biological ; Neoplasms - immunology ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Biology ; Regular Article</subject><ispartof>Acta biotheoretica, 2013-06, Vol.61 (2), p.223-258</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23456507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattiussi, Claudio</creatorcontrib><title>Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology</title><title>Acta biotheoretica</title><addtitle>Acta Biotheor</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Biotheor</addtitle><description>In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3); 2002 : 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiration from the approach used by engineers to design, understand, and troubleshoot technological systems. In the present paper I substantiate Lazebnik’s analysis by concretely showing how to apply the engineering approach to biological problems. I use an actual example of electronic circuit troubleshooting to ground the thesis that, in engineering, the crucial phases of any non-trivial troubleshooting process are aimed at generating a mechanistic explanation of the functioning of the system, which makes extensive recourse to problem-driven qualitative reasoning possibly based on cognitive artifacts applied to systems that are known to have been designed for function . To show how to translate these findings into biological practice I consider a concrete example of biological model building and “troubleshooting”, aimed at the identification of a “fix” for the human immune system in presence of progressing cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplant rejection. The result is a novel immune system model—the danger model with regulatory cells— and new, original hypotheses concerning the development, prophylaxis, and therapy of these unwanted biological processes. Based on the manifest efficacy of the proposed approach, I suggest a refocusing of the activity of theoretical biologists along the engineering-inspired lines illustrated in the paper.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune System</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Biology</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><issn>0001-5342</issn><issn>1572-8358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AQxxdRbK0-gBcJePES3e9sTiKlVaEgaO9LPiZtarKpuwm0N9_BN_RJ3NAqIggDw7C_-c_yQ-ic4GuCcXTjCOachJiwMCYKh5sDNCQioqFiQh2iIcaYhIJxOkAnzq38GMsIH6MBZVxIgaMhmo4TE_iamEVpAGwwLTf9_FjXnYHgZetaqG8_3z-eoV2W5rU0i6BdQmOhLbOkCtKyqZrF9hQdFUnl4GzfR2g-nczHD-Hs6f5xfDcLM0Z5G9KcSqpApBjivMBSCkqlUgRIJmMZgxIUMp4UKhcpTWkR5TkmNIaUZzzLGRuhq13s2jZvHbhW16XLoKoSA03nNGFSCKwoox69_IOums4a_7me4lJxwrinyI7KbOOchUKvbVkndqsJ1r1jvXOsvWPdO9Ybv3OxT-7SGvKfjW-pHqA7wPknswD76_S_qV-y_4bH</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Mattiussi, Claudio</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology</title><author>Mattiussi, Claudio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune System</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Biology</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattiussi, Claudio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta biotheoretica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattiussi, Claudio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology</atitle><jtitle>Acta biotheoretica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Biotheor</stitle><addtitle>Acta Biotheor</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>223-258</pages><issn>0001-5342</issn><eissn>1572-8358</eissn><abstract>In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3); 2002 : 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiration from the approach used by engineers to design, understand, and troubleshoot technological systems. In the present paper I substantiate Lazebnik’s analysis by concretely showing how to apply the engineering approach to biological problems. I use an actual example of electronic circuit troubleshooting to ground the thesis that, in engineering, the crucial phases of any non-trivial troubleshooting process are aimed at generating a mechanistic explanation of the functioning of the system, which makes extensive recourse to problem-driven qualitative reasoning possibly based on cognitive artifacts applied to systems that are known to have been designed for function . To show how to translate these findings into biological practice I consider a concrete example of biological model building and “troubleshooting”, aimed at the identification of a “fix” for the human immune system in presence of progressing cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplant rejection. The result is a novel immune system model—the danger model with regulatory cells— and new, original hypotheses concerning the development, prophylaxis, and therapy of these unwanted biological processes. Based on the manifest efficacy of the proposed approach, I suggest a refocusing of the activity of theoretical biologists along the engineering-inspired lines illustrated in the paper.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>23456507</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10441-013-9180-x</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5342
ispartof Acta biotheoretica, 2013-06, Vol.61 (2), p.223-258
issn 0001-5342
1572-8358
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365508232
source Springer Nature
subjects Education
Evolutionary Biology
Humans
Immune System
Models, Biological
Neoplasms - immunology
Philosophy
Philosophy of Biology
Regular Article
title Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20an%20Engineer%20Fix%20an%20Immune%20System?%E2%80%93Rethinking%20theoretical%20biology&rft.jtitle=Acta%20biotheoretica&rft.au=Mattiussi,%20Claudio&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=223-258&rft.issn=0001-5342&rft.eissn=1572-8358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10441-013-9180-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1365508232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1364684134&rft_id=info:pmid/23456507&rfr_iscdi=true