Loading…
Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology
In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3); 2002 : 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiratio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta biotheoretica 2013-06, Vol.61 (2), p.223-258 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33 |
container_end_page | 258 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Acta biotheoretica |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Mattiussi, Claudio |
description | In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3);
2002
: 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiration from the approach used by engineers to design, understand, and troubleshoot technological systems. In the present paper I substantiate Lazebnik’s analysis by concretely showing
how
to apply the engineering approach to biological problems. I use an actual example of electronic circuit troubleshooting to ground the thesis that, in engineering, the crucial phases of any non-trivial troubleshooting process are aimed at generating a
mechanistic explanation
of the functioning of the system, which makes extensive recourse to
problem-driven qualitative reasoning
possibly based on
cognitive artifacts
applied to systems that are known to have been
designed for function
. To show how to translate these findings into biological practice I consider a concrete example of biological model building and “troubleshooting”, aimed at the identification of a “fix” for the human immune system in presence of progressing cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplant rejection. The result is a novel immune system model—the
danger model with regulatory cells—
and new, original hypotheses concerning the development, prophylaxis, and therapy of these unwanted biological processes. Based on the manifest efficacy of the proposed approach, I suggest a refocusing of the activity of theoretical biologists along the engineering-inspired lines illustrated in the paper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10441-013-9180-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365508232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1365508232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AQxxdRbK0-gBcJePES3e9sTiKlVaEgaO9LPiZtarKpuwm0N9_BN_RJ3NAqIggDw7C_-c_yQ-ic4GuCcXTjCOachJiwMCYKh5sDNCQioqFiQh2iIcaYhIJxOkAnzq38GMsIH6MBZVxIgaMhmo4TE_iamEVpAGwwLTf9_FjXnYHgZetaqG8_3z-eoV2W5rU0i6BdQmOhLbOkCtKyqZrF9hQdFUnl4GzfR2g-nczHD-Hs6f5xfDcLM0Z5G9KcSqpApBjivMBSCkqlUgRIJmMZgxIUMp4UKhcpTWkR5TkmNIaUZzzLGRuhq13s2jZvHbhW16XLoKoSA03nNGFSCKwoox69_IOums4a_7me4lJxwrinyI7KbOOchUKvbVkndqsJ1r1jvXOsvWPdO9Ybv3OxT-7SGvKfjW-pHqA7wPknswD76_S_qV-y_4bH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1364684134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Mattiussi, Claudio</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattiussi, Claudio</creatorcontrib><description>In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3);
2002
: 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiration from the approach used by engineers to design, understand, and troubleshoot technological systems. In the present paper I substantiate Lazebnik’s analysis by concretely showing
how
to apply the engineering approach to biological problems. I use an actual example of electronic circuit troubleshooting to ground the thesis that, in engineering, the crucial phases of any non-trivial troubleshooting process are aimed at generating a
mechanistic explanation
of the functioning of the system, which makes extensive recourse to
problem-driven qualitative reasoning
possibly based on
cognitive artifacts
applied to systems that are known to have been
designed for function
. To show how to translate these findings into biological practice I consider a concrete example of biological model building and “troubleshooting”, aimed at the identification of a “fix” for the human immune system in presence of progressing cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplant rejection. The result is a novel immune system model—the
danger model with regulatory cells—
and new, original hypotheses concerning the development, prophylaxis, and therapy of these unwanted biological processes. Based on the manifest efficacy of the proposed approach, I suggest a refocusing of the activity of theoretical biologists along the engineering-inspired lines illustrated in the paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5342</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10441-013-9180-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23456507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Evolutionary Biology ; Humans ; Immune System ; Models, Biological ; Neoplasms - immunology ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Biology ; Regular Article</subject><ispartof>Acta biotheoretica, 2013-06, Vol.61 (2), p.223-258</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23456507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattiussi, Claudio</creatorcontrib><title>Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology</title><title>Acta biotheoretica</title><addtitle>Acta Biotheor</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Biotheor</addtitle><description>In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3);
2002
: 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiration from the approach used by engineers to design, understand, and troubleshoot technological systems. In the present paper I substantiate Lazebnik’s analysis by concretely showing
how
to apply the engineering approach to biological problems. I use an actual example of electronic circuit troubleshooting to ground the thesis that, in engineering, the crucial phases of any non-trivial troubleshooting process are aimed at generating a
mechanistic explanation
of the functioning of the system, which makes extensive recourse to
problem-driven qualitative reasoning
possibly based on
cognitive artifacts
applied to systems that are known to have been
designed for function
. To show how to translate these findings into biological practice I consider a concrete example of biological model building and “troubleshooting”, aimed at the identification of a “fix” for the human immune system in presence of progressing cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplant rejection. The result is a novel immune system model—the
danger model with regulatory cells—
and new, original hypotheses concerning the development, prophylaxis, and therapy of these unwanted biological processes. Based on the manifest efficacy of the proposed approach, I suggest a refocusing of the activity of theoretical biologists along the engineering-inspired lines illustrated in the paper.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune System</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Biology</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><issn>0001-5342</issn><issn>1572-8358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AQxxdRbK0-gBcJePES3e9sTiKlVaEgaO9LPiZtarKpuwm0N9_BN_RJ3NAqIggDw7C_-c_yQ-ic4GuCcXTjCOachJiwMCYKh5sDNCQioqFiQh2iIcaYhIJxOkAnzq38GMsIH6MBZVxIgaMhmo4TE_iamEVpAGwwLTf9_FjXnYHgZetaqG8_3z-eoV2W5rU0i6BdQmOhLbOkCtKyqZrF9hQdFUnl4GzfR2g-nczHD-Hs6f5xfDcLM0Z5G9KcSqpApBjivMBSCkqlUgRIJmMZgxIUMp4UKhcpTWkR5TkmNIaUZzzLGRuhq13s2jZvHbhW16XLoKoSA03nNGFSCKwoox69_IOums4a_7me4lJxwrinyI7KbOOchUKvbVkndqsJ1r1jvXOsvWPdO9Ybv3OxT-7SGvKfjW-pHqA7wPknswD76_S_qV-y_4bH</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Mattiussi, Claudio</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology</title><author>Mattiussi, Claudio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune System</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Biology</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattiussi, Claudio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta biotheoretica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattiussi, Claudio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology</atitle><jtitle>Acta biotheoretica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Biotheor</stitle><addtitle>Acta Biotheor</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>223-258</pages><issn>0001-5342</issn><eissn>1572-8358</eissn><abstract>In an instant classic paper (Lazebnik, in Cancer Cell 2(3);
2002
: 179–182) biologist Yuri Lazebnik deplores the poor effectiveness of the approach adopted by biologists to understand and “fix” biological systems. Lazebnik suggests that to remedy this state of things biologist should take inspiration from the approach used by engineers to design, understand, and troubleshoot technological systems. In the present paper I substantiate Lazebnik’s analysis by concretely showing
how
to apply the engineering approach to biological problems. I use an actual example of electronic circuit troubleshooting to ground the thesis that, in engineering, the crucial phases of any non-trivial troubleshooting process are aimed at generating a
mechanistic explanation
of the functioning of the system, which makes extensive recourse to
problem-driven qualitative reasoning
possibly based on
cognitive artifacts
applied to systems that are known to have been
designed for function
. To show how to translate these findings into biological practice I consider a concrete example of biological model building and “troubleshooting”, aimed at the identification of a “fix” for the human immune system in presence of progressing cancer, autoimmune disease, and transplant rejection. The result is a novel immune system model—the
danger model with regulatory cells—
and new, original hypotheses concerning the development, prophylaxis, and therapy of these unwanted biological processes. Based on the manifest efficacy of the proposed approach, I suggest a refocusing of the activity of theoretical biologists along the engineering-inspired lines illustrated in the paper.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>23456507</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10441-013-9180-x</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-5342 |
ispartof | Acta biotheoretica, 2013-06, Vol.61 (2), p.223-258 |
issn | 0001-5342 1572-8358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1365508232 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Education Evolutionary Biology Humans Immune System Models, Biological Neoplasms - immunology Philosophy Philosophy of Biology Regular Article |
title | Can an Engineer Fix an Immune System?–Rethinking theoretical biology |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20an%20Engineer%20Fix%20an%20Immune%20System?%E2%80%93Rethinking%20theoretical%20biology&rft.jtitle=Acta%20biotheoretica&rft.au=Mattiussi,%20Claudio&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=223-258&rft.issn=0001-5342&rft.eissn=1572-8358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10441-013-9180-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1365508232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-2d2628e5b0e9df0665226881e1c6969e852ec4af8d5b2b2f7dd0129eb4c4cd33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1364684134&rft_id=info:pmid/23456507&rfr_iscdi=true |