Loading…
Comparison of Prognostic Genomic Predictors in Colorectal Cancer. e60778
Background Although several prognostic genomic predictors have been identified from independent studies, it remains unclear whether these predictors are actually concordant with respect to their predictions for individual patients and which predictor performs best. We compared five prognostic genomi...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2013-04, Vol.8 (4) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Park, Yun-Yong Lee, Sung Sook Lim, Jae Yun Kim, Sang Cheol Kim, Sang Bae Sohn, Bo Hwa Chu, In-Sun Oh, Sang Cheul Park, Eun Sung Jeong, Woojin |
description | Background Although several prognostic genomic predictors have been identified from independent studies, it remains unclear whether these predictors are actually concordant with respect to their predictions for individual patients and which predictor performs best. We compared five prognostic genomic predictors, the V7RHS, the ColoGuideEx, the Meta163, the OncoDX, and the MDA114, in terms of predicting disease-free survival in two independent cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer. Study Design Using original classification algorithms, we tested the predictions of five genomic predictors for disease-free survival in two cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer (n = 229 and n = 168) and evaluated concordance of predictors in predicting outcomes for individual patients. Results We found that only two predictors, OncoDX and MDA114, demonstrated robust performance in identifying patients with poor prognosis in 2 independent cohorts. These two predictors also had modest but significant concordance of predicted outcome (r>0.3, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0060778 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367493730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1367493730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13674937303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVzb0KwjAUQOEgCNafN3DI6GJNjCZ1LmrHDu4S4q2kpLk1t31_RXwBp285cBhbS5FLZeSuxTFFG_IeI-RCaGFMMWGZPKn9Vu-FmrE5USvEURVaZ6wqsett8oSRY8PrhM-INHjHrxCx-1gneHg3YCLuIy8xYAI32MBLGx2knMP3sWTTxgaC1c8F21zOt7La9glfI9Bw7zw5CMFGwJHuUmlzOCmjhPojfQPUykaD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1367493730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Prognostic Genomic Predictors in Colorectal Cancer. e60778</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Park, Yun-Yong ; Lee, Sung Sook ; Lim, Jae Yun ; Kim, Sang Cheol ; Kim, Sang Bae ; Sohn, Bo Hwa ; Chu, In-Sun ; Oh, Sang Cheul ; Park, Eun Sung ; Jeong, Woojin</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Yun-Yong ; Lee, Sung Sook ; Lim, Jae Yun ; Kim, Sang Cheol ; Kim, Sang Bae ; Sohn, Bo Hwa ; Chu, In-Sun ; Oh, Sang Cheul ; Park, Eun Sung ; Jeong, Woojin</creatorcontrib><description>Background Although several prognostic genomic predictors have been identified from independent studies, it remains unclear whether these predictors are actually concordant with respect to their predictions for individual patients and which predictor performs best. We compared five prognostic genomic predictors, the V7RHS, the ColoGuideEx, the Meta163, the OncoDX, and the MDA114, in terms of predicting disease-free survival in two independent cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer. Study Design Using original classification algorithms, we tested the predictions of five genomic predictors for disease-free survival in two cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer (n = 229 and n = 168) and evaluated concordance of predictors in predicting outcomes for individual patients. Results We found that only two predictors, OncoDX and MDA114, demonstrated robust performance in identifying patients with poor prognosis in 2 independent cohorts. These two predictors also had modest but significant concordance of predicted outcome (r>0.3, P<0.001 in both cohorts). Conclusions Further validation of developed genomic predictors is necessary. Despite the limited number of genes shared by OncoDX and MDA114, individual-patient outcomes predicted by these two predictors were significantly concordant.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060778</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-04, Vol.8 (4)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,37013</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Yun-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung Sook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jae Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Bo Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, In-Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Sang Cheul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Eun Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Woojin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Prognostic Genomic Predictors in Colorectal Cancer. e60778</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Background Although several prognostic genomic predictors have been identified from independent studies, it remains unclear whether these predictors are actually concordant with respect to their predictions for individual patients and which predictor performs best. We compared five prognostic genomic predictors, the V7RHS, the ColoGuideEx, the Meta163, the OncoDX, and the MDA114, in terms of predicting disease-free survival in two independent cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer. Study Design Using original classification algorithms, we tested the predictions of five genomic predictors for disease-free survival in two cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer (n = 229 and n = 168) and evaluated concordance of predictors in predicting outcomes for individual patients. Results We found that only two predictors, OncoDX and MDA114, demonstrated robust performance in identifying patients with poor prognosis in 2 independent cohorts. These two predictors also had modest but significant concordance of predicted outcome (r>0.3, P<0.001 in both cohorts). Conclusions Further validation of developed genomic predictors is necessary. Despite the limited number of genes shared by OncoDX and MDA114, individual-patient outcomes predicted by these two predictors were significantly concordant.</description><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVzb0KwjAUQOEgCNafN3DI6GJNjCZ1LmrHDu4S4q2kpLk1t31_RXwBp285cBhbS5FLZeSuxTFFG_IeI-RCaGFMMWGZPKn9Vu-FmrE5USvEURVaZ6wqsett8oSRY8PrhM-INHjHrxCx-1gneHg3YCLuIy8xYAI32MBLGx2knMP3sWTTxgaC1c8F21zOt7La9glfI9Bw7zw5CMFGwJHuUmlzOCmjhPojfQPUykaD</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Park, Yun-Yong</creator><creator>Lee, Sung Sook</creator><creator>Lim, Jae Yun</creator><creator>Kim, Sang Cheol</creator><creator>Kim, Sang Bae</creator><creator>Sohn, Bo Hwa</creator><creator>Chu, In-Sun</creator><creator>Oh, Sang Cheul</creator><creator>Park, Eun Sung</creator><creator>Jeong, Woojin</creator><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Comparison of Prognostic Genomic Predictors in Colorectal Cancer. e60778</title><author>Park, Yun-Yong ; Lee, Sung Sook ; Lim, Jae Yun ; Kim, Sang Cheol ; Kim, Sang Bae ; Sohn, Bo Hwa ; Chu, In-Sun ; Oh, Sang Cheul ; Park, Eun Sung ; Jeong, Woojin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13674937303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Yun-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sung Sook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Jae Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohn, Bo Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, In-Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Sang Cheul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Eun Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Woojin</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Yun-Yong</au><au>Lee, Sung Sook</au><au>Lim, Jae Yun</au><au>Kim, Sang Cheol</au><au>Kim, Sang Bae</au><au>Sohn, Bo Hwa</au><au>Chu, In-Sun</au><au>Oh, Sang Cheul</au><au>Park, Eun Sung</au><au>Jeong, Woojin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Prognostic Genomic Predictors in Colorectal Cancer. e60778</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Background Although several prognostic genomic predictors have been identified from independent studies, it remains unclear whether these predictors are actually concordant with respect to their predictions for individual patients and which predictor performs best. We compared five prognostic genomic predictors, the V7RHS, the ColoGuideEx, the Meta163, the OncoDX, and the MDA114, in terms of predicting disease-free survival in two independent cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer. Study Design Using original classification algorithms, we tested the predictions of five genomic predictors for disease-free survival in two cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer (n = 229 and n = 168) and evaluated concordance of predictors in predicting outcomes for individual patients. Results We found that only two predictors, OncoDX and MDA114, demonstrated robust performance in identifying patients with poor prognosis in 2 independent cohorts. These two predictors also had modest but significant concordance of predicted outcome (r>0.3, P<0.001 in both cohorts). Conclusions Further validation of developed genomic predictors is necessary. Despite the limited number of genes shared by OncoDX and MDA114, individual-patient outcomes predicted by these two predictors were significantly concordant.</abstract><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0060778</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2013-04, Vol.8 (4) |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1367493730 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
title | Comparison of Prognostic Genomic Predictors in Colorectal Cancer. e60778 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A20%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Prognostic%20Genomic%20Predictors%20in%20Colorectal%20Cancer.%20e60778&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Park,%20Yun-Yong&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0060778&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1367493730%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13674937303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1367493730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |