We’re Working Hard, but Is It Hardly Working?: Why Process Is Critical in the Delivery of Worksite Health Promotion Programs

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relationship between the process and outcomes of worksite wellness committees (WWCs) implementing worksite health promotion programs at PPG Industries, Inc. METHODS:We developed two unique tools to understand how WWCs function and to assess their program implementation. We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2013-05, Vol.55 (5), p.586-592
Main Authors: Felter, Elizabeth M., Nolan, Beth A.D., Colombi, Alberto, Albert, Steven M., Pringle, Jan L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
Effectiveness studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Health Promotion - economics
Health Promotion - methods
Health Promotion - organization & administration
Humans
Medical sciences
Occupational Health
Organizational Culture
Original Article
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Program Evaluation
Wellness programs
Workplace
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relationship between the process and outcomes of worksite wellness committees (WWCs) implementing worksite health promotion programs at PPG Industries, Inc. METHODS:We developed two unique tools to understand how WWCs function and to assess their program implementation. We then analyzed survey data from 65 PPG worksites, measuring process and program implementation. RESULTS:Worksites that scored higher on the process indicator had more robust program implementation. CONCLUSIONS:The WWCs need increased attention from researchers and evaluators. Employers should consider administering worksite health promotion structural assessments to identify gaps in management support and program implementation that may influence program effectiveness.
ISSN:1076-2752
1536-5948
DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182882c17