Optical analysis of deviations in a concentrating photovoltaics central receiver system with a flux homogenizer

The application of a kaleidoscope as a flux homogenizer to a concentrating photovoltaics system with a central receiver is investigated. The optical setup of a primary dish-type concentrator, a secondary homogenizer optics, and a photovoltaic receiver is simulated using ray tracing. The influence of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied optics (2004) 2013-05, Vol.52 (13), p.2974-2984
Main Authors: Helmers, Henning, Thor, Wei Yi, Schmidt, Thomas, van Rooyen, De Wet, Bett, Andreas W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Deviation
Flux
Homogenizers
Photovoltaic cells
Receivers
Simulation
Solar cells
Tracking errors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The application of a kaleidoscope as a flux homogenizer to a concentrating photovoltaics system with a central receiver is investigated. The optical setup of a primary dish-type concentrator, a secondary homogenizer optics, and a photovoltaic receiver is simulated using ray tracing. The influence of various deviations from the ideal-namely sunshape (circumsolar radiation), shading, tracking error, and shape of the primary optical concentrator-on the performance of the homogenizer is analyzed quantitatively using the optical efficiency and the normalized standard deviation as a measure of inhomogeneity. Flux distributions for different progressively increasing deviations are discussed qualitatively. Experimental validation of the simulation is presented. It is demonstrated that the performance of the homogenizer is not particularly sensitive to sunshape. If sufficient length is provided, the homogenizer effectively compensates for tracking error, misalignment, and shape deviations of the primary concentrator. Yet despite the presence of the homogenizer, shading due to the holder of the receiver significantly affects the flux distribution at the receiver.
ISSN:1559-128X
2155-3165
DOI:10.1364/AO.52.002974