Loading…

Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions

The conceptual framework of constructing regional advantage (CRA) is implicitly relevant for large, well-off regions that have strong regional innovation systems, a diversity of industrial sectors and resourceful firms that can partake in global knowledge networks. This paper discusses the extent to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European urban and regional studies 2013-04, Vol.20 (2), p.243-257
Main Authors: Isaksen, Arne, Karlsen, James
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6952ac2c7aa3fdb0f8e56228c46930cd985da8b855643c05f68e3324726321433
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6952ac2c7aa3fdb0f8e56228c46930cd985da8b855643c05f68e3324726321433
container_end_page 257
container_issue 2
container_start_page 243
container_title European urban and regional studies
container_volume 20
creator Isaksen, Arne
Karlsen, James
description The conceptual framework of constructing regional advantage (CRA) is implicitly relevant for large, well-off regions that have strong regional innovation systems, a diversity of industrial sectors and resourceful firms that can partake in global knowledge networks. This paper discusses the extent to which small regions, with less developed regional innovation systems, may also constitute the basis for developing regional advantage. Four cases of regional industries dominated by different innovation modes make up the empirical test bed in the paper. The innovation modes are STI (science, technology, innovation), CCI (complex, combined innovation) and DUI (doing, using, interacting). With some reformulations, the CRA framework also is found to represent a useful conceptual construct for small regions. Adapting the CRA framework to small regions involves focusing more on increasing the innovation capabilities at the level of the firm – placing less emphasis on the endogenous capacity of regional innovation systems, but emphasising the importance of experience-based knowledge in local labour markets – and concentrating more on the need for a diversity of knowledge bases at the regional level. Policy lessons for constructing regional advantages in small regions should, in general, consider the upgrading of DUI firms and stimulating extra-regional links.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0969776412439200
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1373465965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0969776412439200</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2952140511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6952ac2c7aa3fdb0f8e56228c46930cd985da8b855643c05f68e3324726321433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWKt3jwEvXlYn38lJpPgFRQ_W85Jmk9qy3a3JruK_N0t7kILgZQIzzzyQdxA6J3BFiFLXYKRRSnJCOTMU4ACNCJekUISLQzQaxsUwP0YnKa0AQGplRuh1Yhuc1raucfSLZdsk7HLpYu-6XcfW2FaftunswqcbPHv32NnkcRtwaPuIn9v4lcHs2RlO0VGwdfJnu3eM3u7vZpPHYvry8DS5nRaOKdEV0ghqHXXKWhaqOQTthaRUOy4NA1cZLSqr51oIyZkDEaT2jFGuqGSUcMbG6HLr3cT2o_epK9fL5Hxd28a3fSoJU4xLYaT4BypAa53lGb3YQ1f5lzmFgWKSKA054jGCLeVim1L0odzE5drG75JAORyk3D9IXim2KykH-Uv6F_8DiaeIOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1336178024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Isaksen, Arne ; Karlsen, James</creator><contributor>Boschma, Ron ; Asheim, Björn ; Tödtling, Franz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Isaksen, Arne ; Karlsen, James ; Boschma, Ron ; Asheim, Björn ; Tödtling, Franz</creatorcontrib><description>The conceptual framework of constructing regional advantage (CRA) is implicitly relevant for large, well-off regions that have strong regional innovation systems, a diversity of industrial sectors and resourceful firms that can partake in global knowledge networks. This paper discusses the extent to which small regions, with less developed regional innovation systems, may also constitute the basis for developing regional advantage. Four cases of regional industries dominated by different innovation modes make up the empirical test bed in the paper. The innovation modes are STI (science, technology, innovation), CCI (complex, combined innovation) and DUI (doing, using, interacting). With some reformulations, the CRA framework also is found to represent a useful conceptual construct for small regions. Adapting the CRA framework to small regions involves focusing more on increasing the innovation capabilities at the level of the firm – placing less emphasis on the endogenous capacity of regional innovation systems, but emphasising the importance of experience-based knowledge in local labour markets – and concentrating more on the need for a diversity of knowledge bases at the regional level. Policy lessons for constructing regional advantages in small regions should, in general, consider the upgrading of DUI firms and stimulating extra-regional links.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0969776412439200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Comparative economics ; Competitive advantage ; Industry ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Knowledge ; Labor market ; Local government ; Markets ; Networks ; Norway ; Regional development ; Regions ; Science ; Technology</subject><ispartof>European urban and regional studies, 2013-04, Vol.20 (2), p.243-257</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Apr 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6952ac2c7aa3fdb0f8e56228c46930cd985da8b855643c05f68e3324726321433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6952ac2c7aa3fdb0f8e56228c46930cd985da8b855643c05f68e3324726321433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Boschma, Ron</contributor><contributor>Asheim, Björn</contributor><contributor>Tödtling, Franz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Isaksen, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsen, James</creatorcontrib><title>Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions</title><title>European urban and regional studies</title><description>The conceptual framework of constructing regional advantage (CRA) is implicitly relevant for large, well-off regions that have strong regional innovation systems, a diversity of industrial sectors and resourceful firms that can partake in global knowledge networks. This paper discusses the extent to which small regions, with less developed regional innovation systems, may also constitute the basis for developing regional advantage. Four cases of regional industries dominated by different innovation modes make up the empirical test bed in the paper. The innovation modes are STI (science, technology, innovation), CCI (complex, combined innovation) and DUI (doing, using, interacting). With some reformulations, the CRA framework also is found to represent a useful conceptual construct for small regions. Adapting the CRA framework to small regions involves focusing more on increasing the innovation capabilities at the level of the firm – placing less emphasis on the endogenous capacity of regional innovation systems, but emphasising the importance of experience-based knowledge in local labour markets – and concentrating more on the need for a diversity of knowledge bases at the regional level. Policy lessons for constructing regional advantages in small regions should, in general, consider the upgrading of DUI firms and stimulating extra-regional links.</description><subject>Comparative economics</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0969-7764</issn><issn>1461-7145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWKt3jwEvXlYn38lJpPgFRQ_W85Jmk9qy3a3JruK_N0t7kILgZQIzzzyQdxA6J3BFiFLXYKRRSnJCOTMU4ACNCJekUISLQzQaxsUwP0YnKa0AQGplRuh1Yhuc1raucfSLZdsk7HLpYu-6XcfW2FaftunswqcbPHv32NnkcRtwaPuIn9v4lcHs2RlO0VGwdfJnu3eM3u7vZpPHYvry8DS5nRaOKdEV0ghqHXXKWhaqOQTthaRUOy4NA1cZLSqr51oIyZkDEaT2jFGuqGSUcMbG6HLr3cT2o_epK9fL5Hxd28a3fSoJU4xLYaT4BypAa53lGb3YQ1f5lzmFgWKSKA054jGCLeVim1L0odzE5drG75JAORyk3D9IXim2KykH-Uv6F_8DiaeIOA</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Isaksen, Arne</creator><creator>Karlsen, James</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions</title><author>Isaksen, Arne ; Karlsen, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6952ac2c7aa3fdb0f8e56228c46930cd985da8b855643c05f68e3324726321433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Comparative economics</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isaksen, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsen, James</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European urban and regional studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isaksen, Arne</au><au>Karlsen, James</au><au>Boschma, Ron</au><au>Asheim, Björn</au><au>Tödtling, Franz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions</atitle><jtitle>European urban and regional studies</jtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>243-257</pages><issn>0969-7764</issn><eissn>1461-7145</eissn><abstract>The conceptual framework of constructing regional advantage (CRA) is implicitly relevant for large, well-off regions that have strong regional innovation systems, a diversity of industrial sectors and resourceful firms that can partake in global knowledge networks. This paper discusses the extent to which small regions, with less developed regional innovation systems, may also constitute the basis for developing regional advantage. Four cases of regional industries dominated by different innovation modes make up the empirical test bed in the paper. The innovation modes are STI (science, technology, innovation), CCI (complex, combined innovation) and DUI (doing, using, interacting). With some reformulations, the CRA framework also is found to represent a useful conceptual construct for small regions. Adapting the CRA framework to small regions involves focusing more on increasing the innovation capabilities at the level of the firm – placing less emphasis on the endogenous capacity of regional innovation systems, but emphasising the importance of experience-based knowledge in local labour markets – and concentrating more on the need for a diversity of knowledge bases at the regional level. Policy lessons for constructing regional advantages in small regions should, in general, consider the upgrading of DUI firms and stimulating extra-regional links.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0969776412439200</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-7764
ispartof European urban and regional studies, 2013-04, Vol.20 (2), p.243-257
issn 0969-7764
1461-7145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1373465965
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; SAGE
subjects Comparative economics
Competitive advantage
Industry
Innovation
Innovations
Knowledge
Labor market
Local government
Markets
Networks
Norway
Regional development
Regions
Science
Technology
title Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A11%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20small%20regions%20construct%20regional%20advantages?%20The%20case%20of%20four%20Norwegian%20regions&rft.jtitle=European%20urban%20and%20regional%20studies&rft.au=Isaksen,%20Arne&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=243-257&rft.issn=0969-7764&rft.eissn=1461-7145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0969776412439200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2952140511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6952ac2c7aa3fdb0f8e56228c46930cd985da8b855643c05f68e3324726321433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1336178024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0969776412439200&rfr_iscdi=true