Loading…

Interference Among Oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, Feeding on Mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe Estuary

(1) Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus eating mussels Mytilus edulis on the Exe Estuary were aggressive and often stole mussels from each other. A stable and linear dominance hierarchy existed amongst ten birds studied in detail. The intake rates (biomass consumed per 10 min foraging) of six out o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of animal ecology 1984-01, Vol.53 (1), p.217-231
Main Authors: Ens, B. J., Goss-Custard, J. D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-349666413a9bf5bc870217df9c70d43c4c5185a7f908f148fcd44facfc90c0173
cites
container_end_page 231
container_issue 1
container_start_page 217
container_title The Journal of animal ecology
container_volume 53
creator Ens, B. J.
Goss-Custard, J. D.
description (1) Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus eating mussels Mytilus edulis on the Exe Estuary were aggressive and often stole mussels from each other. A stable and linear dominance hierarchy existed amongst ten birds studied in detail. The intake rates (biomass consumed per 10 min foraging) of six out of eight birds on which adequate data were obtained, decreased with increasing densities of oystercatchers. However, this did not happen in the two top-dominant individuals, which therefore did not seem to suffer from interference. (2) Interference in the subdominants was due to increased intraspecific kleptoparasitism, to decreased capture rates probably caused by avoidance, and, perhaps, to increased time spent in aggression. Subdominants avoided high densities of conspecifics, but they did not stop feeding when high densities occurred. (3) It is possible to account for our data in terms of the increased opportunities for dominants to steal food from subdominants at high bird densities. Competition for small-scale feeding sites may have been important too. It is suggested that the dispersion of oystercatchers over the mussel bed can be described by a modification of the `ideal despotic distribution' proposed by Fretwell (1972).
doi_str_mv 10.2307/4353
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13889031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4353</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-349666413a9bf5bc870217df9c70d43c4c5185a7f908f148fcd44facfc90c0173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c9LHTEQB_AgCn1q_4cVS09dnWyy-XEU0SooXux5idlE97Fvs2ay0Pffd-SVCsWDhxAy-TAw82XsmMNZI0CfS9GKPbbiQrV1o1q1z1YADa-NtvCFHSKuAUA3IFZsvp1KyDHkMPlQXWzS9Fw9bJFq3hX_EjL-qG5c2LiS5gWrhCW7MTwvVL4OoR-Ip6m6XxDDSLX7bRlGcqFfxoHe9FdeQnX1mw6WxeXtMTuIbsTw9e99xH5dXz1e3tR3Dz9vLy_uai-sKLWQVikluXD2KbZP3mgaQPfReg29FF76lpvW6WjBRC5N9L2U0fnoLXjgWhyx77u-c06vS8DSbQb0YRzdFNKCHRfGWBD8M1AYUM1nYGOUlARP_4PrtOSJpiVDQTRGc0Pq2075nBBziN2chw1tqOPQvcXYvcX4zmaH3o0xu8kP-M9aRSFLIHayY2ssKX_c6g_o5qTx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300228718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interference Among Oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, Feeding on Mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe Estuary</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Ens, B. J. ; Goss-Custard, J. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ens, B. J. ; Goss-Custard, J. D.</creatorcontrib><description>(1) Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus eating mussels Mytilus edulis on the Exe Estuary were aggressive and often stole mussels from each other. A stable and linear dominance hierarchy existed amongst ten birds studied in detail. The intake rates (biomass consumed per 10 min foraging) of six out of eight birds on which adequate data were obtained, decreased with increasing densities of oystercatchers. However, this did not happen in the two top-dominant individuals, which therefore did not seem to suffer from interference. (2) Interference in the subdominants was due to increased intraspecific kleptoparasitism, to decreased capture rates probably caused by avoidance, and, perhaps, to increased time spent in aggression. Subdominants avoided high densities of conspecifics, but they did not stop feeding when high densities occurred. (3) It is possible to account for our data in terms of the increased opportunities for dominants to steal food from subdominants at high bird densities. Competition for small-scale feeding sites may have been important too. It is suggested that the dispersion of oystercatchers over the mussel bed can be described by a modification of the `ideal despotic distribution' proposed by Fretwell (1972).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/4353</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Birds ; Brackish ; Carrion ; Correlation coefficients ; Crows ; Density ; Estuaries ; Food supply ; Foraging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Haematopus ostralegus ; Marine ; Mussels ; Mytilus edulis ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 1984-01, Vol.53 (1), p.217-231</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1984 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>1984 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-349666413a9bf5bc870217df9c70d43c4c5185a7f908f148fcd44facfc90c0173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4353$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4353$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9636540$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ens, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goss-Custard, J. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Interference Among Oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, Feeding on Mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe Estuary</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><description>(1) Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus eating mussels Mytilus edulis on the Exe Estuary were aggressive and often stole mussels from each other. A stable and linear dominance hierarchy existed amongst ten birds studied in detail. The intake rates (biomass consumed per 10 min foraging) of six out of eight birds on which adequate data were obtained, decreased with increasing densities of oystercatchers. However, this did not happen in the two top-dominant individuals, which therefore did not seem to suffer from interference. (2) Interference in the subdominants was due to increased intraspecific kleptoparasitism, to decreased capture rates probably caused by avoidance, and, perhaps, to increased time spent in aggression. Subdominants avoided high densities of conspecifics, but they did not stop feeding when high densities occurred. (3) It is possible to account for our data in terms of the increased opportunities for dominants to steal food from subdominants at high bird densities. Competition for small-scale feeding sites may have been important too. It is suggested that the dispersion of oystercatchers over the mussel bed can be described by a modification of the `ideal despotic distribution' proposed by Fretwell (1972).</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Carrion</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Crows</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Haematopus ostralegus</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mussels</subject><subject>Mytilus edulis</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0c9LHTEQB_AgCn1q_4cVS09dnWyy-XEU0SooXux5idlE97Fvs2ay0Pffd-SVCsWDhxAy-TAw82XsmMNZI0CfS9GKPbbiQrV1o1q1z1YADa-NtvCFHSKuAUA3IFZsvp1KyDHkMPlQXWzS9Fw9bJFq3hX_EjL-qG5c2LiS5gWrhCW7MTwvVL4OoR-Ip6m6XxDDSLX7bRlGcqFfxoHe9FdeQnX1mw6WxeXtMTuIbsTw9e99xH5dXz1e3tR3Dz9vLy_uai-sKLWQVikluXD2KbZP3mgaQPfReg29FF76lpvW6WjBRC5N9L2U0fnoLXjgWhyx77u-c06vS8DSbQb0YRzdFNKCHRfGWBD8M1AYUM1nYGOUlARP_4PrtOSJpiVDQTRGc0Pq2075nBBziN2chw1tqOPQvcXYvcX4zmaH3o0xu8kP-M9aRSFLIHayY2ssKX_c6g_o5qTx</recordid><startdate>19840101</startdate><enddate>19840101</enddate><creator>Ens, B. J.</creator><creator>Goss-Custard, J. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840101</creationdate><title>Interference Among Oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, Feeding on Mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe Estuary</title><author>Ens, B. J. ; Goss-Custard, J. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-349666413a9bf5bc870217df9c70d43c4c5185a7f908f148fcd44facfc90c0173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Carrion</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Crows</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Haematopus ostralegus</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mussels</topic><topic>Mytilus edulis</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ens, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goss-Custard, J. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ens, B. J.</au><au>Goss-Custard, J. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interference Among Oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, Feeding on Mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe Estuary</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><date>1984-01-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>217-231</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>(1) Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus eating mussels Mytilus edulis on the Exe Estuary were aggressive and often stole mussels from each other. A stable and linear dominance hierarchy existed amongst ten birds studied in detail. The intake rates (biomass consumed per 10 min foraging) of six out of eight birds on which adequate data were obtained, decreased with increasing densities of oystercatchers. However, this did not happen in the two top-dominant individuals, which therefore did not seem to suffer from interference. (2) Interference in the subdominants was due to increased intraspecific kleptoparasitism, to decreased capture rates probably caused by avoidance, and, perhaps, to increased time spent in aggression. Subdominants avoided high densities of conspecifics, but they did not stop feeding when high densities occurred. (3) It is possible to account for our data in terms of the increased opportunities for dominants to steal food from subdominants at high bird densities. Competition for small-scale feeding sites may have been important too. It is suggested that the dispersion of oystercatchers over the mussel bed can be described by a modification of the `ideal despotic distribution' proposed by Fretwell (1972).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publications</pub><doi>10.2307/4353</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8790
ispartof The Journal of animal ecology, 1984-01, Vol.53 (1), p.217-231
issn 0021-8790
1365-2656
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_13889031
source JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Animal ethology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Birds
Brackish
Carrion
Correlation coefficients
Crows
Density
Estuaries
Food supply
Foraging
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Haematopus ostralegus
Marine
Mussels
Mytilus edulis
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Vertebrata
title Interference Among Oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, Feeding on Mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe Estuary
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A02%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interference%20Among%20Oystercatchers,%20Haematopus%20ostralegus,%20Feeding%20on%20Mussels,%20Mytilus%20edulis,%20on%20the%20Exe%20Estuary&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Ens,%20B.%20J.&rft.date=1984-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=217-231&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/4353&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4353%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-349666413a9bf5bc870217df9c70d43c4c5185a7f908f148fcd44facfc90c0173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300228718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4353&rfr_iscdi=true