Loading…
Population dynamics of Ascaridia galli following single infection in young chickens
The population dynamics of Ascaridia galli was studied in 70 ISA Brown layer pullets, 42 of them were each experimentally infected with 500 embryonated A. galli eggs and 28 chickens were kept as uninfected controls. Six chickens from the infected group and 4 from the control group were necropsied at...
Saved in:
Published in: | Parasitology 2013-08, Vol.140 (9), p.1078-1084 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-8e020f7e3e3acef940ee03dc4592b5faeed3a6515b605b463b446529d9b4f5f43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-8e020f7e3e3acef940ee03dc4592b5faeed3a6515b605b463b446529d9b4f5f43 |
container_end_page | 1084 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1078 |
container_title | Parasitology |
container_volume | 140 |
creator | FERDUSHY, TANIA LUNA-OLIVARES, LUZ ADILIA NEJSUM, PETER ROEPSTORFF, ALLAN KNUD THAMSBORG, STIG MILAN KYVSGAARD, NIELS CHRISTIAN |
description | The population dynamics of Ascaridia galli was studied in 70 ISA Brown layer pullets, 42 of them were each experimentally infected with 500 embryonated A. galli eggs and 28 chickens were kept as uninfected controls. Six chickens from the infected group and 4 from the control group were necropsied at 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 and 42 days post-infection (d.p.i.). The mean worm recovery varied from 11–20% of the infection dose with the highest recovery at 3 d.p.i. and the lowest at 21 and 42 d.p.i. (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0031182013000401 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399921877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0031182013000401</cupid><sourcerecordid>1399921877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-8e020f7e3e3acef940ee03dc4592b5faeed3a6515b605b463b446529d9b4f5f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYMoTs_oD3CjBW7clN6bV1WWwzA-YEChnXWRSt20GVOVttLF0P_etN2KKIKLJIvznXNvOIw9Q3iNgM2bNYBAbDmgAAAJ-ICtUGpTt6jxIVsd5Pqgn7HznO8Ko4Xmj9kZF7oRaNoVW39K2yXaXUhTNewnOwaXq-Sry-zsHIZgq42NMVQ-xZjuw7SpcrkiVWHy5H7YwlTt01IU9yW4rzTlJ-yRtzHT09N7wW7fXn--el_ffHz34erypnZSwK5uCTj4hgQJ68gbCUQgBieV4b3ylmgQVitUvQbVSy16KbXiZjC99MpLccFeHXO3c_q2UN51Y8iOYrQTpSV3KIwxHNum-Q-04Q1wLnhBX_6B3qVlnspHDhQaaFCqQuGRcnPKeSbfbecw2nnfIXSHcrq_yime56fkpR9p-OX42UYBXhwBb1NnN3PI3e26BGgoxyhpCiFOY-3Yl3429Nt2_xz8HV-EoM0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1371907145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population dynamics of Ascaridia galli following single infection in young chickens</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>FERDUSHY, TANIA ; LUNA-OLIVARES, LUZ ADILIA ; NEJSUM, PETER ; ROEPSTORFF, ALLAN KNUD ; THAMSBORG, STIG MILAN ; KYVSGAARD, NIELS CHRISTIAN</creator><creatorcontrib>FERDUSHY, TANIA ; LUNA-OLIVARES, LUZ ADILIA ; NEJSUM, PETER ; ROEPSTORFF, ALLAN KNUD ; THAMSBORG, STIG MILAN ; KYVSGAARD, NIELS CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><description>The population dynamics of Ascaridia galli was studied in 70 ISA Brown layer pullets, 42 of them were each experimentally infected with 500 embryonated A. galli eggs and 28 chickens were kept as uninfected controls. Six chickens from the infected group and 4 from the control group were necropsied at 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 and 42 days post-infection (d.p.i.). The mean worm recovery varied from 11–20% of the infection dose with the highest recovery at 3 d.p.i. and the lowest at 21 and 42 d.p.i. (P < 0·05). More larvae were recovered from the intestinal wall than from the content (P < 0·0001) and intestinal content larvae were longer than those from the wall (mean length 1·6 and 1 mm, respectively, P < 0·0001). Although larvae were growing over time, a population of small-sized larvae (length < 1 mm) was recovered at all d.p.i. During the first week of infection most of the larvae were located in the anterior half of the jejunoileum but they moved posteriorly with the age of infection. Thus, a subpopulation of larvae mainly in the lumen grew with time while another subpopulation remained small and associated with the mucosa. During the infection both subpopulations moved to a more posterior localization in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-1820</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-8161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8161</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0031182013000401</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23673198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ascaridia - physiology ; Ascaridia galli ; Ascaridiasis - epidemiology ; Ascaridiasis - parasitology ; Ascaridiasis - veterinary ; Chickens ; Chickens - parasitology ; Feces - parasitology ; Female ; Galli ; Gastrointestinal Tract - parasitology ; Larva ; Larvae ; Parasite Egg Count - veterinary ; Population Dynamics ; Poultry Diseases - epidemiology ; Poultry Diseases - parasitology ; Subpopulations</subject><ispartof>Parasitology, 2013-08, Vol.140 (9), p.1078-1084</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-8e020f7e3e3acef940ee03dc4592b5faeed3a6515b605b463b446529d9b4f5f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-8e020f7e3e3acef940ee03dc4592b5faeed3a6515b605b463b446529d9b4f5f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0031182013000401/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23673198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FERDUSHY, TANIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNA-OLIVARES, LUZ ADILIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEJSUM, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROEPSTORFF, ALLAN KNUD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THAMSBORG, STIG MILAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KYVSGAARD, NIELS CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><title>Population dynamics of Ascaridia galli following single infection in young chickens</title><title>Parasitology</title><addtitle>Parasitology</addtitle><description>The population dynamics of Ascaridia galli was studied in 70 ISA Brown layer pullets, 42 of them were each experimentally infected with 500 embryonated A. galli eggs and 28 chickens were kept as uninfected controls. Six chickens from the infected group and 4 from the control group were necropsied at 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 and 42 days post-infection (d.p.i.). The mean worm recovery varied from 11–20% of the infection dose with the highest recovery at 3 d.p.i. and the lowest at 21 and 42 d.p.i. (P < 0·05). More larvae were recovered from the intestinal wall than from the content (P < 0·0001) and intestinal content larvae were longer than those from the wall (mean length 1·6 and 1 mm, respectively, P < 0·0001). Although larvae were growing over time, a population of small-sized larvae (length < 1 mm) was recovered at all d.p.i. During the first week of infection most of the larvae were located in the anterior half of the jejunoileum but they moved posteriorly with the age of infection. Thus, a subpopulation of larvae mainly in the lumen grew with time while another subpopulation remained small and associated with the mucosa. During the infection both subpopulations moved to a more posterior localization in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ascaridia - physiology</subject><subject>Ascaridia galli</subject><subject>Ascaridiasis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ascaridiasis - parasitology</subject><subject>Ascaridiasis - veterinary</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Chickens - parasitology</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Galli</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Tract - parasitology</subject><subject>Larva</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Parasite Egg Count - veterinary</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Poultry Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Subpopulations</subject><issn>0031-1820</issn><issn>1469-8161</issn><issn>1469-8161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUuLFDEUhYMoTs_oD3CjBW7clN6bV1WWwzA-YEChnXWRSt20GVOVttLF0P_etN2KKIKLJIvznXNvOIw9Q3iNgM2bNYBAbDmgAAAJ-ICtUGpTt6jxIVsd5Pqgn7HznO8Ko4Xmj9kZF7oRaNoVW39K2yXaXUhTNewnOwaXq-Sry-zsHIZgq42NMVQ-xZjuw7SpcrkiVWHy5H7YwlTt01IU9yW4rzTlJ-yRtzHT09N7wW7fXn--el_ffHz34erypnZSwK5uCTj4hgQJ68gbCUQgBieV4b3ylmgQVitUvQbVSy16KbXiZjC99MpLccFeHXO3c_q2UN51Y8iOYrQTpSV3KIwxHNum-Q-04Q1wLnhBX_6B3qVlnspHDhQaaFCqQuGRcnPKeSbfbecw2nnfIXSHcrq_yime56fkpR9p-OX42UYBXhwBb1NnN3PI3e26BGgoxyhpCiFOY-3Yl3429Nt2_xz8HV-EoM0</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>FERDUSHY, TANIA</creator><creator>LUNA-OLIVARES, LUZ ADILIA</creator><creator>NEJSUM, PETER</creator><creator>ROEPSTORFF, ALLAN KNUD</creator><creator>THAMSBORG, STIG MILAN</creator><creator>KYVSGAARD, NIELS CHRISTIAN</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Population dynamics of Ascaridia galli following single infection in young chickens</title><author>FERDUSHY, TANIA ; LUNA-OLIVARES, LUZ ADILIA ; NEJSUM, PETER ; ROEPSTORFF, ALLAN KNUD ; THAMSBORG, STIG MILAN ; KYVSGAARD, NIELS CHRISTIAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-8e020f7e3e3acef940ee03dc4592b5faeed3a6515b605b463b446529d9b4f5f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ascaridia - physiology</topic><topic>Ascaridia galli</topic><topic>Ascaridiasis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ascaridiasis - parasitology</topic><topic>Ascaridiasis - veterinary</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Chickens - parasitology</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Galli</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Tract - parasitology</topic><topic>Larva</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Parasite Egg Count - veterinary</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Poultry Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Subpopulations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FERDUSHY, TANIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNA-OLIVARES, LUZ ADILIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEJSUM, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROEPSTORFF, ALLAN KNUD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THAMSBORG, STIG MILAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KYVSGAARD, NIELS CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FERDUSHY, TANIA</au><au>LUNA-OLIVARES, LUZ ADILIA</au><au>NEJSUM, PETER</au><au>ROEPSTORFF, ALLAN KNUD</au><au>THAMSBORG, STIG MILAN</au><au>KYVSGAARD, NIELS CHRISTIAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population dynamics of Ascaridia galli following single infection in young chickens</atitle><jtitle>Parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Parasitology</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1078</spage><epage>1084</epage><pages>1078-1084</pages><issn>0031-1820</issn><issn>1469-8161</issn><eissn>1469-8161</eissn><abstract>The population dynamics of Ascaridia galli was studied in 70 ISA Brown layer pullets, 42 of them were each experimentally infected with 500 embryonated A. galli eggs and 28 chickens were kept as uninfected controls. Six chickens from the infected group and 4 from the control group were necropsied at 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 and 42 days post-infection (d.p.i.). The mean worm recovery varied from 11–20% of the infection dose with the highest recovery at 3 d.p.i. and the lowest at 21 and 42 d.p.i. (P < 0·05). More larvae were recovered from the intestinal wall than from the content (P < 0·0001) and intestinal content larvae were longer than those from the wall (mean length 1·6 and 1 mm, respectively, P < 0·0001). Although larvae were growing over time, a population of small-sized larvae (length < 1 mm) was recovered at all d.p.i. During the first week of infection most of the larvae were located in the anterior half of the jejunoileum but they moved posteriorly with the age of infection. Thus, a subpopulation of larvae mainly in the lumen grew with time while another subpopulation remained small and associated with the mucosa. During the infection both subpopulations moved to a more posterior localization in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>23673198</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0031182013000401</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-1820 |
ispartof | Parasitology, 2013-08, Vol.140 (9), p.1078-1084 |
issn | 0031-1820 1469-8161 1469-8161 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1399921877 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online |
subjects | Animals Ascaridia - physiology Ascaridia galli Ascaridiasis - epidemiology Ascaridiasis - parasitology Ascaridiasis - veterinary Chickens Chickens - parasitology Feces - parasitology Female Galli Gastrointestinal Tract - parasitology Larva Larvae Parasite Egg Count - veterinary Population Dynamics Poultry Diseases - epidemiology Poultry Diseases - parasitology Subpopulations |
title | Population dynamics of Ascaridia galli following single infection in young chickens |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A01%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%20dynamics%20of%20Ascaridia%20galli%20following%20single%20infection%20in%20young%20chickens&rft.jtitle=Parasitology&rft.au=FERDUSHY,%20TANIA&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1078&rft.epage=1084&rft.pages=1078-1084&rft.issn=0031-1820&rft.eissn=1469-8161&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0031182013000401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1399921877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-8e020f7e3e3acef940ee03dc4592b5faeed3a6515b605b463b446529d9b4f5f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1371907145&rft_id=info:pmid/23673198&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0031182013000401&rfr_iscdi=true |