The role of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) in pediatric trauma evaluation

Abstract Purpose With increasing concerns about radiation exposure, we questioned whether a structured program of FAST might decrease CT use. Methods All pediatric trauma surgeons in our level 1 pediatric trauma center underwent formal FAST training. Children with potential abdominal trauma and no p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pediatric surgery 2013-06, Vol.48 (6), p.1377-1383
Main Authors: Scaife, Eric R, Rollins, Michael D, Barnhart, Douglas C, Downey, Earl C, Black, Richard E, Meyers, Rebecka L, Stevens, Mark H, Gordon, Sasha, Prince, Jeffrey S, Battaglia, Deborah, Fenton, Stephen J, Plumb, Jennifer, Metzger, Ryan R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abdominal Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Abdominal Injuries - therapy
Adolescent
Attitude of Health Personnel
Child
Child, Preschool
Clinical Competence
Decision Support Techniques
Education, Medical, Continuing
False Negative Reactions
Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST)
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Pediatric trauma
Pediatrics
Pediatrics - education
Pediatrics - methods
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Traumatology - education
Traumatology - methods
Ultrasonography
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Purpose With increasing concerns about radiation exposure, we questioned whether a structured program of FAST might decrease CT use. Methods All pediatric trauma surgeons in our level 1 pediatric trauma center underwent formal FAST training. Children with potential abdominal trauma and no prior imaging were prospectively evaluated from 10/2/09 to 7/31/11. After physical exam and FAST, the surgeon declared whether the CT could be eliminated. Results Of 536 children who arrived without imaging, 183 had potential abdominal trauma. FAST was performed in 128 cases and recorded completely in 88. In 48% (42/88) the surgeon would have elected to cancel the CT based on the FAST and physical exam. One of the 42 cases had a positive FAST and required emergent laparotomy; the others were negative. The sensitivity of FAST for injuries requiring operation or blood transfusion was 87.5%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in detecting pathologic free fluid were 50%, 85%, 53.8%, and 87.9%. Conclusions True positive FAST exams are uncommon and would rarely direct management. While the negative FAST would have potentially reduced CT use due to practitioner reassurance, this reassurance may be unwarranted given the test's sensitivity.
ISSN:0022-3468
1531-5037
DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.03.038