CONFLICT AMONG THE CIRCUITS: WHO MAY CONDUCT INSPECTIONS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT?

Federal circuit courts disagree over who may conduct inspections of industrial plants under the Clean Air Act. In bunker hill V. Environmental Protection Agency, the 9th circuit has held that EPA can authorize an employee of a private contractor to conduct an inspection for possible emissions violat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Natural resources journal 1983-01, Vol.23 (1), p.175-189
Main Author: SIMMONS, NANCY L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
COMMENT
Environmental agencies
Environmental legislation
Federal district courts
Human resources
Inspection stations
Legislatures
Magistrates
Natural resources
United States Senate
Warrants
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 189
container_issue 1
container_start_page 175
container_title Natural resources journal
container_volume 23
creator SIMMONS, NANCY L.
description Federal circuit courts disagree over who may conduct inspections of industrial plants under the Clean Air Act. In bunker hill V. Environmental Protection Agency, the 9th circuit has held that EPA can authorize an employee of a private contractor to conduct an inspection for possible emissions violations. The question then arises over who will control EPA inspections: the plant being inspected, EPA, or the private contractor. At the heart of all subsequent litigation lies the question of congressional intent, or the meaning behind the Clean Air Act.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14167949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24882455</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24882455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j166t-a976702be96151eea91924f2ea7d6d2a2a7c880066cdcc870650c1221ed2f0d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzktLw0AABOBFFKzVnyAsCN4C-8o-vEjYpu1CmmiTIJ7CmmyhoW1qtj34702JJ0_DwMcwV2BCOEMBwUxdgwlCRAZIUHUL7rxv0aVjOgHvOkvnidEFjFZZuoDFMobarHVpivwFfiwzuIo-4YBm5WBMmr_FujBZmsMyncXr0SdxlMLIrGGki9d7cLOxO-8e_nIKynlc6GWQZAujoyRoMeenwCrBBSJfTnEcYueswoqwDXFWNLwhllhRS4kQ53VT11IgHqIaE4JdQzaoEXQKnsfdY999n50_Vfutr91uZw-uO_sKM8yFYmqAT_9g2537w_CtwpIqySlll7nHUbX-1PXVsd_ubf9TESYlYWFIfwE6DVqT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839863347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CONFLICT AMONG THE CIRCUITS: WHO MAY CONDUCT INSPECTIONS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>SIMMONS, NANCY L.</creator><creatorcontrib>SIMMONS, NANCY L.</creatorcontrib><description>Federal circuit courts disagree over who may conduct inspections of industrial plants under the Clean Air Act. In bunker hill V. Environmental Protection Agency, the 9th circuit has held that EPA can authorize an employee of a private contractor to conduct an inspection for possible emissions violations. The question then arises over who will control EPA inspections: the plant being inspected, EPA, or the private contractor. At the heart of all subsequent litigation lies the question of congressional intent, or the meaning behind the Clean Air Act.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2640-2149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Albuquerque: University of New Mexico School of Law</publisher><subject>COMMENT ; Environmental agencies ; Environmental legislation ; Federal district courts ; Human resources ; Inspection stations ; Legislatures ; Magistrates ; Natural resources ; United States Senate ; Warrants</subject><ispartof>Natural resources journal, 1983-01, Vol.23 (1), p.175-189</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1983 Natural Resources Journal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24882455$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24882455$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SIMMONS, NANCY L.</creatorcontrib><title>CONFLICT AMONG THE CIRCUITS: WHO MAY CONDUCT INSPECTIONS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT?</title><title>Natural resources journal</title><description>Federal circuit courts disagree over who may conduct inspections of industrial plants under the Clean Air Act. In bunker hill V. Environmental Protection Agency, the 9th circuit has held that EPA can authorize an employee of a private contractor to conduct an inspection for possible emissions violations. The question then arises over who will control EPA inspections: the plant being inspected, EPA, or the private contractor. At the heart of all subsequent litigation lies the question of congressional intent, or the meaning behind the Clean Air Act.</description><subject>COMMENT</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Environmental legislation</subject><subject>Federal district courts</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Inspection stations</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Magistrates</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>United States Senate</subject><subject>Warrants</subject><issn>0028-0739</issn><issn>2640-2149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdzktLw0AABOBFFKzVnyAsCN4C-8o-vEjYpu1CmmiTIJ7CmmyhoW1qtj34702JJ0_DwMcwV2BCOEMBwUxdgwlCRAZIUHUL7rxv0aVjOgHvOkvnidEFjFZZuoDFMobarHVpivwFfiwzuIo-4YBm5WBMmr_FujBZmsMyncXr0SdxlMLIrGGki9d7cLOxO-8e_nIKynlc6GWQZAujoyRoMeenwCrBBSJfTnEcYueswoqwDXFWNLwhllhRS4kQ53VT11IgHqIaE4JdQzaoEXQKnsfdY999n50_Vfutr91uZw-uO_sKM8yFYmqAT_9g2537w_CtwpIqySlll7nHUbX-1PXVsd_ubf9TESYlYWFIfwE6DVqT</recordid><startdate>19830101</startdate><enddate>19830101</enddate><creator>SIMMONS, NANCY L.</creator><general>University of New Mexico School of Law</general><general>Albuquerque :University of New Mexico, School of Law</general><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830101</creationdate><title>CONFLICT AMONG THE CIRCUITS: WHO MAY CONDUCT INSPECTIONS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT?</title><author>SIMMONS, NANCY L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j166t-a976702be96151eea91924f2ea7d6d2a2a7c880066cdcc870650c1221ed2f0d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>COMMENT</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Environmental legislation</topic><topic>Federal district courts</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Inspection stations</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Magistrates</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>United States Senate</topic><topic>Warrants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SIMMONS, NANCY L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural resources journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SIMMONS, NANCY L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CONFLICT AMONG THE CIRCUITS: WHO MAY CONDUCT INSPECTIONS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT?</atitle><jtitle>Natural resources journal</jtitle><date>1983-01-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>175-189</pages><issn>0028-0739</issn><eissn>2640-2149</eissn><abstract>Federal circuit courts disagree over who may conduct inspections of industrial plants under the Clean Air Act. In bunker hill V. Environmental Protection Agency, the 9th circuit has held that EPA can authorize an employee of a private contractor to conduct an inspection for possible emissions violations. The question then arises over who will control EPA inspections: the plant being inspected, EPA, or the private contractor. At the heart of all subsequent litigation lies the question of congressional intent, or the meaning behind the Clean Air Act.</abstract><cop>Albuquerque</cop><pub>University of New Mexico School of Law</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-0739
ispartof Natural resources journal, 1983-01, Vol.23 (1), p.175-189
issn 0028-0739
2640-2149
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14167949
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects COMMENT
Environmental agencies
Environmental legislation
Federal district courts
Human resources
Inspection stations
Legislatures
Magistrates
Natural resources
United States Senate
Warrants
title CONFLICT AMONG THE CIRCUITS: WHO MAY CONDUCT INSPECTIONS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A57%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CONFLICT%20AMONG%20THE%20CIRCUITS:%20WHO%20MAY%20CONDUCT%20INSPECTIONS%20UNDER%20THE%20CLEAN%20AIR%20ACT?&rft.jtitle=Natural%20resources%20journal&rft.au=SIMMONS,%20NANCY%20L.&rft.date=1983-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=175-189&rft.issn=0028-0739&rft.eissn=2640-2149&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24882455%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j166t-a976702be96151eea91924f2ea7d6d2a2a7c880066cdcc870650c1221ed2f0d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839863347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24882455&rfr_iscdi=true