Loading…
Comment: At Play in the Fields of Framing. Or, Why Framing? From Play to Work in Ritual Process
Comment in a special journal issue on "Ritual Framing: Gregory Bateson." Strathern and Stewart contrast the static frame as conceived by Gregory Bateson with the dynamic, 'moebius strip' frame as conceived by Don Handelman. This distinction may help us to understand further what...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of ritual studies 2012-01, Vol.26 (2), p.79-80 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 80 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Journal of ritual studies |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Strathern, Andrew Stewart, Pamela J. |
description | Comment in a special journal issue on "Ritual Framing: Gregory Bateson." Strathern and Stewart contrast the static frame as conceived by Gregory Bateson with the dynamic, 'moebius strip' frame as conceived by Don Handelman. This distinction may help us to understand further what the different instances of framing in ritual processes are actually about. The authors explore this notion as applied to the Female Spirit complex in Hagen society. Adapted from the source document. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1417859066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44368857</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44368857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j886-2dc1dfffb10477f4427235ddc0ee1ca9a3cd1aa140e30320b537e6ac031fd3e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj0FLwzAcxXtQcE4_gpCjBytJkyatFxnFTmGwIYMdS5b841rbZibpod_eSvXs6T0ev_fgXUQLnOU4JoQkV9G19w3GhIiML6KqsF0HfXhCq4B2rRxR3aNwAlTW0GqPrEGlk13dfzyirXtAh9P4FzxPxnZzKVh0sO7zp_xeh0G2aOesAu9voksjWw-3v7qM9uXLvniNN9v1W7HaxE2W8TjRimhjzJFgJoRhLBEJTbVWGIAomUuqNJGSMAwU0wQfUyqAS4UpMZoCo8vofp49O_s1gA9VV3sFbSt7sIOvCJvupjnm_H-UCsoSzlI8oXcz2vhgXXV2dSfdWDFGeZalgn4D0d1mkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1373426450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment: At Play in the Fields of Framing. Or, Why Framing? From Play to Work in Ritual Process</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Strathern, Andrew ; Stewart, Pamela J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Strathern, Andrew ; Stewart, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><description>Comment in a special journal issue on "Ritual Framing: Gregory Bateson." Strathern and Stewart contrast the static frame as conceived by Gregory Bateson with the dynamic, 'moebius strip' frame as conceived by Don Handelman. This distinction may help us to understand further what the different instances of framing in ritual processes are actually about. The authors explore this notion as applied to the Female Spirit complex in Hagen society. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-1112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh</publisher><subject>Authors ; Bateson, Gregory ; Cults ; Females ; Men ; Philosophy ; Religious rituals ; Ritual ; Rituals ; Scholarly publishing</subject><ispartof>Journal of ritual studies, 2012-01, Vol.26 (2), p.79-80</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Journal of Ritual Studies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44368857$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44368857$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33224,33775,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strathern, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comment: At Play in the Fields of Framing. Or, Why Framing? From Play to Work in Ritual Process</title><title>Journal of ritual studies</title><description>Comment in a special journal issue on "Ritual Framing: Gregory Bateson." Strathern and Stewart contrast the static frame as conceived by Gregory Bateson with the dynamic, 'moebius strip' frame as conceived by Don Handelman. This distinction may help us to understand further what the different instances of framing in ritual processes are actually about. The authors explore this notion as applied to the Female Spirit complex in Hagen society. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Authors</subject><subject>Bateson, Gregory</subject><subject>Cults</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>Ritual</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><issn>0890-1112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFj0FLwzAcxXtQcE4_gpCjBytJkyatFxnFTmGwIYMdS5b841rbZibpod_eSvXs6T0ev_fgXUQLnOU4JoQkV9G19w3GhIiML6KqsF0HfXhCq4B2rRxR3aNwAlTW0GqPrEGlk13dfzyirXtAh9P4FzxPxnZzKVh0sO7zp_xeh0G2aOesAu9voksjWw-3v7qM9uXLvniNN9v1W7HaxE2W8TjRimhjzJFgJoRhLBEJTbVWGIAomUuqNJGSMAwU0wQfUyqAS4UpMZoCo8vofp49O_s1gA9VV3sFbSt7sIOvCJvupjnm_H-UCsoSzlI8oXcz2vhgXXV2dSfdWDFGeZalgn4D0d1mkg</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Strathern, Andrew</creator><creator>Stewart, Pamela J.</creator><general>Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Comment: At Play in the Fields of Framing. Or, Why Framing? From Play to Work in Ritual Process</title><author>Strathern, Andrew ; Stewart, Pamela J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j886-2dc1dfffb10477f4427235ddc0ee1ca9a3cd1aa140e30320b537e6ac031fd3e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Authors</topic><topic>Bateson, Gregory</topic><topic>Cults</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>Ritual</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strathern, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Pamela J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of ritual studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strathern, Andrew</au><au>Stewart, Pamela J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment: At Play in the Fields of Framing. Or, Why Framing? From Play to Work in Ritual Process</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ritual studies</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>79-80</pages><issn>0890-1112</issn><abstract>Comment in a special journal issue on "Ritual Framing: Gregory Bateson." Strathern and Stewart contrast the static frame as conceived by Gregory Bateson with the dynamic, 'moebius strip' frame as conceived by Don Handelman. This distinction may help us to understand further what the different instances of framing in ritual processes are actually about. The authors explore this notion as applied to the Female Spirit complex in Hagen society. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><pub>Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh</pub><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-1112 |
ispartof | Journal of ritual studies, 2012-01, Vol.26 (2), p.79-80 |
issn | 0890-1112 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1417859066 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Authors Bateson, Gregory Cults Females Men Philosophy Religious rituals Ritual Rituals Scholarly publishing |
title | Comment: At Play in the Fields of Framing. Or, Why Framing? From Play to Work in Ritual Process |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A43%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment:%20At%20Play%20in%20the%20Fields%20of%20Framing.%20Or,%20Why%20Framing?%20From%20Play%20to%20Work%20in%20Ritual%20Process&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ritual%20studies&rft.au=Strathern,%20Andrew&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=79-80&rft.issn=0890-1112&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44368857%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j886-2dc1dfffb10477f4427235ddc0ee1ca9a3cd1aa140e30320b537e6ac031fd3e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1373426450&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44368857&rfr_iscdi=true |