Implicit theories block negative attributions about a longstanding adversary: The case of Israelis and Arabs

• Published in: Journal of experimental social psychology 2013-07, Vol.49 (4), p.670-675
• Main Authors: Levontin, Liat, Halperin, Eran, Dweck, Carol S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arab countries; Arab Israeli relations; Arabs; Attitudes; Attributions; Case studies; Conflict; Conflict resolution; Implicit theories; Interethnic relations; Intergroup relations; Israel; Manipulation; Personality traits; Psychological effects; Social psychology; Stereotypes; Theory
• ISSN: 0022-1031; 1096-0465
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.002

Attributing the negative behavior of an adversary to underlying dispositions inflames negative attitudes. In two studies, by manipulating both implicit theories and attributions, we show that the negative impact of dispositional attributions can be reduced. Both studies showed that inducing an incremental theory (“traits are malleable”) in Israelis kept negative attitudes toward Arabs low (Study1), and political tolerance and willingness to compromise for peace high (Study 2), even when people were oriented toward dispositional attributions. Thus an incremental theory blocked the negative effect of dispositional attributions. Inducing an entity theory (“traits are fixed”) had a negative effect on attitudes, tolerance, and compromise when dispositional attributions were salient but not when situational attributions were made salient. These findings have important implications for promoting intergroup relations and conflict resolution. ► An incremental theory mutes the impact of attributions on attitudes and preferences. ► Exposure to situational attributions has positive effects for entity theorists. ► An attribution have a different meaning and impact depending on implicit theories. ► Blocking dispositional attributions toward a long-time adversary is possible.