Risk factors for large colon volvulus in the UK

• Published in: Equine veterinary journal 2013-09, Vol.45 (5), p.558-563
• Main Authors: Suthers, J. M., Pinchbeck, G. L., Proudman, C. J., Archer, D. C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Case-Control Studies; colic; Colonic Diseases - epidemiology; Colonic Diseases - pathology; Colonic Diseases - veterinary; horse; Horse Diseases - epidemiology; Horse Diseases - pathology; Horses; Intestinal Volvulus - epidemiology; Intestinal Volvulus - pathology; Intestinal Volvulus - veterinary; large colon volvulus (LCV); Logistic Models; Multivariate Analysis; Risk Factors; strangulating; Studies; survival; United Kingdom - epidemiology
• ISSN: 0425-1644; 2042-3306
• DOI: 10.1111/evj.12039

Summary Reasons for performing study Risk factors for large colon volvulus (LCV) in the horse have not been previously reported. Knowledge of these risk factors may allow the introduction of measures that could be taken to minimise the incidence of LCV. Objectives To investigate risk factors for LCV in the horse. Methods A prospective, multicentre, unmatched case‐control study was conducted over a 24 month period in the UK. Data on 69 cases and 204 control horses, from 4 veterinary hospitals, were obtained via telephone questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify associations between horse and management‐level variables and the likelihood of LCV. Results Increasing height, multiple colic episodes in the previous 12 months and mares, with a greater odds ratio in mares that had previously foaled, were associated with increased risk of LCV. Receiving medication (excluding anthelmintic treatment) in the previous 7 days and quidding behaviour were also associated with increased risk. Management‐level variables associated with greater risk of LCV were an increase in the hours of stabling in the previous 14 days, an increasing number of horses on the premises, and 3 or more people involved in the horse's care. Variables related to nutrition associated with increased risk of LCV were being fed hay, being fed sugar‐beet, a change in pasture in the previous 28 days, and an alteration in the amount of forage fed in the last 7 days. Conclusions This study has identified factors that may assist in the recognition of horses with increased risk of LCV and factors that might be altered to minimise the incidence of LCV. Potential relevance Clinicians can use this information to identify horses at risk of LCV and to provide evidence‐based advice to owners of these horses. See also correspondence by Durham See also correspondence by Durham