Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems

In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certificat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal - American Water Works Association 2013-05, Vol.105 (5), p.E229-E235
Main Authors: Blanchard, Christopher S., Eberle, W. David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Capacity Development
Community capacity building
Compliance
Drinking water
Emergency management
Environmental agencies
Federal Legislation
Financial analysis
financial capacity
Financial management
Financing
Infrastructure
Legislatures
Polls & surveys
Potable water
Revenue
small systems
Small Water Systems
Survey design
Surveys
sustainability
Technical support
Washington
Water management
Water utilities
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington.
ISSN:0003-150X
1551-8833
DOI:10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045