Loading…

Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems

In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certificat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal - American Water Works Association 2013-05, Vol.105 (5), p.E229-E235
Main Authors: Blanchard, Christopher S., Eberle, W. David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643
container_end_page E235
container_issue 5
container_start_page E229
container_title Journal - American Water Works Association
container_volume 105
creator Blanchard, Christopher S.
Eberle, W. David
description In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington.
doi_str_mv 10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419363979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>jamewatworass.105.5.e229</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>jamewatworass.105.5.e229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLxDAQx4MouD4-gZeCFw92zWSSpjku4gsEL4rewmya1ZY-1qRL2W9v64oHT57mwf83DD_GzoDPlZHiqqJhoLnggHPgas65VHtsBkpBmueI-2zGOccUFH87ZEcxVuMICuSM3T1799GWjurLpKGW3n0op57aIlmVLbVuHBNHa3Jlv02o6dr3JDZU18lAvQ9J3MbeN_GEHayojv70px6zl9ub5-v79PHp7uF68Zg6FLlKtcxg5fJiSQYAMg1cC0FCGkc5-mXGC5-jW-ZE6DVoDoVGWRjpC50RZBKP2cXu7jp0nxsfe9uU0fm6ptZ3m2hBgsEMjTZj9PxPtOo2oR2_s4BaoBKop4O4S7nQxRj8yq5D2VDYWuB2kmu_5dpJ7rhSdpI7UmZHDWXtt_9B7OL1dfHDpju2in0XftmKGj8qHbpAMX5jyt4IYfALXkOOrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372352374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Blanchard, Christopher S. ; Eberle, W. David</creator><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Christopher S. ; Eberle, W. David</creatorcontrib><description>In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-8833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAWWA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denver: American Water Works Association</publisher><subject>Capacity Development ; Community capacity building ; Compliance ; Drinking water ; Emergency management ; Environmental agencies ; Federal Legislation ; Financial analysis ; financial capacity ; Financial management ; Financing ; Infrastructure ; Legislatures ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Potable water ; Revenue ; small systems ; Small Water Systems ; Survey design ; Surveys ; sustainability ; Technical support ; Washington ; Water management ; Water utilities</subject><ispartof>Journal - American Water Works Association, 2013-05, Vol.105 (5), p.E229-E235</ispartof><rights>2013 American Water Works Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Water Works Association May 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jamewatworass.105.5.e229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/jamewatworass.105.5.e229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberle, W. David</creatorcontrib><title>Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems</title><title>Journal - American Water Works Association</title><description>In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington.</description><subject>Capacity Development</subject><subject>Community capacity building</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Emergency management</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>financial capacity</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Potable water</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>small systems</subject><subject>Small Water Systems</subject><subject>Survey design</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>Technical support</subject><subject>Washington</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water utilities</subject><issn>0003-150X</issn><issn>1551-8833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLxDAQx4MouD4-gZeCFw92zWSSpjku4gsEL4rewmya1ZY-1qRL2W9v64oHT57mwf83DD_GzoDPlZHiqqJhoLnggHPgas65VHtsBkpBmueI-2zGOccUFH87ZEcxVuMICuSM3T1799GWjurLpKGW3n0op57aIlmVLbVuHBNHa3Jlv02o6dr3JDZU18lAvQ9J3MbeN_GEHayojv70px6zl9ub5-v79PHp7uF68Zg6FLlKtcxg5fJiSQYAMg1cC0FCGkc5-mXGC5-jW-ZE6DVoDoVGWRjpC50RZBKP2cXu7jp0nxsfe9uU0fm6ptZ3m2hBgsEMjTZj9PxPtOo2oR2_s4BaoBKop4O4S7nQxRj8yq5D2VDYWuB2kmu_5dpJ7rhSdpI7UmZHDWXtt_9B7OL1dfHDpju2in0XftmKGj8qHbpAMX5jyt4IYfALXkOOrA</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Blanchard, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Eberle, W. David</creator><general>American Water Works Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems</title><author>Blanchard, Christopher S. ; Eberle, W. David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Capacity Development</topic><topic>Community capacity building</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Emergency management</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>financial capacity</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Potable water</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>small systems</topic><topic>Small Water Systems</topic><topic>Survey design</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>Technical support</topic><topic>Washington</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberle, W. David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blanchard, Christopher S.</au><au>Eberle, W. David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>E229</spage><epage>E235</epage><pages>E229-E235</pages><issn>0003-150X</issn><eissn>1551-8833</eissn><coden>JAWWA5</coden><abstract>In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington.</abstract><cop>Denver</cop><pub>American Water Works Association</pub><doi>10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-150X
ispartof Journal - American Water Works Association, 2013-05, Vol.105 (5), p.E229-E235
issn 0003-150X
1551-8833
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419363979
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Capacity Development
Community capacity building
Compliance
Drinking water
Emergency management
Environmental agencies
Federal Legislation
Financial analysis
financial capacity
Financial management
Financing
Infrastructure
Legislatures
Polls & surveys
Potable water
Revenue
small systems
Small Water Systems
Survey design
Surveys
sustainability
Technical support
Washington
Water management
Water utilities
title Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A33%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical,%20managerial,%20and%20financial%20capacity%20among%20small%20water%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20-%20American%20Water%20Works%20Association&rft.au=Blanchard,%20Christopher%20S.&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=E229&rft.epage=E235&rft.pages=E229-E235&rft.issn=0003-150X&rft.eissn=1551-8833&rft.coden=JAWWA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Ejamewatworass.105.5.e229%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372352374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=jamewatworass.105.5.e229&rfr_iscdi=true