Loading…
Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems
In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certificat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal - American Water Works Association 2013-05, Vol.105 (5), p.E229-E235 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643 |
container_end_page | E235 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | E229 |
container_title | Journal - American Water Works Association |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Blanchard, Christopher S. Eberle, W. David |
description | In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419363979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>jamewatworass.105.5.e229</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>jamewatworass.105.5.e229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLxDAQx4MouD4-gZeCFw92zWSSpjku4gsEL4rewmya1ZY-1qRL2W9v64oHT57mwf83DD_GzoDPlZHiqqJhoLnggHPgas65VHtsBkpBmueI-2zGOccUFH87ZEcxVuMICuSM3T1799GWjurLpKGW3n0op57aIlmVLbVuHBNHa3Jlv02o6dr3JDZU18lAvQ9J3MbeN_GEHayojv70px6zl9ub5-v79PHp7uF68Zg6FLlKtcxg5fJiSQYAMg1cC0FCGkc5-mXGC5-jW-ZE6DVoDoVGWRjpC50RZBKP2cXu7jp0nxsfe9uU0fm6ptZ3m2hBgsEMjTZj9PxPtOo2oR2_s4BaoBKop4O4S7nQxRj8yq5D2VDYWuB2kmu_5dpJ7rhSdpI7UmZHDWXtt_9B7OL1dfHDpju2in0XftmKGj8qHbpAMX5jyt4IYfALXkOOrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372352374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Blanchard, Christopher S. ; Eberle, W. David</creator><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Christopher S. ; Eberle, W. David</creatorcontrib><description>In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-8833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAWWA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denver: American Water Works Association</publisher><subject>Capacity Development ; Community capacity building ; Compliance ; Drinking water ; Emergency management ; Environmental agencies ; Federal Legislation ; Financial analysis ; financial capacity ; Financial management ; Financing ; Infrastructure ; Legislatures ; Polls & surveys ; Potable water ; Revenue ; small systems ; Small Water Systems ; Survey design ; Surveys ; sustainability ; Technical support ; Washington ; Water management ; Water utilities</subject><ispartof>Journal - American Water Works Association, 2013-05, Vol.105 (5), p.E229-E235</ispartof><rights>2013 American Water Works Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Water Works Association May 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jamewatworass.105.5.e229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/jamewatworass.105.5.e229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberle, W. David</creatorcontrib><title>Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems</title><title>Journal - American Water Works Association</title><description>In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington.</description><subject>Capacity Development</subject><subject>Community capacity building</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Emergency management</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>financial capacity</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Potable water</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>small systems</subject><subject>Small Water Systems</subject><subject>Survey design</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><subject>Technical support</subject><subject>Washington</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water utilities</subject><issn>0003-150X</issn><issn>1551-8833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLxDAQx4MouD4-gZeCFw92zWSSpjku4gsEL4rewmya1ZY-1qRL2W9v64oHT57mwf83DD_GzoDPlZHiqqJhoLnggHPgas65VHtsBkpBmueI-2zGOccUFH87ZEcxVuMICuSM3T1799GWjurLpKGW3n0op57aIlmVLbVuHBNHa3Jlv02o6dr3JDZU18lAvQ9J3MbeN_GEHayojv70px6zl9ub5-v79PHp7uF68Zg6FLlKtcxg5fJiSQYAMg1cC0FCGkc5-mXGC5-jW-ZE6DVoDoVGWRjpC50RZBKP2cXu7jp0nxsfe9uU0fm6ptZ3m2hBgsEMjTZj9PxPtOo2oR2_s4BaoBKop4O4S7nQxRj8yq5D2VDYWuB2kmu_5dpJ7rhSdpI7UmZHDWXtt_9B7OL1dfHDpju2in0XftmKGj8qHbpAMX5jyt4IYfALXkOOrA</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Blanchard, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Eberle, W. David</creator><general>American Water Works Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems</title><author>Blanchard, Christopher S. ; Eberle, W. David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Capacity Development</topic><topic>Community capacity building</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Emergency management</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>financial capacity</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Potable water</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>small systems</topic><topic>Small Water Systems</topic><topic>Survey design</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><topic>Technical support</topic><topic>Washington</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blanchard, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberle, W. David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blanchard, Christopher S.</au><au>Eberle, W. David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>E229</spage><epage>E235</epage><pages>E229-E235</pages><issn>0003-150X</issn><eissn>1551-8833</eissn><coden>JAWWA5</coden><abstract>In 2009, legislators asked the Washington State Department of Health's Office of Drinking Water (ODW) why small systems were coming to the legislature to resolve water system emergencies. The ODW already had a number of tools to reduce emergency requests, including a sanitary survey, certification training, workshops, one-on-one technical support, and the financial analysis conducted as part of a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan application. But because existing prioritization and needs-identification schemas are based solely on systems' compliance records, the ODW needed an additional tool to quantify technical, managerial, and financial (TMF) capacity among small systems to more effectively prioritize and direct technical assistance. ODW staff responded by designing a 17-question survey to gauge that capacity. In fall 2011 the ODW conducted the survey of 562 systems, receiving 304 responses. This empirical study reports the results of that survey and supports the contention that the survey results contribute to a better understanding of the small systems in Washington.</abstract><cop>Denver</cop><pub>American Water Works Association</pub><doi>10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-150X |
ispartof | Journal - American Water Works Association, 2013-05, Vol.105 (5), p.E229-E235 |
issn | 0003-150X 1551-8833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419363979 |
source | Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | Capacity Development Community capacity building Compliance Drinking water Emergency management Environmental agencies Federal Legislation Financial analysis financial capacity Financial management Financing Infrastructure Legislatures Polls & surveys Potable water Revenue small systems Small Water Systems Survey design Surveys sustainability Technical support Washington Water management Water utilities |
title | Technical, managerial, and financial capacity among small water systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A33%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technical,%20managerial,%20and%20financial%20capacity%20among%20small%20water%20systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20-%20American%20Water%20Works%20Association&rft.au=Blanchard,%20Christopher%20S.&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=E229&rft.epage=E235&rft.pages=E229-E235&rft.issn=0003-150X&rft.eissn=1551-8833&rft.coden=JAWWA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0045&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3Ejamewatworass.105.5.e229%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3285-7461fc8dba91116710722a249ca83eb60de83cb8aa3e71701d734d94ed76a1643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372352374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=jamewatworass.105.5.e229&rfr_iscdi=true |