Loading…

An assessment of neurocognitive speed in relation to frailty

to evaluate the relationship between neurocognitive speed (NCS) and frailty; to consider how this relationship is affected by how frailty is operationalised. secondary analysis of the baseline cohort of the Oxford Project To Investigate Memory and Aging (OPTIMA), a longitudinal observational cohort....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Age and ageing 2013-03, Vol.42 (2), p.191-196
Main Authors: Rolfson, Darryl B, Wilcock, Gordon, Mitnitski, Arnold, King, Elizabeth, de Jager, Celeste A, Rockwood, Kenneth, Fallah, Nader, Searle, Samuel D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-dc6158b09fa32378395ac73c104746baa9d43e908966255799cbabbb4c41896a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-dc6158b09fa32378395ac73c104746baa9d43e908966255799cbabbb4c41896a3
container_end_page 196
container_issue 2
container_start_page 191
container_title Age and ageing
container_volume 42
creator Rolfson, Darryl B
Wilcock, Gordon
Mitnitski, Arnold
King, Elizabeth
de Jager, Celeste A
Rockwood, Kenneth
Fallah, Nader
Searle, Samuel D
description to evaluate the relationship between neurocognitive speed (NCS) and frailty; to consider how this relationship is affected by how frailty is operationalised. secondary analysis of the baseline cohort of the Oxford Project To Investigate Memory and Aging (OPTIMA), a longitudinal observational cohort. of 388 participants who underwent a comprehensive intake assessment followed by an annual follow-up for at least 3 years, data on all measures were available on 164 people. NCS was defined as a combined score of
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ageing/afs185
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419373262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A343215254</galeid><sourcerecordid>A343215254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-dc6158b09fa32378395ac73c104746baa9d43e908966255799cbabbb4c41896a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9LHDEUB_Aglrq1PXotA168TM3vH-BlWewPELzoOWSyb4bIbLImmaL_vSlrW_DiKbzw4fHe-yJ0RvA3gg27dBOEOF26sRAtjtCKcKl7qhk_RiuMMe2xouYEfSrloZVEEPoRnVBGjSScrNDVOnauFChlB7F2aewiLDn5NMVQw2_oyh5g24XYZZhdDSl2NXVjdmGuz5_Rh9HNBb68vqfo_vv13eZnf3P749dmfdN7Lnntt14SoQdsRscoU5oZ4bxinmCuuBycM1vOwGBtpKRCKGP84IZh4J6T9ufYKbo49N3n9LhAqXYXiod5dhHSUmzbxDDFqKTvUya5kopo_j6l2nClpTaNnr-hD2nJse3cGlImuOFSNtUf1ORmsCH6FCs8VZ_mGSaw7SSbW7tmnFEiqOD_vc-plAyj3eewc_nZEmz_hGsP4dpDuM1_fZ1iGXaw_af_psleABwzndw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1323549466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An assessment of neurocognitive speed in relation to frailty</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Rolfson, Darryl B ; Wilcock, Gordon ; Mitnitski, Arnold ; King, Elizabeth ; de Jager, Celeste A ; Rockwood, Kenneth ; Fallah, Nader ; Searle, Samuel D</creator><creatorcontrib>Rolfson, Darryl B ; Wilcock, Gordon ; Mitnitski, Arnold ; King, Elizabeth ; de Jager, Celeste A ; Rockwood, Kenneth ; Fallah, Nader ; Searle, Samuel D</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[to evaluate the relationship between neurocognitive speed (NCS) and frailty; to consider how this relationship is affected by how frailty is operationalised. secondary analysis of the baseline cohort of the Oxford Project To Investigate Memory and Aging (OPTIMA), a longitudinal observational cohort. of 388 participants who underwent a comprehensive intake assessment followed by an annual follow-up for at least 3 years, data on all measures were available on 164 people. NCS was defined as a combined score of <18 on the pattern comparison test (<11 is abnormal) and letter comparison test (<7 is abnormal). Frailty was defined from a modified Phenotype model, the Edmonton Frailty Scales (EFS) and a frailty index (FI); the latter two were adapted here to exclude cognitive measures. in multivariate logistic (NCS as < or ≥18) and linear regression (NCS as continuous variable), only the FI (OR = 0.87) was significant (P < 0.05). When all frailty measures were included in the multivariate analysis only, FI (OR = 0.88) was significant (P < 0.05). Mini-mental Status Examination remained significantly related to NCS throughout all analysis. NCS slows with increasing frailty as shown with the FI.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afs185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23296141</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ageing ; Aging - psychology ; Assessment ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; England ; Female ; Frail elderly ; Frail Elderly - psychology ; Frailty ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Logistic Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Measurement ; Memory ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Odds Ratio ; Older people ; Phenotypes ; Psychological aspects ; Psychomotor performance ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2013-03, Vol.42 (2), p.191-196</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Mar 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-dc6158b09fa32378395ac73c104746baa9d43e908966255799cbabbb4c41896a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-dc6158b09fa32378395ac73c104746baa9d43e908966255799cbabbb4c41896a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,30997,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23296141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rolfson, Darryl B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitnitski, Arnold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jager, Celeste A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockwood, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallah, Nader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Searle, Samuel D</creatorcontrib><title>An assessment of neurocognitive speed in relation to frailty</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description><![CDATA[to evaluate the relationship between neurocognitive speed (NCS) and frailty; to consider how this relationship is affected by how frailty is operationalised. secondary analysis of the baseline cohort of the Oxford Project To Investigate Memory and Aging (OPTIMA), a longitudinal observational cohort. of 388 participants who underwent a comprehensive intake assessment followed by an annual follow-up for at least 3 years, data on all measures were available on 164 people. NCS was defined as a combined score of <18 on the pattern comparison test (<11 is abnormal) and letter comparison test (<7 is abnormal). Frailty was defined from a modified Phenotype model, the Edmonton Frailty Scales (EFS) and a frailty index (FI); the latter two were adapted here to exclude cognitive measures. in multivariate logistic (NCS as < or ≥18) and linear regression (NCS as continuous variable), only the FI (OR = 0.87) was significant (P < 0.05). When all frailty measures were included in the multivariate analysis only, FI (OR = 0.88) was significant (P < 0.05). Mini-mental Status Examination remained significantly related to NCS throughout all analysis. NCS slows with increasing frailty as shown with the FI.]]></description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ageing</subject><subject>Aging - psychology</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail elderly</subject><subject>Frail Elderly - psychology</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychomotor performance</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9LHDEUB_Aglrq1PXotA168TM3vH-BlWewPELzoOWSyb4bIbLImmaL_vSlrW_DiKbzw4fHe-yJ0RvA3gg27dBOEOF26sRAtjtCKcKl7qhk_RiuMMe2xouYEfSrloZVEEPoRnVBGjSScrNDVOnauFChlB7F2aewiLDn5NMVQw2_oyh5g24XYZZhdDSl2NXVjdmGuz5_Rh9HNBb68vqfo_vv13eZnf3P749dmfdN7Lnntt14SoQdsRscoU5oZ4bxinmCuuBycM1vOwGBtpKRCKGP84IZh4J6T9ufYKbo49N3n9LhAqXYXiod5dhHSUmzbxDDFqKTvUya5kopo_j6l2nClpTaNnr-hD2nJse3cGlImuOFSNtUf1ORmsCH6FCs8VZ_mGSaw7SSbW7tmnFEiqOD_vc-plAyj3eewc_nZEmz_hGsP4dpDuM1_fZ1iGXaw_af_psleABwzndw</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Rolfson, Darryl B</creator><creator>Wilcock, Gordon</creator><creator>Mitnitski, Arnold</creator><creator>King, Elizabeth</creator><creator>de Jager, Celeste A</creator><creator>Rockwood, Kenneth</creator><creator>Fallah, Nader</creator><creator>Searle, Samuel D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>An assessment of neurocognitive speed in relation to frailty</title><author>Rolfson, Darryl B ; Wilcock, Gordon ; Mitnitski, Arnold ; King, Elizabeth ; de Jager, Celeste A ; Rockwood, Kenneth ; Fallah, Nader ; Searle, Samuel D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-dc6158b09fa32378395ac73c104746baa9d43e908966255799cbabbb4c41896a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ageing</topic><topic>Aging - psychology</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail elderly</topic><topic>Frail Elderly - psychology</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychomotor performance</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rolfson, Darryl B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitnitski, Arnold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jager, Celeste A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockwood, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallah, Nader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Searle, Samuel D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rolfson, Darryl B</au><au>Wilcock, Gordon</au><au>Mitnitski, Arnold</au><au>King, Elizabeth</au><au>de Jager, Celeste A</au><au>Rockwood, Kenneth</au><au>Fallah, Nader</au><au>Searle, Samuel D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An assessment of neurocognitive speed in relation to frailty</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>191-196</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><coden>AANGAH</coden><abstract><![CDATA[to evaluate the relationship between neurocognitive speed (NCS) and frailty; to consider how this relationship is affected by how frailty is operationalised. secondary analysis of the baseline cohort of the Oxford Project To Investigate Memory and Aging (OPTIMA), a longitudinal observational cohort. of 388 participants who underwent a comprehensive intake assessment followed by an annual follow-up for at least 3 years, data on all measures were available on 164 people. NCS was defined as a combined score of <18 on the pattern comparison test (<11 is abnormal) and letter comparison test (<7 is abnormal). Frailty was defined from a modified Phenotype model, the Edmonton Frailty Scales (EFS) and a frailty index (FI); the latter two were adapted here to exclude cognitive measures. in multivariate logistic (NCS as < or ≥18) and linear regression (NCS as continuous variable), only the FI (OR = 0.87) was significant (P < 0.05). When all frailty measures were included in the multivariate analysis only, FI (OR = 0.88) was significant (P < 0.05). Mini-mental Status Examination remained significantly related to NCS throughout all analysis. NCS slows with increasing frailty as shown with the FI.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>23296141</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afs185</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0729
ispartof Age and ageing, 2013-03, Vol.42 (2), p.191-196
issn 0002-0729
1468-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1419373262
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford Journals Online
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ageing
Aging - psychology
Assessment
Cognition
Cognitive ability
England
Female
Frail elderly
Frail Elderly - psychology
Frailty
Geriatric Assessment - methods
Health aspects
Humans
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Measurement
Memory
Multivariate Analysis
Neuropsychological Tests
Odds Ratio
Older people
Phenotypes
Psychological aspects
Psychomotor performance
Time Factors
title An assessment of neurocognitive speed in relation to frailty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T16%3A54%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20assessment%20of%20neurocognitive%20speed%20in%20relation%20to%20frailty&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Rolfson,%20Darryl%20B&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=191-196&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft.coden=AANGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afs185&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA343215254%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-dc6158b09fa32378395ac73c104746baa9d43e908966255799cbabbb4c41896a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1323549466&rft_id=info:pmid/23296141&rft_galeid=A343215254&rfr_iscdi=true