Loading…
Foraging Decisions, Patch Use, and Seasonality in Egrets (Aves: Ciconiiformes)
Feeding Snowy (Egretta thula) and Great (Casmerodius albus) egrets were observed during two breeding seasons in coastal New Jersey and two brief winter periods in northeast Florida. A number of tests based on assumptions of foraging models, predictions from foraging theory, and earlier empirical tes...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology (Durham) 1985-06, Vol.66 (3), p.837-844 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-664f21335681246b5a4090aeac15a2fb7e1d04cb718af21ae7ce008710dfffd43 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 844 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 837 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Erwin, R. Michael |
description | Feeding Snowy (Egretta thula) and Great (Casmerodius albus) egrets were observed during two breeding seasons in coastal New Jersey and two brief winter periods in northeast Florida. A number of tests based on assumptions of foraging models, predictions from foraging theory, and earlier empirical tests concerning time allocation and movement in foraging patches was made. Few of the expectations based on foraging theory and/or assumptions were supported by the empirical evidence. Snowy Egrets fed with greater intensity and efficiency during the breeding season (when young were being fed) than during winter. They also showed some tendency to leave patches when their capture rate declined, and they spent more time foraging in patches when other birds were present nearby. Great Egrets, in Contrast, showed few of these tendencies, although they did leave patches when their intercapture intervals increased. Satiation differences had some influence on feeding rates in Snowy Egrets, but only at the end of feeding bouts. Some individuals of both species revisited areas in patches that had recently been exploited, and success rates were usually higher after the second visit. Apparently, for predators of active prey, short-term changes in resource availability ("resource depression") may be more important than resource depletion, a common assumption in most OFT models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1940545 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14254203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1940545</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1940545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-664f21335681246b5a4090aeac15a2fb7e1d04cb718af21ae7ce008710dfffd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1rGzEQBmBRUqjjlv4FQUraQLbV10qr3oLjtAXTFtocelrGsuTIrFeOZt3ifx8FmxQCnstcHl5mXkLecvZRSGY-catYreoXZMSttJXlhp2QEWNcVFbXzStyirhiZbhqRuT7TcqwjP2SXnsXMaYeL-lPGNwdvUV_SaFf0F8eMPXQxWFHY0-ny-wHpB-u_nr8TCfRpT7GkPLa48Vr8jJAh_7NYY_J7c309-RrNfvx5dvkalY52UhTaa2C4FLWuuFC6XkNilkGHhyvQYS58XzBlJsb3kCB4I3zjDWGs0UIYaHkmJzvczc53W89Du06ovNdB71PW2y5ErUSTBZ49gyu0jaXZ4oRVithjLRFvd8rlxNi9qHd5LiGvGs5ax9bbQ-tFvnukAfooAsZ-lLbE7dCc1Y-GxOxZ_9i53fH0trp5A-3Ta31Yyv_s1c4pHz0hAevQoz7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1296427739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foraging Decisions, Patch Use, and Seasonality in Egrets (Aves: Ciconiiformes)</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals (Backfile Content)</source><creator>Erwin, R. Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Erwin, R. Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Feeding Snowy (Egretta thula) and Great (Casmerodius albus) egrets were observed during two breeding seasons in coastal New Jersey and two brief winter periods in northeast Florida. A number of tests based on assumptions of foraging models, predictions from foraging theory, and earlier empirical tests concerning time allocation and movement in foraging patches was made. Few of the expectations based on foraging theory and/or assumptions were supported by the empirical evidence. Snowy Egrets fed with greater intensity and efficiency during the breeding season (when young were being fed) than during winter. They also showed some tendency to leave patches when their capture rate declined, and they spent more time foraging in patches when other birds were present nearby. Great Egrets, in Contrast, showed few of these tendencies, although they did leave patches when their intercapture intervals increased. Satiation differences had some influence on feeding rates in Snowy Egrets, but only at the end of feeding bouts. Some individuals of both species revisited areas in patches that had recently been exploited, and success rates were usually higher after the second visit. Apparently, for predators of active prey, short-term changes in resource availability ("resource depression") may be more important than resource depletion, a common assumption in most OFT models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1940545</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: The Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Brackish ; Coastal ecology ; Ecology ; Egretta alba ; Egretta thula ; Fish ; Foraging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Marine ; Predators ; Wildlife ecology ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1985-06, Vol.66 (3), p.837-844</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1985 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-664f21335681246b5a4090aeac15a2fb7e1d04cb718af21ae7ce008710dfffd43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1940545$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1940545$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27924,27925,46049,46473,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9261021$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erwin, R. Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Foraging Decisions, Patch Use, and Seasonality in Egrets (Aves: Ciconiiformes)</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Feeding Snowy (Egretta thula) and Great (Casmerodius albus) egrets were observed during two breeding seasons in coastal New Jersey and two brief winter periods in northeast Florida. A number of tests based on assumptions of foraging models, predictions from foraging theory, and earlier empirical tests concerning time allocation and movement in foraging patches was made. Few of the expectations based on foraging theory and/or assumptions were supported by the empirical evidence. Snowy Egrets fed with greater intensity and efficiency during the breeding season (when young were being fed) than during winter. They also showed some tendency to leave patches when their capture rate declined, and they spent more time foraging in patches when other birds were present nearby. Great Egrets, in Contrast, showed few of these tendencies, although they did leave patches when their intercapture intervals increased. Satiation differences had some influence on feeding rates in Snowy Egrets, but only at the end of feeding bouts. Some individuals of both species revisited areas in patches that had recently been exploited, and success rates were usually higher after the second visit. Apparently, for predators of active prey, short-term changes in resource availability ("resource depression") may be more important than resource depletion, a common assumption in most OFT models.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Coastal ecology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Egretta alba</subject><subject>Egretta thula</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1rGzEQBmBRUqjjlv4FQUraQLbV10qr3oLjtAXTFtocelrGsuTIrFeOZt3ifx8FmxQCnstcHl5mXkLecvZRSGY-catYreoXZMSttJXlhp2QEWNcVFbXzStyirhiZbhqRuT7TcqwjP2SXnsXMaYeL-lPGNwdvUV_SaFf0F8eMPXQxWFHY0-ny-wHpB-u_nr8TCfRpT7GkPLa48Vr8jJAh_7NYY_J7c309-RrNfvx5dvkalY52UhTaa2C4FLWuuFC6XkNilkGHhyvQYS58XzBlJsb3kCB4I3zjDWGs0UIYaHkmJzvczc53W89Du06ovNdB71PW2y5ErUSTBZ49gyu0jaXZ4oRVithjLRFvd8rlxNi9qHd5LiGvGs5ax9bbQ-tFvnukAfooAsZ-lLbE7dCc1Y-GxOxZ_9i53fH0trp5A-3Ta31Yyv_s1c4pHz0hAevQoz7</recordid><startdate>198506</startdate><enddate>198506</enddate><creator>Erwin, R. Michael</creator><general>The Ecological Society of America</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198506</creationdate><title>Foraging Decisions, Patch Use, and Seasonality in Egrets (Aves: Ciconiiformes)</title><author>Erwin, R. Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-664f21335681246b5a4090aeac15a2fb7e1d04cb718af21ae7ce008710dfffd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Coastal ecology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Egretta alba</topic><topic>Egretta thula</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erwin, R. Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erwin, R. Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foraging Decisions, Patch Use, and Seasonality in Egrets (Aves: Ciconiiformes)</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1985-06</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>837-844</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Feeding Snowy (Egretta thula) and Great (Casmerodius albus) egrets were observed during two breeding seasons in coastal New Jersey and two brief winter periods in northeast Florida. A number of tests based on assumptions of foraging models, predictions from foraging theory, and earlier empirical tests concerning time allocation and movement in foraging patches was made. Few of the expectations based on foraging theory and/or assumptions were supported by the empirical evidence. Snowy Egrets fed with greater intensity and efficiency during the breeding season (when young were being fed) than during winter. They also showed some tendency to leave patches when their capture rate declined, and they spent more time foraging in patches when other birds were present nearby. Great Egrets, in Contrast, showed few of these tendencies, although they did leave patches when their intercapture intervals increased. Satiation differences had some influence on feeding rates in Snowy Egrets, but only at the end of feeding bouts. Some individuals of both species revisited areas in patches that had recently been exploited, and success rates were usually higher after the second visit. Apparently, for predators of active prey, short-term changes in resource availability ("resource depression") may be more important than resource depletion, a common assumption in most OFT models.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>The Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1940545</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 1985-06, Vol.66 (3), p.837-844 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14254203 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Journals (Backfile Content) |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Autoecology Biological and medical sciences Bird nesting Birds Brackish Coastal ecology Ecology Egretta alba Egretta thula Fish Foraging Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Marine Predators Wildlife ecology Winter |
title | Foraging Decisions, Patch Use, and Seasonality in Egrets (Aves: Ciconiiformes) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A12%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foraging%20Decisions,%20Patch%20Use,%20and%20Seasonality%20in%20Egrets%20(Aves:%20Ciconiiformes)&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Erwin,%20R.%20Michael&rft.date=1985-06&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=837-844&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1940545&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1940545%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-664f21335681246b5a4090aeac15a2fb7e1d04cb718af21ae7ce008710dfffd43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1296427739&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1940545&rfr_iscdi=true |