Commentary: New Strategies for Great Lakes Toxicology

The traditional approach to analysis of toxic substances in the Great Lakes has been the employment of analytical chemistry to measure chemical concentrations. Wildlife biology has broadened the analysis by incorporating epidemiological studies of effects on fish and wildlife in these ecosystems. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Great Lakes research 1990-01, Vol.16 (4), p.625-625
Main Authors: Gilbertson, Michael, Fox, Glen A, Henry, Mary, Ludwig, James P
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 625
container_issue 4
container_start_page 625
container_title Journal of Great Lakes research
container_volume 16
creator Gilbertson, Michael
Fox, Glen A
Henry, Mary
Ludwig, James P
description The traditional approach to analysis of toxic substances in the Great Lakes has been the employment of analytical chemistry to measure chemical concentrations. Wildlife biology has broadened the analysis by incorporating epidemiological studies of effects on fish and wildlife in these ecosystems. The variations in approaches between toxicologists and biologists have yielded different results and often conflicting positions about risks. Ultimately, scientific methodology should be used to ensure the accuracy of toxicology studies.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14265569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14265569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_142655693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MLYw0DU0NjbgYOAqLs4yMDA2sTQ35WQwdc7PzU3NK0ksqrRS8EstVwguKUosSU3PTC1WSMsvUnAvSk0sUfBJzAbyQ_IrMpPzc_LTK3kYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Oam2uIs4duQVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcbyhiZGZqamZpTHRCgGCyTd3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14265569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commentary: New Strategies for Great Lakes Toxicology</title><source>Backfile Package - Environmental Science (Legacy) [YES]</source><creator>Gilbertson, Michael ; Fox, Glen A ; Henry, Mary ; Ludwig, James P</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilbertson, Michael ; Fox, Glen A ; Henry, Mary ; Ludwig, James P</creatorcontrib><description>The traditional approach to analysis of toxic substances in the Great Lakes has been the employment of analytical chemistry to measure chemical concentrations. Wildlife biology has broadened the analysis by incorporating epidemiological studies of effects on fish and wildlife in these ecosystems. The variations in approaches between toxicologists and biologists have yielded different results and often conflicting positions about risks. Ultimately, scientific methodology should be used to ensure the accuracy of toxicology studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0380-1330</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of Great Lakes research, 1990-01, Vol.16 (4), p.625-625</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilbertson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Glen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, James P</creatorcontrib><title>Commentary: New Strategies for Great Lakes Toxicology</title><title>Journal of Great Lakes research</title><description>The traditional approach to analysis of toxic substances in the Great Lakes has been the employment of analytical chemistry to measure chemical concentrations. Wildlife biology has broadened the analysis by incorporating epidemiological studies of effects on fish and wildlife in these ecosystems. The variations in approaches between toxicologists and biologists have yielded different results and often conflicting positions about risks. Ultimately, scientific methodology should be used to ensure the accuracy of toxicology studies.</description><issn>0380-1330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0MLYw0DU0NjbgYOAqLs4yMDA2sTQ35WQwdc7PzU3NK0ksqrRS8EstVwguKUosSU3PTC1WSMsvUnAvSk0sUfBJzAbyQ_IrMpPzc_LTK3kYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Oam2uIs4duQVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcbyhiZGZqamZpTHRCgGCyTd3</recordid><startdate>19900101</startdate><enddate>19900101</enddate><creator>Gilbertson, Michael</creator><creator>Fox, Glen A</creator><creator>Henry, Mary</creator><creator>Ludwig, James P</creator><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900101</creationdate><title>Commentary: New Strategies for Great Lakes Toxicology</title><author>Gilbertson, Michael ; Fox, Glen A ; Henry, Mary ; Ludwig, James P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_142655693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbertson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Glen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, James P</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Great Lakes research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbertson, Michael</au><au>Fox, Glen A</au><au>Henry, Mary</au><au>Ludwig, James P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commentary: New Strategies for Great Lakes Toxicology</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Great Lakes research</jtitle><date>1990-01-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>625-625</pages><issn>0380-1330</issn><abstract>The traditional approach to analysis of toxic substances in the Great Lakes has been the employment of analytical chemistry to measure chemical concentrations. Wildlife biology has broadened the analysis by incorporating epidemiological studies of effects on fish and wildlife in these ecosystems. The variations in approaches between toxicologists and biologists have yielded different results and often conflicting positions about risks. Ultimately, scientific methodology should be used to ensure the accuracy of toxicology studies.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0380-1330
ispartof Journal of Great Lakes research, 1990-01, Vol.16 (4), p.625-625
issn 0380-1330
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14265569
source Backfile Package - Environmental Science (Legacy) [YES]
title Commentary: New Strategies for Great Lakes Toxicology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A18%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commentary:%20New%20Strategies%20for%20Great%20Lakes%20Toxicology&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Great%20Lakes%20research&rft.au=Gilbertson,%20Michael&rft.date=1990-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=625-625&rft.issn=0380-1330&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E14265569%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_142655693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14265569&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true