Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Use of the Dominic Interactive: A DSM-Based, Self-Report Screen for School-Aged Children

• Published in: Canadian journal of psychiatry 2013-08, Vol.58 (8), p.466-475
• Main Authors: Bergeron, Lise, Berthiaume, Claude, St-Georges, Marie, Piché, Geneviève, Smolla, Nicole
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Behavior; Biological and medical sciences; Child; Child & adolescent psychiatry; Children & youth; Cognitive ability; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Female; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Mental disorders; Mental Disorders - diagnosis; Methods; Multimedia; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychometrics - instrumentation; Psychometrics - methods; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems; Psychopathology; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Quebec; Reproducibility of Results; Self Report; Sensitivity and Specificity; Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards; Techniques and methods; Validity
• ISSN: 0706-7437; 1497-0015
• DOI: 10.1177/070674371305800805

Objectives: As no single informant can be considered the gold standard of child psychopathology, interviewing of children regarding their own symptoms is necessary. Our study focused on the reliability, validity, and clinical use of the Dominic Interactive (DI), a multimedia self-report screen to assess symptoms for the most frequent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, mental disorders in school-aged children. Methods: A sample of 585 children aged 6 to 11 years from the community and psychiatric clinics was used to analyze the internal consistency, the test-retest estimate of reliability, and the criterion-related validity of the DI against the referral status. In addition, cross-informant correlation coefficients between this instrument (child report) and the Child Symptom Inventory (parent report) were explored in a subsample of 292 participants. Results: For the total sample, Cronbach alpha coefficients ranged from 0.63 to 0.91. Test–retest kappas varied from 0.42 to 0.62 for categories based on cut-off points, except for specific phobias. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.81 for symptom scales. The DI discriminated between referred and nonreferred children in psychiatric clinics for all symptom scales. Significant cross-informant correlation coefficients were higher for the externalizing symptoms (0.35 to 0.48) than the internalizing symptoms (0.14 to 0.27). Conclusions: Findings of our study reasonably support adequate psychometric properties of the DI. This instrument offers a developmentally sensitive screening method to obtain unique information from young children about their mental health problems in front-line services, psychiatric clinics, and research settings.