Loading…

Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology

This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of special education 2013-08, Vol.47 (2), p.108-120
Main Authors: Dickenson, Tammiee S., Gilmore, Joanna A., Price, Karen J., Bennett, Heather L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3
container_end_page 120
container_issue 2
container_start_page 108
container_title The Journal of special education
container_volume 47
creator Dickenson, Tammiee S.
Gilmore, Joanna A.
Price, Karen J.
Bennett, Heather L.
description This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disabilities. The enhancements (e.g., use of visuals, reading support) were intended to improve access to the items for students who had grade-level science content knowledge, but whose disability may impact their ability to answer the items in the original form. Students were asked to think aloud while answering items and answer follow-up questions about specific item-enhancement features. Achievement did not show much improvement but reported cognitive effort suggests reduction in perceived difficulty of enhanced items.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0022466911414720
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430187332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1015181</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0022466911414720</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1430187332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vEzEQhi0EEqFw54JkiQuXLf7adXwMUYGgVBxKz6vperx1tbFb24mUn9F_jJdUCFXiNJaeZ96RZwh5z9k551p_ZkwI1XWGc8WVFuwFWfBWLhulO_WSLGbczPw1eZPzHWOMLzu2II-bcMBc_AjFx0Cjo1eDxzAg3YSHvU9Huim4y9TFRK8z0upAoKupYApQkK5yxpx3GAr9AhntLFxG652v79Vw6_GAf-hVgWAh2VxjfBjpOo7BF39AuoUbeonlNto4xfH4lrxyMGV891TPyPXXi1_r783257fNerVtBtmp0khrW9RiWBpnWm4AobPKGY2KOWaZRiG0dC1I45QB4wQaKUGCkqjtDaA8I59OufcpPuzrDvqdzwNOEwSM-9xzJeuOtJSiqh-fqXdxX_8_zRYXspOdkNViJ2tIMeeErr9Pfgfp2HPWzzfqn9-otnw4tWDyw1_94gdnvOVLXnlz4hlG_Gfo__J-A-fbm3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1412363623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Dickenson, Tammiee S. ; Gilmore, Joanna A. ; Price, Karen J. ; Bennett, Heather L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dickenson, Tammiee S. ; Gilmore, Joanna A. ; Price, Karen J. ; Bennett, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disabilities. The enhancements (e.g., use of visuals, reading support) were intended to improve access to the items for students who had grade-level science content knowledge, but whose disability may impact their ability to answer the items in the original form. Students were asked to think aloud while answering items and answer follow-up questions about specific item-enhancement features. Achievement did not show much improvement but reported cognitive effort suggests reduction in perceived difficulty of enhanced items.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022466911414720</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSPEB9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Alternative Assessment ; Assessment ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Difficulty Level ; Disabilities ; Effect Size ; Grade 10 ; Grade 11 ; High School Students ; High schools ; Incorporation ; Inquiry ; Knowledge ; Methodology ; Oral Reading ; Program Effectiveness ; Protocol Analysis ; Science Achievement ; Scores ; Secondary school students ; South Carolina ; Student Attitudes ; Test Items ; Thinking aloud ; Visual Aids</subject><ispartof>The Journal of special education, 2013-08, Vol.47 (2), p.108-120</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2011</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1015181$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dickenson, Tammiee S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Joanna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology</title><title>The Journal of special education</title><addtitle>J Spec Educ</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disabilities. The enhancements (e.g., use of visuals, reading support) were intended to improve access to the items for students who had grade-level science content knowledge, but whose disability may impact their ability to answer the items in the original form. Students were asked to think aloud while answering items and answer follow-up questions about specific item-enhancement features. Achievement did not show much improvement but reported cognitive effort suggests reduction in perceived difficulty of enhanced items.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Alternative Assessment</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Grade 10</subject><subject>Grade 11</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>High schools</subject><subject>Incorporation</subject><subject>Inquiry</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Protocol Analysis</subject><subject>Science Achievement</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>South Carolina</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Thinking aloud</subject><subject>Visual Aids</subject><issn>0022-4669</issn><issn>1538-4764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vEzEQhi0EEqFw54JkiQuXLf7adXwMUYGgVBxKz6vperx1tbFb24mUn9F_jJdUCFXiNJaeZ96RZwh5z9k551p_ZkwI1XWGc8WVFuwFWfBWLhulO_WSLGbczPw1eZPzHWOMLzu2II-bcMBc_AjFx0Cjo1eDxzAg3YSHvU9Huim4y9TFRK8z0upAoKupYApQkK5yxpx3GAr9AhntLFxG652v79Vw6_GAf-hVgWAh2VxjfBjpOo7BF39AuoUbeonlNto4xfH4lrxyMGV891TPyPXXi1_r783257fNerVtBtmp0khrW9RiWBpnWm4AobPKGY2KOWaZRiG0dC1I45QB4wQaKUGCkqjtDaA8I59OufcpPuzrDvqdzwNOEwSM-9xzJeuOtJSiqh-fqXdxX_8_zRYXspOdkNViJ2tIMeeErr9Pfgfp2HPWzzfqn9-otnw4tWDyw1_94gdnvOVLXnlz4hlG_Gfo__J-A-fbm3o</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Dickenson, Tammiee S.</creator><creator>Gilmore, Joanna A.</creator><creator>Price, Karen J.</creator><creator>Bennett, Heather L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology</title><author>Dickenson, Tammiee S. ; Gilmore, Joanna A. ; Price, Karen J. ; Bennett, Heather L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Alternative Assessment</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Grade 10</topic><topic>Grade 11</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>High schools</topic><topic>Incorporation</topic><topic>Inquiry</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Protocol Analysis</topic><topic>Science Achievement</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>South Carolina</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Thinking aloud</topic><topic>Visual Aids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dickenson, Tammiee S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Joanna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The Journal of special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dickenson, Tammiee S.</au><au>Gilmore, Joanna A.</au><au>Price, Karen J.</au><au>Bennett, Heather L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1015181</ericid><atitle>Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of special education</jtitle><addtitle>J Spec Educ</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>108-120</pages><issn>0022-4669</issn><eissn>1538-4764</eissn><coden>JSPEB9</coden><abstract>This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disabilities. The enhancements (e.g., use of visuals, reading support) were intended to improve access to the items for students who had grade-level science content knowledge, but whose disability may impact their ability to answer the items in the original form. Students were asked to think aloud while answering items and answer follow-up questions about specific item-enhancement features. Achievement did not show much improvement but reported cognitive effort suggests reduction in perceived difficulty of enhanced items.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022466911414720</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4669
ispartof The Journal of special education, 2013-08, Vol.47 (2), p.108-120
issn 0022-4669
1538-4764
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430187332
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ERIC; Sage Journals Online
subjects Academic achievement
Alternative Assessment
Assessment
Cognition & reasoning
Difficulty Level
Disabilities
Effect Size
Grade 10
Grade 11
High School Students
High schools
Incorporation
Inquiry
Knowledge
Methodology
Oral Reading
Program Effectiveness
Protocol Analysis
Science Achievement
Scores
Secondary school students
South Carolina
Student Attitudes
Test Items
Thinking aloud
Visual Aids
title Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A38%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20Science%20Inquiry%20Items%20for%20Use%20on%20an%20Alternate%20Assessment%20Based%20on%20Modified%20Achievement%20Standards%20Using%20Cognitive%20Lab%20Methodology&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20special%20education&rft.au=Dickenson,%20Tammiee%20S.&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=108-120&rft.issn=0022-4669&rft.eissn=1538-4764&rft.coden=JSPEB9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022466911414720&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1430187332%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1412363623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1015181&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022466911414720&rfr_iscdi=true