Loading…
Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology
This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disa...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of special education 2013-08, Vol.47 (2), p.108-120 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3 |
container_end_page | 120 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 108 |
container_title | The Journal of special education |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Dickenson, Tammiee S. Gilmore, Joanna A. Price, Karen J. Bennett, Heather L. |
description | This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disabilities. The enhancements (e.g., use of visuals, reading support) were intended to improve access to the items for students who had grade-level science content knowledge, but whose disability may impact their ability to answer the items in the original form. Students were asked to think aloud while answering items and answer follow-up questions about specific item-enhancement features. Achievement did not show much improvement but reported cognitive effort suggests reduction in perceived difficulty of enhanced items. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022466911414720 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430187332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1015181</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0022466911414720</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1430187332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vEzEQhi0EEqFw54JkiQuXLf7adXwMUYGgVBxKz6vperx1tbFb24mUn9F_jJdUCFXiNJaeZ96RZwh5z9k551p_ZkwI1XWGc8WVFuwFWfBWLhulO_WSLGbczPw1eZPzHWOMLzu2II-bcMBc_AjFx0Cjo1eDxzAg3YSHvU9Huim4y9TFRK8z0upAoKupYApQkK5yxpx3GAr9AhntLFxG652v79Vw6_GAf-hVgWAh2VxjfBjpOo7BF39AuoUbeonlNto4xfH4lrxyMGV891TPyPXXi1_r783257fNerVtBtmp0khrW9RiWBpnWm4AobPKGY2KOWaZRiG0dC1I45QB4wQaKUGCkqjtDaA8I59OufcpPuzrDvqdzwNOEwSM-9xzJeuOtJSiqh-fqXdxX_8_zRYXspOdkNViJ2tIMeeErr9Pfgfp2HPWzzfqn9-otnw4tWDyw1_94gdnvOVLXnlz4hlG_Gfo__J-A-fbm3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1412363623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Dickenson, Tammiee S. ; Gilmore, Joanna A. ; Price, Karen J. ; Bennett, Heather L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dickenson, Tammiee S. ; Gilmore, Joanna A. ; Price, Karen J. ; Bennett, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disabilities. The enhancements (e.g., use of visuals, reading support) were intended to improve access to the items for students who had grade-level science content knowledge, but whose disability may impact their ability to answer the items in the original form. Students were asked to think aloud while answering items and answer follow-up questions about specific item-enhancement features. Achievement did not show much improvement but reported cognitive effort suggests reduction in perceived difficulty of enhanced items.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022466911414720</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSPEB9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Alternative Assessment ; Assessment ; Cognition & reasoning ; Difficulty Level ; Disabilities ; Effect Size ; Grade 10 ; Grade 11 ; High School Students ; High schools ; Incorporation ; Inquiry ; Knowledge ; Methodology ; Oral Reading ; Program Effectiveness ; Protocol Analysis ; Science Achievement ; Scores ; Secondary school students ; South Carolina ; Student Attitudes ; Test Items ; Thinking aloud ; Visual Aids</subject><ispartof>The Journal of special education, 2013-08, Vol.47 (2), p.108-120</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2011</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000,79236</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1015181$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dickenson, Tammiee S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Joanna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology</title><title>The Journal of special education</title><addtitle>J Spec Educ</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disabilities. The enhancements (e.g., use of visuals, reading support) were intended to improve access to the items for students who had grade-level science content knowledge, but whose disability may impact their ability to answer the items in the original form. Students were asked to think aloud while answering items and answer follow-up questions about specific item-enhancement features. Achievement did not show much improvement but reported cognitive effort suggests reduction in perceived difficulty of enhanced items.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Alternative Assessment</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Grade 10</subject><subject>Grade 11</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>High schools</subject><subject>Incorporation</subject><subject>Inquiry</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Protocol Analysis</subject><subject>Science Achievement</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>South Carolina</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Thinking aloud</subject><subject>Visual Aids</subject><issn>0022-4669</issn><issn>1538-4764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vEzEQhi0EEqFw54JkiQuXLf7adXwMUYGgVBxKz6vperx1tbFb24mUn9F_jJdUCFXiNJaeZ96RZwh5z9k551p_ZkwI1XWGc8WVFuwFWfBWLhulO_WSLGbczPw1eZPzHWOMLzu2II-bcMBc_AjFx0Cjo1eDxzAg3YSHvU9Huim4y9TFRK8z0upAoKupYApQkK5yxpx3GAr9AhntLFxG652v79Vw6_GAf-hVgWAh2VxjfBjpOo7BF39AuoUbeonlNto4xfH4lrxyMGV891TPyPXXi1_r783257fNerVtBtmp0khrW9RiWBpnWm4AobPKGY2KOWaZRiG0dC1I45QB4wQaKUGCkqjtDaA8I59OufcpPuzrDvqdzwNOEwSM-9xzJeuOtJSiqh-fqXdxX_8_zRYXspOdkNViJ2tIMeeErr9Pfgfp2HPWzzfqn9-otnw4tWDyw1_94gdnvOVLXnlz4hlG_Gfo__J-A-fbm3o</recordid><startdate>201308</startdate><enddate>201308</enddate><creator>Dickenson, Tammiee S.</creator><creator>Gilmore, Joanna A.</creator><creator>Price, Karen J.</creator><creator>Bennett, Heather L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201308</creationdate><title>Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology</title><author>Dickenson, Tammiee S. ; Gilmore, Joanna A. ; Price, Karen J. ; Bennett, Heather L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Alternative Assessment</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Grade 10</topic><topic>Grade 11</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>High schools</topic><topic>Incorporation</topic><topic>Inquiry</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Protocol Analysis</topic><topic>Science Achievement</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>South Carolina</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Thinking aloud</topic><topic>Visual Aids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dickenson, Tammiee S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Joanna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The Journal of special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dickenson, Tammiee S.</au><au>Gilmore, Joanna A.</au><au>Price, Karen J.</au><au>Bennett, Heather L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1015181</ericid><atitle>Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of special education</jtitle><addtitle>J Spec Educ</addtitle><date>2013-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>108-120</pages><issn>0022-4669</issn><eissn>1538-4764</eissn><coden>JSPEB9</coden><abstract>This study evaluated the benefits of item enhancements applied to science-inquiry items for incorporation into an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards for high school students. Six items were included in the cognitive lab sessions involving both students with and without disabilities. The enhancements (e.g., use of visuals, reading support) were intended to improve access to the items for students who had grade-level science content knowledge, but whose disability may impact their ability to answer the items in the original form. Students were asked to think aloud while answering items and answer follow-up questions about specific item-enhancement features. Achievement did not show much improvement but reported cognitive effort suggests reduction in perceived difficulty of enhanced items.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022466911414720</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4669 |
ispartof | The Journal of special education, 2013-08, Vol.47 (2), p.108-120 |
issn | 0022-4669 1538-4764 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430187332 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ERIC; Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Academic achievement Alternative Assessment Assessment Cognition & reasoning Difficulty Level Disabilities Effect Size Grade 10 Grade 11 High School Students High schools Incorporation Inquiry Knowledge Methodology Oral Reading Program Effectiveness Protocol Analysis Science Achievement Scores Secondary school students South Carolina Student Attitudes Test Items Thinking aloud Visual Aids |
title | Investigation of Science Inquiry Items for Use on an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards Using Cognitive Lab Methodology |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A38%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20Science%20Inquiry%20Items%20for%20Use%20on%20an%20Alternate%20Assessment%20Based%20on%20Modified%20Achievement%20Standards%20Using%20Cognitive%20Lab%20Methodology&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20special%20education&rft.au=Dickenson,%20Tammiee%20S.&rft.date=2013-08&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=108-120&rft.issn=0022-4669&rft.eissn=1538-4764&rft.coden=JSPEB9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022466911414720&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1430187332%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-3dd5e72c89f9519aea6d4f97e40f0d07e2273f5a39f49a9f2e933a3a43e7dbae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1412363623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1015181&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022466911414720&rfr_iscdi=true |