Loading…

Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology

Objective The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend an earlier study carried out in the UK of lay understanding of cancer‐related terms in a Dutch sample, by (i) examining understanding of common terms relating to diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment and (ii) experimentally exploring the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.1186-1191
Main Authors: Pieterse, Arwen H., Jager, Nienke A., Smets, Ellen M.A., Henselmans, Inge
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-f21062fb74bb3320e8f190c84d72972cfe2905ef15e6903849faf8f3c615961e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-f21062fb74bb3320e8f190c84d72972cfe2905ef15e6903849faf8f3c615961e3
container_end_page 1191
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1186
container_title Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)
container_volume 22
creator Pieterse, Arwen H.
Jager, Nienke A.
Smets, Ellen M.A.
Henselmans, Inge
description Objective The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend an earlier study carried out in the UK of lay understanding of cancer‐related terms in a Dutch sample, by (i) examining understanding of common terms relating to diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment and (ii) experimentally exploring the effect of medical jargon versus plain language use on individuals' perceived efficacy in interacting with oncologists, participating in medical decision making, and interpersonal trust. Methods One hundred ninety‐four lay people completed a questionnaire assessing (i) understanding, confidence in understanding, and worry after reading 10 scenarios presenting cancer‐related terms and (ii) perceived communication efficacy, decision‐making efficacy, and trust following a vignette portraying an oncologist using either jargon or plain language. Results On average, participants understood a majority (6.8 ± 1.6) of cancer‐related terms, yet only 2.2% understood all 10 terms correctly. Compared with incorrect understanding, correct understanding was generally related to higher confidence in understanding and to worry levels that better matched the scenarios. Language complexity did not significantly affect measures of perceived efficacy or trust. Overall confidence in understanding was significantly related to measures of perceived efficacy (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pon.3096
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430189131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1349401333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-f21062fb74bb3320e8f190c84d72972cfe2905ef15e6903849faf8f3c615961e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1P3DAQBmALUfGxrcQvQJG4cAnMeBwnVk9lBduKLfTQlqOV9dookNiLvRHsv28WtqhCqsRcPIdHr-R5GTtAOEEAfroI_oRAyS22h6BUjhJxe70XZa64ULtsP6U7gAErucN2OS9KElDssc_TepX1fm5jWtZ-3vjbLLjMhK4LPuvsvDF1my1t7Bof2nC7yhqfBW-e94_sg6vbZD9t3hH7dXH-c_w1n15Pvo2_THMjCpK54wiSu1kpZjMiDrZyqMBUYl5yVXLjLFdQWIeFlQqoEsrVrnJkJBZKoqURO37JXcTw0Nu01F2TjG3b2tvQJ42CACuFhO-gqIhKeA8loQQgDTNiR2_oXeijH_78rBRJ4v8EmhhSitbpRWy6Oq40gl7XpIea9LqmgR5uAvvZcORX-LeXAeQv4LFp7eq_QfrH9dUmcOObtLRPr76O91qWVBb65mqi5fj77zNxc6kF_QGDbqdq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1349936321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Pieterse, Arwen H. ; Jager, Nienke A. ; Smets, Ellen M.A. ; Henselmans, Inge</creator><creatorcontrib>Pieterse, Arwen H. ; Jager, Nienke A. ; Smets, Ellen M.A. ; Henselmans, Inge</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend an earlier study carried out in the UK of lay understanding of cancer‐related terms in a Dutch sample, by (i) examining understanding of common terms relating to diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment and (ii) experimentally exploring the effect of medical jargon versus plain language use on individuals' perceived efficacy in interacting with oncologists, participating in medical decision making, and interpersonal trust. Methods One hundred ninety‐four lay people completed a questionnaire assessing (i) understanding, confidence in understanding, and worry after reading 10 scenarios presenting cancer‐related terms and (ii) perceived communication efficacy, decision‐making efficacy, and trust following a vignette portraying an oncologist using either jargon or plain language. Results On average, participants understood a majority (6.8 ± 1.6) of cancer‐related terms, yet only 2.2% understood all 10 terms correctly. Compared with incorrect understanding, correct understanding was generally related to higher confidence in understanding and to worry levels that better matched the scenarios. Language complexity did not significantly affect measures of perceived efficacy or trust. Overall confidence in understanding was significantly related to measures of perceived efficacy (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion Similar to the earlier UK study these results suggest that lay people's understanding of commonly‐used terms in oncology is suboptimal. Moreover, confidence in understanding was related to perceived efficacy in participating in the consultation. Oncologists should attempt to correct patient misunderstanding to alleviate unnecessary worry and potentially facilitate patient participation. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.3096</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22573405</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POJCEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cancer ; Comprehension ; Consultation ; Decision making ; Efficacy ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; health literacy ; Humans ; Lay people ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical Oncology ; Medical treatment ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Oncologists ; Oncology ; patient participation ; shared decision making ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Terminology as Topic ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.1186-1191</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. May 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-f21062fb74bb3320e8f190c84d72972cfe2905ef15e6903849faf8f3c615961e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-f21062fb74bb3320e8f190c84d72972cfe2905ef15e6903849faf8f3c615961e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22573405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pieterse, Arwen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, Nienke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smets, Ellen M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henselmans, Inge</creatorcontrib><title>Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><description>Objective The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend an earlier study carried out in the UK of lay understanding of cancer‐related terms in a Dutch sample, by (i) examining understanding of common terms relating to diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment and (ii) experimentally exploring the effect of medical jargon versus plain language use on individuals' perceived efficacy in interacting with oncologists, participating in medical decision making, and interpersonal trust. Methods One hundred ninety‐four lay people completed a questionnaire assessing (i) understanding, confidence in understanding, and worry after reading 10 scenarios presenting cancer‐related terms and (ii) perceived communication efficacy, decision‐making efficacy, and trust following a vignette portraying an oncologist using either jargon or plain language. Results On average, participants understood a majority (6.8 ± 1.6) of cancer‐related terms, yet only 2.2% understood all 10 terms correctly. Compared with incorrect understanding, correct understanding was generally related to higher confidence in understanding and to worry levels that better matched the scenarios. Language complexity did not significantly affect measures of perceived efficacy or trust. Overall confidence in understanding was significantly related to measures of perceived efficacy (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion Similar to the earlier UK study these results suggest that lay people's understanding of commonly‐used terms in oncology is suboptimal. Moreover, confidence in understanding was related to perceived efficacy in participating in the consultation. Oncologists should attempt to correct patient misunderstanding to alleviate unnecessary worry and potentially facilitate patient participation. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Consultation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>health literacy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lay people</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical Oncology</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Oncologists</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>patient participation</subject><subject>shared decision making</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1P3DAQBmALUfGxrcQvQJG4cAnMeBwnVk9lBduKLfTQlqOV9dookNiLvRHsv28WtqhCqsRcPIdHr-R5GTtAOEEAfroI_oRAyS22h6BUjhJxe70XZa64ULtsP6U7gAErucN2OS9KElDssc_TepX1fm5jWtZ-3vjbLLjMhK4LPuvsvDF1my1t7Bof2nC7yhqfBW-e94_sg6vbZD9t3hH7dXH-c_w1n15Pvo2_THMjCpK54wiSu1kpZjMiDrZyqMBUYl5yVXLjLFdQWIeFlQqoEsrVrnJkJBZKoqURO37JXcTw0Nu01F2TjG3b2tvQJ42CACuFhO-gqIhKeA8loQQgDTNiR2_oXeijH_78rBRJ4v8EmhhSitbpRWy6Oq40gl7XpIea9LqmgR5uAvvZcORX-LeXAeQv4LFp7eq_QfrH9dUmcOObtLRPr76O91qWVBb65mqi5fj77zNxc6kF_QGDbqdq</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Pieterse, Arwen H.</creator><creator>Jager, Nienke A.</creator><creator>Smets, Ellen M.A.</creator><creator>Henselmans, Inge</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology</title><author>Pieterse, Arwen H. ; Jager, Nienke A. ; Smets, Ellen M.A. ; Henselmans, Inge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-f21062fb74bb3320e8f190c84d72972cfe2905ef15e6903849faf8f3c615961e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Consultation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>health literacy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lay people</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical Oncology</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Oncologists</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>patient participation</topic><topic>shared decision making</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pieterse, Arwen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, Nienke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smets, Ellen M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henselmans, Inge</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pieterse, Arwen H.</au><au>Jager, Nienke A.</au><au>Smets, Ellen M.A.</au><au>Henselmans, Inge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1186</spage><epage>1191</epage><pages>1186-1191</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><coden>POJCEE</coden><abstract>Objective The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend an earlier study carried out in the UK of lay understanding of cancer‐related terms in a Dutch sample, by (i) examining understanding of common terms relating to diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment and (ii) experimentally exploring the effect of medical jargon versus plain language use on individuals' perceived efficacy in interacting with oncologists, participating in medical decision making, and interpersonal trust. Methods One hundred ninety‐four lay people completed a questionnaire assessing (i) understanding, confidence in understanding, and worry after reading 10 scenarios presenting cancer‐related terms and (ii) perceived communication efficacy, decision‐making efficacy, and trust following a vignette portraying an oncologist using either jargon or plain language. Results On average, participants understood a majority (6.8 ± 1.6) of cancer‐related terms, yet only 2.2% understood all 10 terms correctly. Compared with incorrect understanding, correct understanding was generally related to higher confidence in understanding and to worry levels that better matched the scenarios. Language complexity did not significantly affect measures of perceived efficacy or trust. Overall confidence in understanding was significantly related to measures of perceived efficacy (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion Similar to the earlier UK study these results suggest that lay people's understanding of commonly‐used terms in oncology is suboptimal. Moreover, confidence in understanding was related to perceived efficacy in participating in the consultation. Oncologists should attempt to correct patient misunderstanding to alleviate unnecessary worry and potentially facilitate patient participation. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22573405</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.3096</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9249
ispartof Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2013-05, Vol.22 (5), p.1186-1191
issn 1057-9249
1099-1611
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430189131
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Cancer
Comprehension
Consultation
Decision making
Efficacy
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
health literacy
Humans
Lay people
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medical Oncology
Medical treatment
Neoplasms - psychology
Netherlands - epidemiology
Oncologists
Oncology
patient participation
shared decision making
Surveys and Questionnaires
Terminology as Topic
Trust
title Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A49%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lay%20understanding%20of%20common%20medical%20terminology%20in%20oncology&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Pieterse,%20Arwen%20H.&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1186&rft.epage=1191&rft.pages=1186-1191&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.coden=POJCEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.3096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1349401333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-f21062fb74bb3320e8f190c84d72972cfe2905ef15e6903849faf8f3c615961e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1349936321&rft_id=info:pmid/22573405&rfr_iscdi=true