Sexual Reorientation Therapy Interventions: Perspectives of Ex-Ex-Gay Individuals

While the topic of sexual reorientation therapy, that is, therapy intended to change one's sexual orientation from lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) to heterosexual, is not a new one, there is renewed interest in reorientation therapy. While most of the debate surrounding this controversial pract...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gay & lesbian mental health 2013-07, Vol.17 (3), p.256-277
Main Authors: Flentje, Annesa, Heck, Nicholas C., Cochran, Bryan N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
conversion therapy
ethical
ex-ex-gay
ex-gay
Identity
Interventions
Lesbians
mental health
reorientation therapy
Sexual orientation
Treatment methods
Validation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While the topic of sexual reorientation therapy, that is, therapy intended to change one's sexual orientation from lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) to heterosexual, is not a new one, there is renewed interest in reorientation therapy. While most of the debate surrounding this controversial practice has focused on whether or not it should be banned, relatively few studies exist that detail what the process of reorientation therapy entails. The purpose of this investigation was to find out more about the typical modalities and interventions of reorientation therapy. Participants were 38 individuals who had gone through at least one episode of reorientation therapy and later reclaimed a LGB identity (113 total episodes). Participants' open-ended responses to questions about their therapy experiences were coded into broader themes, and participants selected from a list of possible treatment methods that were used in their most recent intervention experience. Results indicated that frequently used reorientation interventions had a strong emphasis on religious practices, often included negative messages about LGB individuals, and had a greater emphasis on change than on validation techniques. Some participants recounted practices that are inconsistent with the ethical guidelines for mental health professionals. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
ISSN:1935-9705
1935-9713
DOI:10.1080/19359705.2013.773268