Loading…

Evaluation of VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Variety of Foods and Environmental Samples: Collaborative Study

The VIDAS UP Salmonella (SPT) uses recombinant phage proteins to detect Salmonella species in human and animal food products and production environmental samples after 18-26 h of enrichment. The VIDAS SPT assay is performed with the automated VIDAS or mini-VIDAS instruments. The VIDAS SPT method was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of AOAC International 2013-07, Vol.96 (4), p.808-821
Main Authors: BIRD, Patrick, FISHER, Kiel, GOINS, David, JOHNSON, Ronald L, BOYLE, Megan, HUFFMAN, Travis, JUENGER, Marc, BENZINGER, M. Joseph, BEDINGHAUS, Paige, FLANNERY, Jonathan, CROWLEY, Erin, AGIN, James
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-52bc89abd5b7403d2fa9dc69906efa9d0f39982111ac450e727b4f9d3be2fce13
cites
container_end_page 821
container_issue 4
container_start_page 808
container_title Journal of AOAC International
container_volume 96
creator BIRD, Patrick
FISHER, Kiel
GOINS, David
JOHNSON, Ronald L
BOYLE, Megan
HUFFMAN, Travis
JUENGER, Marc
BENZINGER, M. Joseph
BEDINGHAUS, Paige
FLANNERY, Jonathan
CROWLEY, Erin
AGIN, James
description The VIDAS UP Salmonella (SPT) uses recombinant phage proteins to detect Salmonella species in human and animal food products and production environmental samples after 18-26 h of enrichment. The VIDAS SPT assay is performed with the automated VIDAS or mini-VIDAS instruments. The VIDAS SPT method was compared in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) 4.05 (2011) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products reference method following the current AOAC guidelines. A total of 15 laboratories representing government, academia, and industry throughout the United States participated. One matrix, raw ground beef, was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 375 g. Each test portion was artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels, an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFUltest portion), and a high inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). In this study, 1656 unpaired replicate samples were analyzed. Of those unpaired replicates, 476 were presumptive positive by the VIDAS method, with 475 confirmed positive by the traditional confirmation procedures and 476 confirmed positive by an alternative confirmation procedure. There were 411 confirmed positive replicates by the USDA/FSIS-MLG reference method. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD). For the low-level 375 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.01 (-0.12, +0.15) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation; 0.02 (-0.18, +0.2) for samples confirmed following traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP; and 0.03 (-0.18, +0.24) for samples confirmed following the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. For the low-level 25 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.41, (0.32, +0.49) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation, the traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP, and the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. With 0.0 within the confidence intervals for the 375 g test portions, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the VIDAS SPT method and the USDA/FSIS-MLG method at the 0.05 level. For the 25 g test portions,
doi_str_mv 10.5740/jaoacint.CS2013_01
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430398166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A370395876</galeid><sourcerecordid>A370395876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-52bc89abd5b7403d2fa9dc69906efa9d0f39982111ac450e727b4f9d3be2fce13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd9qFDEUhwdRbK2-gBcSEKFezJo_M5OJd8t2q4WChWl7O5zJJJoyk6xJZmHfw-fwIXwyM-xuVZBcJCTfl5ycX5a9JnhR8gJ_eAAH0ti4WDUUE9Zi8iQ7JaIoci4ofZrWuMI5o5ycZC9CeMC4IBWmz7MTWmCMeclPsx_rLQwTROMschrdX10sm18_0d0NamAYnVXDAOi8ubl9j5YhwA5p51H8ptCFikoetb9YYxGge_BGxd18dOlcHxDYHq3t1nhnR2UjDEkZN4MKH9HKJa1zPtWwVaiJU797mT3TMAT16jCfZXeX69vV5_z6y6er1fI6lyVmMS9pJ2sBXV92qR2spxpELyshcKXmJdZMiJoSQkAWJVac8q7Qomedoloqws6y8_29G---TyrEdjRBzt-wyk2hJQXDTNSkqhL6do9-hUG1xmoXPcgZb5eMJ6qs-Uwt_kOl0avRyNQhbdL-PwLdC9K7ELzS7cabEfyuJbidQ26PIbePISfpzaHsqRtV_6gcU03AuwMAQcKgPVhpwh8uPVwXXLDf_oqyBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1430398166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Variety of Foods and Environmental Samples: Collaborative Study</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>BIRD, Patrick ; FISHER, Kiel ; GOINS, David ; JOHNSON, Ronald L ; BOYLE, Megan ; HUFFMAN, Travis ; JUENGER, Marc ; BENZINGER, M. Joseph ; BEDINGHAUS, Paige ; FLANNERY, Jonathan ; CROWLEY, Erin ; AGIN, James</creator><creatorcontrib>BIRD, Patrick ; FISHER, Kiel ; GOINS, David ; JOHNSON, Ronald L ; BOYLE, Megan ; HUFFMAN, Travis ; JUENGER, Marc ; BENZINGER, M. Joseph ; BEDINGHAUS, Paige ; FLANNERY, Jonathan ; CROWLEY, Erin ; AGIN, James ; Collaborators</creatorcontrib><description>The VIDAS UP Salmonella (SPT) uses recombinant phage proteins to detect Salmonella species in human and animal food products and production environmental samples after 18-26 h of enrichment. The VIDAS SPT assay is performed with the automated VIDAS or mini-VIDAS instruments. The VIDAS SPT method was compared in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) 4.05 (2011) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products reference method following the current AOAC guidelines. A total of 15 laboratories representing government, academia, and industry throughout the United States participated. One matrix, raw ground beef, was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 375 g. Each test portion was artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels, an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFUltest portion), and a high inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). In this study, 1656 unpaired replicate samples were analyzed. Of those unpaired replicates, 476 were presumptive positive by the VIDAS method, with 475 confirmed positive by the traditional confirmation procedures and 476 confirmed positive by an alternative confirmation procedure. There were 411 confirmed positive replicates by the USDA/FSIS-MLG reference method. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD). For the low-level 375 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.01 (-0.12, +0.15) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation; 0.02 (-0.18, +0.2) for samples confirmed following traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP; and 0.03 (-0.18, +0.24) for samples confirmed following the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. For the low-level 25 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.41, (0.32, +0.49) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation, the traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP, and the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. With 0.0 within the confidence intervals for the 375 g test portions, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the VIDAS SPT method and the USDA/FSIS-MLG method at the 0.05 level. For the 25 g test portions, a statistically significant difference was observed between the VIDAS SPT method and the reference method for the low inoculum level, where the VIDAS SPT method recovered a higher number of positive results than the reference method. It is recommended that the VIDAS SPT method with the optional ASAP and IBISA agar confirmation method be adopted for Official First Action status for the detection of Salmonella in a variety of foods and environmental samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1060-3271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.CS2013_01</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24000757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Comparative analysis ; Cooperative Behavior ; Environmental Microbiology ; Food industries ; Food Microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Meat - microbiology ; Probability ; Salmonella ; Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification ; Salmonella food poisoning</subject><ispartof>Journal of AOAC International, 2013-07, Vol.96 (4), p.808-821</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-52bc89abd5b7403d2fa9dc69906efa9d0f39982111ac450e727b4f9d3be2fce13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27638479$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24000757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BIRD, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHER, Kiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOINS, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOYLE, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUFFMAN, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUENGER, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BENZINGER, M. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEDINGHAUS, Paige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLANNERY, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CROWLEY, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AGIN, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collaborators</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Variety of Foods and Environmental Samples: Collaborative Study</title><title>Journal of AOAC International</title><addtitle>J AOAC Int</addtitle><description>The VIDAS UP Salmonella (SPT) uses recombinant phage proteins to detect Salmonella species in human and animal food products and production environmental samples after 18-26 h of enrichment. The VIDAS SPT assay is performed with the automated VIDAS or mini-VIDAS instruments. The VIDAS SPT method was compared in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) 4.05 (2011) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products reference method following the current AOAC guidelines. A total of 15 laboratories representing government, academia, and industry throughout the United States participated. One matrix, raw ground beef, was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 375 g. Each test portion was artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels, an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFUltest portion), and a high inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). In this study, 1656 unpaired replicate samples were analyzed. Of those unpaired replicates, 476 were presumptive positive by the VIDAS method, with 475 confirmed positive by the traditional confirmation procedures and 476 confirmed positive by an alternative confirmation procedure. There were 411 confirmed positive replicates by the USDA/FSIS-MLG reference method. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD). For the low-level 375 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.01 (-0.12, +0.15) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation; 0.02 (-0.18, +0.2) for samples confirmed following traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP; and 0.03 (-0.18, +0.24) for samples confirmed following the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. For the low-level 25 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.41, (0.32, +0.49) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation, the traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP, and the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. With 0.0 within the confidence intervals for the 375 g test portions, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the VIDAS SPT method and the USDA/FSIS-MLG method at the 0.05 level. For the 25 g test portions, a statistically significant difference was observed between the VIDAS SPT method and the reference method for the low inoculum level, where the VIDAS SPT method recovered a higher number of positive results than the reference method. It is recommended that the VIDAS SPT method with the optional ASAP and IBISA agar confirmation method be adopted for Official First Action status for the detection of Salmonella in a variety of foods and environmental samples.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Environmental Microbiology</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Salmonella food poisoning</subject><issn>1060-3271</issn><issn>1944-7922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkd9qFDEUhwdRbK2-gBcSEKFezJo_M5OJd8t2q4WChWl7O5zJJJoyk6xJZmHfw-fwIXwyM-xuVZBcJCTfl5ycX5a9JnhR8gJ_eAAH0ti4WDUUE9Zi8iQ7JaIoci4ofZrWuMI5o5ycZC9CeMC4IBWmz7MTWmCMeclPsx_rLQwTROMschrdX10sm18_0d0NamAYnVXDAOi8ubl9j5YhwA5p51H8ptCFikoetb9YYxGge_BGxd18dOlcHxDYHq3t1nhnR2UjDEkZN4MKH9HKJa1zPtWwVaiJU797mT3TMAT16jCfZXeX69vV5_z6y6er1fI6lyVmMS9pJ2sBXV92qR2spxpELyshcKXmJdZMiJoSQkAWJVac8q7Qomedoloqws6y8_29G---TyrEdjRBzt-wyk2hJQXDTNSkqhL6do9-hUG1xmoXPcgZb5eMJ6qs-Uwt_kOl0avRyNQhbdL-PwLdC9K7ELzS7cabEfyuJbidQ26PIbePISfpzaHsqRtV_6gcU03AuwMAQcKgPVhpwh8uPVwXXLDf_oqyBQ</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>BIRD, Patrick</creator><creator>FISHER, Kiel</creator><creator>GOINS, David</creator><creator>JOHNSON, Ronald L</creator><creator>BOYLE, Megan</creator><creator>HUFFMAN, Travis</creator><creator>JUENGER, Marc</creator><creator>BENZINGER, M. Joseph</creator><creator>BEDINGHAUS, Paige</creator><creator>FLANNERY, Jonathan</creator><creator>CROWLEY, Erin</creator><creator>AGIN, James</creator><general>AOAC International</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Variety of Foods and Environmental Samples: Collaborative Study</title><author>BIRD, Patrick ; FISHER, Kiel ; GOINS, David ; JOHNSON, Ronald L ; BOYLE, Megan ; HUFFMAN, Travis ; JUENGER, Marc ; BENZINGER, M. Joseph ; BEDINGHAUS, Paige ; FLANNERY, Jonathan ; CROWLEY, Erin ; AGIN, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-52bc89abd5b7403d2fa9dc69906efa9d0f39982111ac450e727b4f9d3be2fce13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Environmental Microbiology</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Salmonella food poisoning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BIRD, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHER, Kiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOINS, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOYLE, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUFFMAN, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUENGER, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BENZINGER, M. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BEDINGHAUS, Paige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLANNERY, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CROWLEY, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AGIN, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collaborators</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of AOAC International</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BIRD, Patrick</au><au>FISHER, Kiel</au><au>GOINS, David</au><au>JOHNSON, Ronald L</au><au>BOYLE, Megan</au><au>HUFFMAN, Travis</au><au>JUENGER, Marc</au><au>BENZINGER, M. Joseph</au><au>BEDINGHAUS, Paige</au><au>FLANNERY, Jonathan</au><au>CROWLEY, Erin</au><au>AGIN, James</au><aucorp>Collaborators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Variety of Foods and Environmental Samples: Collaborative Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of AOAC International</jtitle><addtitle>J AOAC Int</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>808</spage><epage>821</epage><pages>808-821</pages><issn>1060-3271</issn><eissn>1944-7922</eissn><abstract>The VIDAS UP Salmonella (SPT) uses recombinant phage proteins to detect Salmonella species in human and animal food products and production environmental samples after 18-26 h of enrichment. The VIDAS SPT assay is performed with the automated VIDAS or mini-VIDAS instruments. The VIDAS SPT method was compared in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) 4.05 (2011) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products reference method following the current AOAC guidelines. A total of 15 laboratories representing government, academia, and industry throughout the United States participated. One matrix, raw ground beef, was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 375 g. Each test portion was artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels, an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2-2 CFUltest portion), and a high inoculum level (2-5 CFU/test portion). In this study, 1656 unpaired replicate samples were analyzed. Of those unpaired replicates, 476 were presumptive positive by the VIDAS method, with 475 confirmed positive by the traditional confirmation procedures and 476 confirmed positive by an alternative confirmation procedure. There were 411 confirmed positive replicates by the USDA/FSIS-MLG reference method. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD). For the low-level 375 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.01 (-0.12, +0.15) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation; 0.02 (-0.18, +0.2) for samples confirmed following traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP; and 0.03 (-0.18, +0.24) for samples confirmed following the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. For the low-level 25 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.41, (0.32, +0.49) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation, the traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP, and the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. With 0.0 within the confidence intervals for the 375 g test portions, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the VIDAS SPT method and the USDA/FSIS-MLG method at the 0.05 level. For the 25 g test portions, a statistically significant difference was observed between the VIDAS SPT method and the reference method for the low inoculum level, where the VIDAS SPT method recovered a higher number of positive results than the reference method. It is recommended that the VIDAS SPT method with the optional ASAP and IBISA agar confirmation method be adopted for Official First Action status for the detection of Salmonella in a variety of foods and environmental samples.</abstract><cop>Gaithersburg, MD</cop><pub>AOAC International</pub><pmid>24000757</pmid><doi>10.5740/jaoacint.CS2013_01</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1060-3271
ispartof Journal of AOAC International, 2013-07, Vol.96 (4), p.808-821
issn 1060-3271
1944-7922
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1430398166
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Analysis
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle
Comparative analysis
Cooperative Behavior
Environmental Microbiology
Food industries
Food Microbiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Meat - microbiology
Probability
Salmonella
Salmonella - isolation & purification
Salmonella food poisoning
title Evaluation of VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Variety of Foods and Environmental Samples: Collaborative Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A21%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20VIDAS%C2%AE%20UP%20Salmonella%20(SPT)%20Assay%20for%20the%20Detection%20of%20Salmonella%20in%20a%20Variety%20of%20Foods%20and%20Environmental%20Samples:%20Collaborative%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20AOAC%20International&rft.au=BIRD,%20Patrick&rft.aucorp=Collaborators&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=808&rft.epage=821&rft.pages=808-821&rft.issn=1060-3271&rft.eissn=1944-7922&rft_id=info:doi/10.5740/jaoacint.CS2013_01&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA370395876%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-52bc89abd5b7403d2fa9dc69906efa9d0f39982111ac450e727b4f9d3be2fce13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1430398166&rft_id=info:pmid/24000757&rft_galeid=A370395876&rfr_iscdi=true