Loading…
Plasma-free vs deconjugated metanephrines for diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma
Summary Background The diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma is commonly performed by the measurements of plasma‐free normetanephrine and metanephrine. Plasma‐deconjugated normetanephrine and metanephrine have been proposed as alternative, equivalent, but easier to measure biomarkers. Objective The aim of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) 2013-10, Vol.79 (4), p.476-483 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Background
The diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma is commonly performed by the measurements of plasma‐free normetanephrine and metanephrine. Plasma‐deconjugated normetanephrine and metanephrine have been proposed as alternative, equivalent, but easier to measure biomarkers.
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of plasma‐free vs deconjugated normetanephrine and metanephrine in patients tested for phaeochromocytoma.
Methods
The study population included a reference group of 262 normotensive and hypertensive volunteers, 198 patients with phaeochromocytoma and 528 patients initially suspected of having the tumour, but with negative investigations after at least 2 years of follow‐up. Measurements were performed using liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.
Results
Plasma concentrations of free normetanephrine were 17‐fold higher in patients with phaeochromocytoma than in the reference population, a 72% larger (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-0664 1365-2265 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cen.12191 |