Loading…

Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison

Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American midland naturalist 1986-01, Vol.115 (1), p.165-173
Main Authors: Congdon, Justin D., Greene, Judith L., Gibbons, J. Whitfield
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0
cites
container_end_page 173
container_issue 1
container_start_page 165
container_title The American midland naturalist
container_volume 115
creator Congdon, Justin D.
Greene, Judith L.
Gibbons, J. Whitfield
description Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana, P. scripta and Sternotherus odoratus. The species in Michigan were Chelydra serpentina, Chrysemys picta and Emydoidea blandingi. Biomass was also determined for a single species population of P. scripta on a barrier island near Charleston, South Carolina. Population density and biomass of Pseudemys scripta in Greene Pond on Capers Island were higher than densities and biomass of the entire six-species community studied on the mainland. In both the farm pond and marsh habitat in South Carolina P. scripta was the numerically dominant species and had the highest biomass. In Michigan, Chrysemys picta was the numerically dominant species; however, the biomass of Chelydra serpentina was higher. The three-species community in Michigan in two marshes (58 kg ha-1and 46 kg ha-1) and farm ponds (23 kg ha-1) had lower biomasses than did the six-species community in a South Carolina marsh (73 kg-1). Minimum annual egg production by all species in South Carolina averaged 1.93 kg ha-1and in Michigan averaged 2.89 kg ha-1of marsh.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2425846
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14318125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2425846</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2425846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DtPwzAQAGALgUQoiL-QAcEU8CuOw1YiWpAqsZQ5cp0zTZXUwZcK8e9rlK4Mp3vouxuOkFtGH7mgxROXPNdSnZGElUJnkgt9ThJKqchisEtyhbiLbSlLmRD10vreIKbepYsAuP0xI4R0fQhjB_icztMl-K9ghm1r08r3gwkt-v01uXCmQ7g55Rn5XLyuq7ds9bF8r-arzHIlx6x0nG-A56qwWudKWAWF3VDlLOW80ALikEcai8I1jSoNZXlDAQrFVFylM3I_3R2C_z4AjnXfooWuM3vwB6yZFEwznkf4MEEbPGIAVw-h7U34rRmt__5Sn_4S5d0kdzj68C87Aho8Xec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14318125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison</title><creator>Congdon, Justin D. ; Greene, Judith L. ; Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creator><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Justin D. ; Greene, Judith L. ; Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creatorcontrib><description>Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana, P. scripta and Sternotherus odoratus. The species in Michigan were Chelydra serpentina, Chrysemys picta and Emydoidea blandingi. Biomass was also determined for a single species population of P. scripta on a barrier island near Charleston, South Carolina. Population density and biomass of Pseudemys scripta in Greene Pond on Capers Island were higher than densities and biomass of the entire six-species community studied on the mainland. In both the farm pond and marsh habitat in South Carolina P. scripta was the numerically dominant species and had the highest biomass. In Michigan, Chrysemys picta was the numerically dominant species; however, the biomass of Chelydra serpentina was higher. The three-species community in Michigan in two marshes (58 kg ha-1and 46 kg ha-1) and farm ponds (23 kg ha-1) had lower biomasses than did the six-species community in a South Carolina marsh (73 kg-1). Minimum annual egg production by all species in South Carolina averaged 1.93 kg ha-1and in Michigan averaged 2.89 kg ha-1of marsh.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2425846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Notre Dame</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Biomass ; Biomass production ; Eggs ; Freshwater ; Habitats ; Ponds ; Population density ; Population estimates ; Turtles ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>The American midland naturalist, 1986-01, Vol.115 (1), p.165-173</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 American Midland Naturalist</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creatorcontrib><title>Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison</title><title>The American midland naturalist</title><description>Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana, P. scripta and Sternotherus odoratus. The species in Michigan were Chelydra serpentina, Chrysemys picta and Emydoidea blandingi. Biomass was also determined for a single species population of P. scripta on a barrier island near Charleston, South Carolina. Population density and biomass of Pseudemys scripta in Greene Pond on Capers Island were higher than densities and biomass of the entire six-species community studied on the mainland. In both the farm pond and marsh habitat in South Carolina P. scripta was the numerically dominant species and had the highest biomass. In Michigan, Chrysemys picta was the numerically dominant species; however, the biomass of Chelydra serpentina was higher. The three-species community in Michigan in two marshes (58 kg ha-1and 46 kg ha-1) and farm ponds (23 kg ha-1) had lower biomasses than did the six-species community in a South Carolina marsh (73 kg-1). Minimum annual egg production by all species in South Carolina averaged 1.93 kg ha-1and in Michigan averaged 2.89 kg ha-1of marsh.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass production</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0003-0031</issn><issn>1938-4238</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10DtPwzAQAGALgUQoiL-QAcEU8CuOw1YiWpAqsZQ5cp0zTZXUwZcK8e9rlK4Mp3vouxuOkFtGH7mgxROXPNdSnZGElUJnkgt9ThJKqchisEtyhbiLbSlLmRD10vreIKbepYsAuP0xI4R0fQhjB_icztMl-K9ghm1r08r3gwkt-v01uXCmQ7g55Rn5XLyuq7ds9bF8r-arzHIlx6x0nG-A56qwWudKWAWF3VDlLOW80ALikEcai8I1jSoNZXlDAQrFVFylM3I_3R2C_z4AjnXfooWuM3vwB6yZFEwznkf4MEEbPGIAVw-h7U34rRmt__5Sn_4S5d0kdzj68C87Aho8Xec</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Congdon, Justin D.</creator><creator>Greene, Judith L.</creator><creator>Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creator><general>University of Notre Dame</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison</title><author>Congdon, Justin D. ; Greene, Judith L. ; Gibbons, J. Whitfield</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass production</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Congdon, Justin D.</au><au>Greene, Judith L.</au><au>Gibbons, J. Whitfield</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison</atitle><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>165-173</pages><issn>0003-0031</issn><eissn>1938-4238</eissn><abstract>Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana, P. scripta and Sternotherus odoratus. The species in Michigan were Chelydra serpentina, Chrysemys picta and Emydoidea blandingi. Biomass was also determined for a single species population of P. scripta on a barrier island near Charleston, South Carolina. Population density and biomass of Pseudemys scripta in Greene Pond on Capers Island were higher than densities and biomass of the entire six-species community studied on the mainland. In both the farm pond and marsh habitat in South Carolina P. scripta was the numerically dominant species and had the highest biomass. In Michigan, Chrysemys picta was the numerically dominant species; however, the biomass of Chelydra serpentina was higher. The three-species community in Michigan in two marshes (58 kg ha-1and 46 kg ha-1) and farm ponds (23 kg ha-1) had lower biomasses than did the six-species community in a South Carolina marsh (73 kg-1). Minimum annual egg production by all species in South Carolina averaged 1.93 kg ha-1and in Michigan averaged 2.89 kg ha-1of marsh.</abstract><pub>University of Notre Dame</pub><doi>10.2307/2425846</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext no_fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0031
ispartof The American midland naturalist, 1986-01, Vol.115 (1), p.165-173
issn 0003-0031
1938-4238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14318125
source
subjects Aquatic habitats
Biomass
Biomass production
Eggs
Freshwater
Habitats
Ponds
Population density
Population estimates
Turtles
Wildlife habitats
title Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomass%20of%20Freshwater%20Turtles:%20A%20Geographic%20Comparison&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20midland%20naturalist&rft.au=Congdon,%20Justin%20D.&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=165-173&rft.issn=0003-0031&rft.eissn=1938-4238&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2425846&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2425846%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14318125&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2425846&rfr_iscdi=true