Loading…
Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison
Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American midland naturalist 1986-01, Vol.115 (1), p.165-173 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 173 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 165 |
container_title | The American midland naturalist |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | Congdon, Justin D. Greene, Judith L. Gibbons, J. Whitfield |
description | Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana, P. scripta and Sternotherus odoratus. The species in Michigan were Chelydra serpentina, Chrysemys picta and Emydoidea blandingi. Biomass was also determined for a single species population of P. scripta on a barrier island near Charleston, South Carolina. Population density and biomass of Pseudemys scripta in Greene Pond on Capers Island were higher than densities and biomass of the entire six-species community studied on the mainland. In both the farm pond and marsh habitat in South Carolina P. scripta was the numerically dominant species and had the highest biomass. In Michigan, Chrysemys picta was the numerically dominant species; however, the biomass of Chelydra serpentina was higher. The three-species community in Michigan in two marshes (58 kg ha-1and 46 kg ha-1) and farm ponds (23 kg ha-1) had lower biomasses than did the six-species community in a South Carolina marsh (73 kg-1). Minimum annual egg production by all species in South Carolina averaged 1.93 kg ha-1and in Michigan averaged 2.89 kg ha-1of marsh. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2425846 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14318125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2425846</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2425846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DtPwzAQAGALgUQoiL-QAcEU8CuOw1YiWpAqsZQ5cp0zTZXUwZcK8e9rlK4Mp3vouxuOkFtGH7mgxROXPNdSnZGElUJnkgt9ThJKqchisEtyhbiLbSlLmRD10vreIKbepYsAuP0xI4R0fQhjB_icztMl-K9ghm1r08r3gwkt-v01uXCmQ7g55Rn5XLyuq7ds9bF8r-arzHIlx6x0nG-A56qwWudKWAWF3VDlLOW80ALikEcai8I1jSoNZXlDAQrFVFylM3I_3R2C_z4AjnXfooWuM3vwB6yZFEwznkf4MEEbPGIAVw-h7U34rRmt__5Sn_4S5d0kdzj68C87Aho8Xec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14318125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison</title><creator>Congdon, Justin D. ; Greene, Judith L. ; Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creator><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Justin D. ; Greene, Judith L. ; Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creatorcontrib><description>Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana, P. scripta and Sternotherus odoratus. The species in Michigan were Chelydra serpentina, Chrysemys picta and Emydoidea blandingi. Biomass was also determined for a single species population of P. scripta on a barrier island near Charleston, South Carolina. Population density and biomass of Pseudemys scripta in Greene Pond on Capers Island were higher than densities and biomass of the entire six-species community studied on the mainland. In both the farm pond and marsh habitat in South Carolina P. scripta was the numerically dominant species and had the highest biomass. In Michigan, Chrysemys picta was the numerically dominant species; however, the biomass of Chelydra serpentina was higher. The three-species community in Michigan in two marshes (58 kg ha-1and 46 kg ha-1) and farm ponds (23 kg ha-1) had lower biomasses than did the six-species community in a South Carolina marsh (73 kg-1). Minimum annual egg production by all species in South Carolina averaged 1.93 kg ha-1and in Michigan averaged 2.89 kg ha-1of marsh.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2425846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Notre Dame</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Biomass ; Biomass production ; Eggs ; Freshwater ; Habitats ; Ponds ; Population density ; Population estimates ; Turtles ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>The American midland naturalist, 1986-01, Vol.115 (1), p.165-173</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 American Midland Naturalist</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creatorcontrib><title>Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison</title><title>The American midland naturalist</title><description>Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana, P. scripta and Sternotherus odoratus. The species in Michigan were Chelydra serpentina, Chrysemys picta and Emydoidea blandingi. Biomass was also determined for a single species population of P. scripta on a barrier island near Charleston, South Carolina. Population density and biomass of Pseudemys scripta in Greene Pond on Capers Island were higher than densities and biomass of the entire six-species community studied on the mainland. In both the farm pond and marsh habitat in South Carolina P. scripta was the numerically dominant species and had the highest biomass. In Michigan, Chrysemys picta was the numerically dominant species; however, the biomass of Chelydra serpentina was higher. The three-species community in Michigan in two marshes (58 kg ha-1and 46 kg ha-1) and farm ponds (23 kg ha-1) had lower biomasses than did the six-species community in a South Carolina marsh (73 kg-1). Minimum annual egg production by all species in South Carolina averaged 1.93 kg ha-1and in Michigan averaged 2.89 kg ha-1of marsh.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass production</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0003-0031</issn><issn>1938-4238</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10DtPwzAQAGALgUQoiL-QAcEU8CuOw1YiWpAqsZQ5cp0zTZXUwZcK8e9rlK4Mp3vouxuOkFtGH7mgxROXPNdSnZGElUJnkgt9ThJKqchisEtyhbiLbSlLmRD10vreIKbepYsAuP0xI4R0fQhjB_icztMl-K9ghm1r08r3gwkt-v01uXCmQ7g55Rn5XLyuq7ds9bF8r-arzHIlx6x0nG-A56qwWudKWAWF3VDlLOW80ALikEcai8I1jSoNZXlDAQrFVFylM3I_3R2C_z4AjnXfooWuM3vwB6yZFEwznkf4MEEbPGIAVw-h7U34rRmt__5Sn_4S5d0kdzj68C87Aho8Xec</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Congdon, Justin D.</creator><creator>Greene, Judith L.</creator><creator>Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creator><general>University of Notre Dame</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison</title><author>Congdon, Justin D. ; Greene, Judith L. ; Gibbons, J. Whitfield</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass production</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, J. Whitfield</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Congdon, Justin D.</au><au>Greene, Judith L.</au><au>Gibbons, J. Whitfield</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison</atitle><jtitle>The American midland naturalist</jtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>165-173</pages><issn>0003-0031</issn><eissn>1938-4238</eissn><abstract>Standing crop biomass of freshwater turtles and minimum annual biomass of egg production were calculated for marsh and farm pond habitats in South Carolina and in Michigan. The species in South Carolina included Chelydra serpentina, Deirochelys reticularia, Kinosternon subrubrum, Pseudemys floridana, P. scripta and Sternotherus odoratus. The species in Michigan were Chelydra serpentina, Chrysemys picta and Emydoidea blandingi. Biomass was also determined for a single species population of P. scripta on a barrier island near Charleston, South Carolina. Population density and biomass of Pseudemys scripta in Greene Pond on Capers Island were higher than densities and biomass of the entire six-species community studied on the mainland. In both the farm pond and marsh habitat in South Carolina P. scripta was the numerically dominant species and had the highest biomass. In Michigan, Chrysemys picta was the numerically dominant species; however, the biomass of Chelydra serpentina was higher. The three-species community in Michigan in two marshes (58 kg ha-1and 46 kg ha-1) and farm ponds (23 kg ha-1) had lower biomasses than did the six-species community in a South Carolina marsh (73 kg-1). Minimum annual egg production by all species in South Carolina averaged 1.93 kg ha-1and in Michigan averaged 2.89 kg ha-1of marsh.</abstract><pub>University of Notre Dame</pub><doi>10.2307/2425846</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | no_fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0031 |
ispartof | The American midland naturalist, 1986-01, Vol.115 (1), p.165-173 |
issn | 0003-0031 1938-4238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14318125 |
source | |
subjects | Aquatic habitats Biomass Biomass production Eggs Freshwater Habitats Ponds Population density Population estimates Turtles Wildlife habitats |
title | Biomass of Freshwater Turtles: A Geographic Comparison |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomass%20of%20Freshwater%20Turtles:%20A%20Geographic%20Comparison&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20midland%20naturalist&rft.au=Congdon,%20Justin%20D.&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=165-173&rft.issn=0003-0031&rft.eissn=1938-4238&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2425846&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2425846%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9f22be2567c88563c6e7cb06fc022783e8562c263e87fdd69a015d0ee761622b0%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14318125&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2425846&rfr_iscdi=true |