Loading…
The Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacoinvasive Therapy with Prourokinase for Acute ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients with Expected Long Percutaneous Coronary Intervention‐Related Delay
Summary Objectives To elucidate the efficacy and safety of pharmacoinvasive therapy by using prourokinase (prouk) in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Background Patients with STEMI often have long percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)‐related delays due to various...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cardiovascular therapeutics 2013-10, Vol.31 (5), p.285-290 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Summary
Objectives
To elucidate the efficacy and safety of pharmacoinvasive therapy by using prourokinase (prouk) in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Background
Patients with STEMI often have long percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)‐related delays due to various reasons, which are associated with poor outcomes.
Methods
A randomized study which enrolled patients from four centers in China was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to accept routine primary PCI or prouk‐PCI. The primary end points were the angiographic parameters, including thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, TIMI frame count, and myocardial blush grade. Secondary endpoints were incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as death from all causes, reinfarction, revascularization, or rehospitalization due to new or worsening congestive heart failure) at 30 days and 1 year.
Results
One hundred and ninety‐seven eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 100 were randomized to the prouk‐PCI group. Significantly more patients in the prouk‐PCI group than in the PCI group had an opened infarct‐related artery on arrival in the catheterization laboratory (48% vs. 21%, P = 0.0002) and better TIMI frame count after PCI (33 ± 6 vs. 40 ± 10, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-5914 1755-5922 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1755-5922.12020 |