Loading…
Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovenous Microwave Ablation Combined with High Ligation Versus Conventional Surgery for Varicose Veins
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) in treatment of varicose veins (VVS). Methods The patients were randomly divided into EMA and high ligation and stripping (HLS) groups. Clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surg...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2013-10, Vol.46 (4), p.473-479 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-8e2b88656643eb586faf8490355c9c15ac7d8eb6d799dc3d891b685194c67c093 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-8e2b88656643eb586faf8490355c9c15ac7d8eb6d799dc3d891b685194c67c093 |
container_end_page | 479 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 473 |
container_title | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Yang, L Wang, X.P Su, W.J Zhang, Y Wang, Y |
description | Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) in treatment of varicose veins (VVS). Methods The patients were randomly divided into EMA and high ligation and stripping (HLS) groups. Clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, and the effect on quality of life was also assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) respectively. Results EMA occluded VVS completely, with a shorter operative time, less bleeding and smaller incisions than the HLS procedure. In the EMA group, skin burns were found on 11 limbs (10.2%); sensory alteration and ecchymosis were less; and the recurrence rate of VVS was relatively lower compared with the HLS group. Both groups had significant improvement in VCSS and disease-specific quality of life (AVVQ) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in AVVQ and VCSS scores between the groups. Conclusion EMA is an effective new technique for the treatment of VVS, and had a more satisfactory clinical outcome than HLS in the short term. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1433266448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078588413004450</els_id><sourcerecordid>1433266448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-8e2b88656643eb586faf8490355c9c15ac7d8eb6d799dc3d891b685194c67c093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kkFv1DAUhCMEoqXwBzggH7kktWM7cSSEVEUtrbQIiZZeLcd52TokcbGTrZY7_5sX7cKBAxfbsucbaeY5Sd4ymjHKivM-g34Xs5wyntEyo1Q8S06Z5Hmas0I-xzMtVSqVEifJqxh7SqlkXL5MTnJeMVZycZr8-mqm1o_uJ7SkHtzkrBnIXXC4-o5c4tsOJr9E8tnZ4J_MDshFM5jZ-YnUfmzchOCTmx_Itds-kI3bHt7uIUSkaj8hv96g4e0SthD2pPOB3JvgrI-AQjfF18mLzgwR3hz3s-Tb1eVdfZ1uvny6qS82qRVSzqmCvFGqkEUhODRSFZ3plKgol9JWlkljy1ZBU7RlVbWWt6piTaEkq4QtSksrfpa8P_g-Bv9jgTjr0UULw2AmwJCaCc5zdBcKpflBirFjDNDpx-BGE_aaUb3Wr3u91q_X-jUtNdaP0Luj_9KM0P5F_vSNgg8HAWDKnYOgo3UwWWhdADvr1rv_-3_8B7fHmX2HPcTeLwGLxhw65prq2_UDrPNnHGkhKf8N5_qs1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433266448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovenous Microwave Ablation Combined with High Ligation Versus Conventional Surgery for Varicose Veins</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Yang, L ; Wang, X.P ; Su, W.J ; Zhang, Y ; Wang, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, L ; Wang, X.P ; Su, W.J ; Zhang, Y ; Wang, Y</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) in treatment of varicose veins (VVS). Methods The patients were randomly divided into EMA and high ligation and stripping (HLS) groups. Clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, and the effect on quality of life was also assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) respectively. Results EMA occluded VVS completely, with a shorter operative time, less bleeding and smaller incisions than the HLS procedure. In the EMA group, skin burns were found on 11 limbs (10.2%); sensory alteration and ecchymosis were less; and the recurrence rate of VVS was relatively lower compared with the HLS group. Both groups had significant improvement in VCSS and disease-specific quality of life (AVVQ) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in AVVQ and VCSS scores between the groups. Conclusion EMA is an effective new technique for the treatment of VVS, and had a more satisfactory clinical outcome than HLS in the short term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23911734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ablation Techniques - adverse effects ; Adult ; Aged ; China ; Endovenous microwave ablation ; Female ; High ligation and stripping ; Humans ; Ligation ; Male ; Microwaves - adverse effects ; Microwaves - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Quality of Life ; Recurrence ; Saphenous Vein - surgery ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Varicose vein ; Varicose Veins - diagnosis ; Varicose Veins - surgery ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2013-10, Vol.46 (4), p.473-479</ispartof><rights>European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-8e2b88656643eb586faf8490355c9c15ac7d8eb6d799dc3d891b685194c67c093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-8e2b88656643eb586faf8490355c9c15ac7d8eb6d799dc3d891b685194c67c093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23911734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, X.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovenous Microwave Ablation Combined with High Ligation Versus Conventional Surgery for Varicose Veins</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) in treatment of varicose veins (VVS). Methods The patients were randomly divided into EMA and high ligation and stripping (HLS) groups. Clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, and the effect on quality of life was also assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) respectively. Results EMA occluded VVS completely, with a shorter operative time, less bleeding and smaller incisions than the HLS procedure. In the EMA group, skin burns were found on 11 limbs (10.2%); sensory alteration and ecchymosis were less; and the recurrence rate of VVS was relatively lower compared with the HLS group. Both groups had significant improvement in VCSS and disease-specific quality of life (AVVQ) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in AVVQ and VCSS scores between the groups. Conclusion EMA is an effective new technique for the treatment of VVS, and had a more satisfactory clinical outcome than HLS in the short term.</description><subject>Ablation Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Endovenous microwave ablation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>High ligation and stripping</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microwaves - adverse effects</subject><subject>Microwaves - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Saphenous Vein - surgery</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Varicose vein</subject><subject>Varicose Veins - diagnosis</subject><subject>Varicose Veins - surgery</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kkFv1DAUhCMEoqXwBzggH7kktWM7cSSEVEUtrbQIiZZeLcd52TokcbGTrZY7_5sX7cKBAxfbsucbaeY5Sd4ymjHKivM-g34Xs5wyntEyo1Q8S06Z5Hmas0I-xzMtVSqVEifJqxh7SqlkXL5MTnJeMVZycZr8-mqm1o_uJ7SkHtzkrBnIXXC4-o5c4tsOJr9E8tnZ4J_MDshFM5jZ-YnUfmzchOCTmx_Itds-kI3bHt7uIUSkaj8hv96g4e0SthD2pPOB3JvgrI-AQjfF18mLzgwR3hz3s-Tb1eVdfZ1uvny6qS82qRVSzqmCvFGqkEUhODRSFZ3plKgol9JWlkljy1ZBU7RlVbWWt6piTaEkq4QtSksrfpa8P_g-Bv9jgTjr0UULw2AmwJCaCc5zdBcKpflBirFjDNDpx-BGE_aaUb3Wr3u91q_X-jUtNdaP0Luj_9KM0P5F_vSNgg8HAWDKnYOgo3UwWWhdADvr1rv_-3_8B7fHmX2HPcTeLwGLxhw65prq2_UDrPNnHGkhKf8N5_qs1w</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Yang, L</creator><creator>Wang, X.P</creator><creator>Su, W.J</creator><creator>Zhang, Y</creator><creator>Wang, Y</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovenous Microwave Ablation Combined with High Ligation Versus Conventional Surgery for Varicose Veins</title><author>Yang, L ; Wang, X.P ; Su, W.J ; Zhang, Y ; Wang, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-8e2b88656643eb586faf8490355c9c15ac7d8eb6d799dc3d891b685194c67c093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Ablation Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Endovenous microwave ablation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>High ligation and stripping</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microwaves - adverse effects</topic><topic>Microwaves - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Saphenous Vein - surgery</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Varicose vein</topic><topic>Varicose Veins - diagnosis</topic><topic>Varicose Veins - surgery</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, X.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, L</au><au>Wang, X.P</au><au>Su, W.J</au><au>Zhang, Y</au><au>Wang, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovenous Microwave Ablation Combined with High Ligation Versus Conventional Surgery for Varicose Veins</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>479</epage><pages>473-479</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) in treatment of varicose veins (VVS). Methods The patients were randomly divided into EMA and high ligation and stripping (HLS) groups. Clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, and the effect on quality of life was also assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) respectively. Results EMA occluded VVS completely, with a shorter operative time, less bleeding and smaller incisions than the HLS procedure. In the EMA group, skin burns were found on 11 limbs (10.2%); sensory alteration and ecchymosis were less; and the recurrence rate of VVS was relatively lower compared with the HLS group. Both groups had significant improvement in VCSS and disease-specific quality of life (AVVQ) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in AVVQ and VCSS scores between the groups. Conclusion EMA is an effective new technique for the treatment of VVS, and had a more satisfactory clinical outcome than HLS in the short term.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23911734</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-5884 |
ispartof | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2013-10, Vol.46 (4), p.473-479 |
issn | 1078-5884 1532-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1433266448 |
source | Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Ablation Techniques - adverse effects Adult Aged China Endovenous microwave ablation Female High ligation and stripping Humans Ligation Male Microwaves - adverse effects Microwaves - therapeutic use Middle Aged Quality of Life Recurrence Saphenous Vein - surgery Severity of Illness Index Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires Time Factors Treatment Outcome Ultrasonography, Interventional Varicose vein Varicose Veins - diagnosis Varicose Veins - surgery Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects |
title | Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovenous Microwave Ablation Combined with High Ligation Versus Conventional Surgery for Varicose Veins |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A25%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial%20of%20Endovenous%20Microwave%20Ablation%20Combined%20with%20High%20Ligation%20Versus%20Conventional%20Surgery%20for%20Varicose%20Veins&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Yang,%20L&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=479&rft.pages=473-479&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1433266448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-8e2b88656643eb586faf8490355c9c15ac7d8eb6d799dc3d891b685194c67c093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433266448&rft_id=info:pmid/23911734&rfr_iscdi=true |