Loading…

Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors

We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water science and technology 1992-01, Vol.26 (3/4), p.847-856
Main Authors: In, S.J, Fukui, M, Suwa, Y, Yamagishi, T, Urushigawa, Y, Mori, T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13
cites
container_end_page 856
container_issue 3/4
container_start_page 847
container_title Water science and technology
container_volume 26
creator In, S.J
Fukui, M
Suwa, Y
Yamagishi, T
Urushigawa, Y
Mori, T
description We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more effective than 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES, 0-200 mM). Hydrogen, acetate and propionate were linearly accumulated when the methanogenesis was inhibited by 0.1% of chloroform. The propionate accumulation rate in the presence of chloroform was identical with that in the presence of high partial pressure of hydrogen (H2:CO2 = 20:80) which inhibits syntrophic H2- producing fatty-acids-oxidizing bacteria. This shows that the methanogens utilized hydrogen and acetate converted by syntrophic hydrogen-producing propionate-oxidizing bacteria through interspecies hydrogen transfer. Using chloroform (0.1%) as the specific inhibitor, in the LD sludge 49% of methane was estimated to be derived from propionate. The H2 + CO2 and acetate from the other pathway (NS), contributed 2 and 34% of the methanogenesis, respectively. This method was also applied to a municipal sewage digester sludge (MD). In the MD sludge, methanogenesis from propionate, H2 + CO2 and acetate via the NS pathway were 16, 2 and 78%, respectively. Major substrates for methanogenesis, therefore, could be estimated in anaerobic sludges.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wst.1992.0465
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14333172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13703417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cFq3DAQBmBRUuhmk2PPNRRy82aksSXruISkDQRySAK9CVkrbRS81lZjU_L2kdmeeulphuFjGOZn7CuHjeBSXv-hacO1FhtoZPuJrUova61QnLEVCIU1FwK_sHOiNwBQ2MCK_dqOdninSFUKFc09TdlOnqqQcnXw06sd096PfgFxrOxofU59dBUN825f3Exx3Fd09C6GMo7ja-zjlDJdsM_BDuQv_9Y1e7m7fb75WT88_ri_2T7UDhs91T30SgUPCEE57lyw3KJ2YieV7IQIuuWdRCkFdqDK_VK0O9XtoO2d1hA4rtnVae8xp9-zp8kcIjk_DHb0aSbDG0TkSvwfogJsuCrw-z_wLc25vKkY3aBoBG_aouqTcjkRZR_MMceDze-Gg1niMCUOs8RhljiK_3bywSZj9zmSeXkSwBG46gC7Dj8ANjWGog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943242145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>In, S.J ; Fukui, M ; Suwa, Y ; Yamagishi, T ; Urushigawa, Y ; Mori, T</creator><creatorcontrib>In, S.J ; Fukui, M ; Suwa, Y ; Yamagishi, T ; Urushigawa, Y ; Mori, T</creatorcontrib><description>We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more effective than 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES, 0-200 mM). Hydrogen, acetate and propionate were linearly accumulated when the methanogenesis was inhibited by 0.1% of chloroform. The propionate accumulation rate in the presence of chloroform was identical with that in the presence of high partial pressure of hydrogen (H2:CO2 = 20:80) which inhibits syntrophic H2- producing fatty-acids-oxidizing bacteria. This shows that the methanogens utilized hydrogen and acetate converted by syntrophic hydrogen-producing propionate-oxidizing bacteria through interspecies hydrogen transfer. Using chloroform (0.1%) as the specific inhibitor, in the LD sludge 49% of methane was estimated to be derived from propionate. The H2 + CO2 and acetate from the other pathway (NS), contributed 2 and 34% of the methanogenesis, respectively. This method was also applied to a municipal sewage digester sludge (MD). In the MD sludge, methanogenesis from propionate, H2 + CO2 and acetate via the NS pathway were 16, 2 and 78%, respectively. Major substrates for methanogenesis, therefore, could be estimated in anaerobic sludges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.1992.0465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Acetates ; Acetic acid ; anaerobic treatment ; Bacteria ; Carbon dioxide ; Chloroform ; Hydrogen ; Inhibitors ; methane ; methane production ; Methanogenesis ; Methanogenic bacteria ; Municipal wastes ; Municipal wastewater ; Oxidation ; Partial pressure ; Propionic acid ; Sewage ; Sludge ; Sludge digestion ; sludges ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 1992-01, Vol.26 (3/4), p.847-856</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Aug 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>In, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwa, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urushigawa, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, T</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more effective than 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES, 0-200 mM). Hydrogen, acetate and propionate were linearly accumulated when the methanogenesis was inhibited by 0.1% of chloroform. The propionate accumulation rate in the presence of chloroform was identical with that in the presence of high partial pressure of hydrogen (H2:CO2 = 20:80) which inhibits syntrophic H2- producing fatty-acids-oxidizing bacteria. This shows that the methanogens utilized hydrogen and acetate converted by syntrophic hydrogen-producing propionate-oxidizing bacteria through interspecies hydrogen transfer. Using chloroform (0.1%) as the specific inhibitor, in the LD sludge 49% of methane was estimated to be derived from propionate. The H2 + CO2 and acetate from the other pathway (NS), contributed 2 and 34% of the methanogenesis, respectively. This method was also applied to a municipal sewage digester sludge (MD). In the MD sludge, methanogenesis from propionate, H2 + CO2 and acetate via the NS pathway were 16, 2 and 78%, respectively. Major substrates for methanogenesis, therefore, could be estimated in anaerobic sludges.</description><subject>Acetates</subject><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>anaerobic treatment</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Chloroform</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>methane</subject><subject>methane production</subject><subject>Methanogenesis</subject><subject>Methanogenic bacteria</subject><subject>Municipal wastes</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Partial pressure</subject><subject>Propionic acid</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sludge digestion</subject><subject>sludges</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0cFq3DAQBmBRUuhmk2PPNRRy82aksSXruISkDQRySAK9CVkrbRS81lZjU_L2kdmeeulphuFjGOZn7CuHjeBSXv-hacO1FhtoZPuJrUova61QnLEVCIU1FwK_sHOiNwBQ2MCK_dqOdninSFUKFc09TdlOnqqQcnXw06sd096PfgFxrOxofU59dBUN825f3Exx3Fd09C6GMo7ja-zjlDJdsM_BDuQv_9Y1e7m7fb75WT88_ri_2T7UDhs91T30SgUPCEE57lyw3KJ2YieV7IQIuuWdRCkFdqDK_VK0O9XtoO2d1hA4rtnVae8xp9-zp8kcIjk_DHb0aSbDG0TkSvwfogJsuCrw-z_wLc25vKkY3aBoBG_aouqTcjkRZR_MMceDze-Gg1niMCUOs8RhljiK_3bywSZj9zmSeXkSwBG46gC7Dj8ANjWGog</recordid><startdate>19920101</startdate><enddate>19920101</enddate><creator>In, S.J</creator><creator>Fukui, M</creator><creator>Suwa, Y</creator><creator>Yamagishi, T</creator><creator>Urushigawa, Y</creator><creator>Mori, T</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920101</creationdate><title>Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors</title><author>In, S.J ; Fukui, M ; Suwa, Y ; Yamagishi, T ; Urushigawa, Y ; Mori, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Acetates</topic><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>anaerobic treatment</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Chloroform</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>methane</topic><topic>methane production</topic><topic>Methanogenesis</topic><topic>Methanogenic bacteria</topic><topic>Municipal wastes</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Partial pressure</topic><topic>Propionic acid</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sludge digestion</topic><topic>sludges</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>In, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwa, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urushigawa, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>In, S.J</au><au>Fukui, M</au><au>Suwa, Y</au><au>Yamagishi, T</au><au>Urushigawa, Y</au><au>Mori, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>1992-01-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>856</epage><pages>847-856</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more effective than 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES, 0-200 mM). Hydrogen, acetate and propionate were linearly accumulated when the methanogenesis was inhibited by 0.1% of chloroform. The propionate accumulation rate in the presence of chloroform was identical with that in the presence of high partial pressure of hydrogen (H2:CO2 = 20:80) which inhibits syntrophic H2- producing fatty-acids-oxidizing bacteria. This shows that the methanogens utilized hydrogen and acetate converted by syntrophic hydrogen-producing propionate-oxidizing bacteria through interspecies hydrogen transfer. Using chloroform (0.1%) as the specific inhibitor, in the LD sludge 49% of methane was estimated to be derived from propionate. The H2 + CO2 and acetate from the other pathway (NS), contributed 2 and 34% of the methanogenesis, respectively. This method was also applied to a municipal sewage digester sludge (MD). In the MD sludge, methanogenesis from propionate, H2 + CO2 and acetate via the NS pathway were 16, 2 and 78%, respectively. Major substrates for methanogenesis, therefore, could be estimated in anaerobic sludges.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wst.1992.0465</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1223
ispartof Water science and technology, 1992-01, Vol.26 (3/4), p.847-856
issn 0273-1223
1996-9732
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14333172
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acetates
Acetic acid
anaerobic treatment
Bacteria
Carbon dioxide
Chloroform
Hydrogen
Inhibitors
methane
methane production
Methanogenesis
Methanogenic bacteria
Municipal wastes
Municipal wastewater
Oxidation
Partial pressure
Propionic acid
Sewage
Sludge
Sludge digestion
sludges
Substrates
title Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A14%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20substrates%20for%20methanogenesis%20in%20anaerobic%20sludges%20using%20specific%20inhibitors&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=In,%20S.J&rft.date=1992-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=856&rft.pages=847-856&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.1992.0465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E13703417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943242145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true