Loading…
Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors
We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water science and technology 1992-01, Vol.26 (3/4), p.847-856 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 856 |
container_issue | 3/4 |
container_start_page | 847 |
container_title | Water science and technology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | In, S.J Fukui, M Suwa, Y Yamagishi, T Urushigawa, Y Mori, T |
description | We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more effective than 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES, 0-200 mM). Hydrogen, acetate and propionate were linearly accumulated when the methanogenesis was inhibited by 0.1% of chloroform. The propionate accumulation rate in the presence of chloroform was identical with that in the presence of high partial pressure of hydrogen (H2:CO2 = 20:80) which inhibits syntrophic H2- producing fatty-acids-oxidizing bacteria. This shows that the methanogens utilized hydrogen and acetate converted by syntrophic hydrogen-producing propionate-oxidizing bacteria through interspecies hydrogen transfer. Using chloroform (0.1%) as the specific inhibitor, in the LD sludge 49% of methane was estimated to be derived from propionate. The H2 + CO2 and acetate from the other pathway (NS), contributed 2 and 34% of the methanogenesis, respectively. This method was also applied to a municipal sewage digester sludge (MD). In the MD sludge, methanogenesis from propionate, H2 + CO2 and acetate via the NS pathway were 16, 2 and 78%, respectively. Major substrates for methanogenesis, therefore, could be estimated in anaerobic sludges. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.1992.0465 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14333172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13703417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cFq3DAQBmBRUuhmk2PPNRRy82aksSXruISkDQRySAK9CVkrbRS81lZjU_L2kdmeeulphuFjGOZn7CuHjeBSXv-hacO1FhtoZPuJrUova61QnLEVCIU1FwK_sHOiNwBQ2MCK_dqOdninSFUKFc09TdlOnqqQcnXw06sd096PfgFxrOxofU59dBUN825f3Exx3Fd09C6GMo7ja-zjlDJdsM_BDuQv_9Y1e7m7fb75WT88_ri_2T7UDhs91T30SgUPCEE57lyw3KJ2YieV7IQIuuWdRCkFdqDK_VK0O9XtoO2d1hA4rtnVae8xp9-zp8kcIjk_DHb0aSbDG0TkSvwfogJsuCrw-z_wLc25vKkY3aBoBG_aouqTcjkRZR_MMceDze-Gg1niMCUOs8RhljiK_3bywSZj9zmSeXkSwBG46gC7Dj8ANjWGog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943242145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>In, S.J ; Fukui, M ; Suwa, Y ; Yamagishi, T ; Urushigawa, Y ; Mori, T</creator><creatorcontrib>In, S.J ; Fukui, M ; Suwa, Y ; Yamagishi, T ; Urushigawa, Y ; Mori, T</creatorcontrib><description>We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more effective than 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES, 0-200 mM). Hydrogen, acetate and propionate were linearly accumulated when the methanogenesis was inhibited by 0.1% of chloroform. The propionate accumulation rate in the presence of chloroform was identical with that in the presence of high partial pressure of hydrogen (H2:CO2 = 20:80) which inhibits syntrophic H2- producing fatty-acids-oxidizing bacteria. This shows that the methanogens utilized hydrogen and acetate converted by syntrophic hydrogen-producing propionate-oxidizing bacteria through interspecies hydrogen transfer. Using chloroform (0.1%) as the specific inhibitor, in the LD sludge 49% of methane was estimated to be derived from propionate. The H2 + CO2 and acetate from the other pathway (NS), contributed 2 and 34% of the methanogenesis, respectively. This method was also applied to a municipal sewage digester sludge (MD). In the MD sludge, methanogenesis from propionate, H2 + CO2 and acetate via the NS pathway were 16, 2 and 78%, respectively. Major substrates for methanogenesis, therefore, could be estimated in anaerobic sludges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.1992.0465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Acetates ; Acetic acid ; anaerobic treatment ; Bacteria ; Carbon dioxide ; Chloroform ; Hydrogen ; Inhibitors ; methane ; methane production ; Methanogenesis ; Methanogenic bacteria ; Municipal wastes ; Municipal wastewater ; Oxidation ; Partial pressure ; Propionic acid ; Sewage ; Sludge ; Sludge digestion ; sludges ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 1992-01, Vol.26 (3/4), p.847-856</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Aug 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>In, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwa, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urushigawa, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, T</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more effective than 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES, 0-200 mM). Hydrogen, acetate and propionate were linearly accumulated when the methanogenesis was inhibited by 0.1% of chloroform. The propionate accumulation rate in the presence of chloroform was identical with that in the presence of high partial pressure of hydrogen (H2:CO2 = 20:80) which inhibits syntrophic H2- producing fatty-acids-oxidizing bacteria. This shows that the methanogens utilized hydrogen and acetate converted by syntrophic hydrogen-producing propionate-oxidizing bacteria through interspecies hydrogen transfer. Using chloroform (0.1%) as the specific inhibitor, in the LD sludge 49% of methane was estimated to be derived from propionate. The H2 + CO2 and acetate from the other pathway (NS), contributed 2 and 34% of the methanogenesis, respectively. This method was also applied to a municipal sewage digester sludge (MD). In the MD sludge, methanogenesis from propionate, H2 + CO2 and acetate via the NS pathway were 16, 2 and 78%, respectively. Major substrates for methanogenesis, therefore, could be estimated in anaerobic sludges.</description><subject>Acetates</subject><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>anaerobic treatment</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Chloroform</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>methane</subject><subject>methane production</subject><subject>Methanogenesis</subject><subject>Methanogenic bacteria</subject><subject>Municipal wastes</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Partial pressure</subject><subject>Propionic acid</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sludge digestion</subject><subject>sludges</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0cFq3DAQBmBRUuhmk2PPNRRy82aksSXruISkDQRySAK9CVkrbRS81lZjU_L2kdmeeulphuFjGOZn7CuHjeBSXv-hacO1FhtoZPuJrUova61QnLEVCIU1FwK_sHOiNwBQ2MCK_dqOdninSFUKFc09TdlOnqqQcnXw06sd096PfgFxrOxofU59dBUN825f3Exx3Fd09C6GMo7ja-zjlDJdsM_BDuQv_9Y1e7m7fb75WT88_ri_2T7UDhs91T30SgUPCEE57lyw3KJ2YieV7IQIuuWdRCkFdqDK_VK0O9XtoO2d1hA4rtnVae8xp9-zp8kcIjk_DHb0aSbDG0TkSvwfogJsuCrw-z_wLc25vKkY3aBoBG_aouqTcjkRZR_MMceDze-Gg1niMCUOs8RhljiK_3bywSZj9zmSeXkSwBG46gC7Dj8ANjWGog</recordid><startdate>19920101</startdate><enddate>19920101</enddate><creator>In, S.J</creator><creator>Fukui, M</creator><creator>Suwa, Y</creator><creator>Yamagishi, T</creator><creator>Urushigawa, Y</creator><creator>Mori, T</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920101</creationdate><title>Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors</title><author>In, S.J ; Fukui, M ; Suwa, Y ; Yamagishi, T ; Urushigawa, Y ; Mori, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Acetates</topic><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>anaerobic treatment</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Chloroform</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>methane</topic><topic>methane production</topic><topic>Methanogenesis</topic><topic>Methanogenic bacteria</topic><topic>Municipal wastes</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Partial pressure</topic><topic>Propionic acid</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sludge digestion</topic><topic>sludges</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>In, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suwa, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagishi, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urushigawa, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>In, S.J</au><au>Fukui, M</au><au>Suwa, Y</au><au>Yamagishi, T</au><au>Urushigawa, Y</au><au>Mori, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>1992-01-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>847</spage><epage>856</epage><pages>847-856</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>We examined what kind and how much of the specific inhibitor is effective for the estimation availabilities of substrates for methanogens in anaerobic sludges. The chloroform (0.1%, v/v) inhibited 90% of the methanogenesis in an anaerobic sludge (LD), which was cultivated with glucose, and was more effective than 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid (BES, 0-200 mM). Hydrogen, acetate and propionate were linearly accumulated when the methanogenesis was inhibited by 0.1% of chloroform. The propionate accumulation rate in the presence of chloroform was identical with that in the presence of high partial pressure of hydrogen (H2:CO2 = 20:80) which inhibits syntrophic H2- producing fatty-acids-oxidizing bacteria. This shows that the methanogens utilized hydrogen and acetate converted by syntrophic hydrogen-producing propionate-oxidizing bacteria through interspecies hydrogen transfer. Using chloroform (0.1%) as the specific inhibitor, in the LD sludge 49% of methane was estimated to be derived from propionate. The H2 + CO2 and acetate from the other pathway (NS), contributed 2 and 34% of the methanogenesis, respectively. This method was also applied to a municipal sewage digester sludge (MD). In the MD sludge, methanogenesis from propionate, H2 + CO2 and acetate via the NS pathway were 16, 2 and 78%, respectively. Major substrates for methanogenesis, therefore, could be estimated in anaerobic sludges.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wst.1992.0465</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
ispartof | Water science and technology, 1992-01, Vol.26 (3/4), p.847-856 |
issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14333172 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acetates Acetic acid anaerobic treatment Bacteria Carbon dioxide Chloroform Hydrogen Inhibitors methane methane production Methanogenesis Methanogenic bacteria Municipal wastes Municipal wastewater Oxidation Partial pressure Propionic acid Sewage Sludge Sludge digestion sludges Substrates |
title | Analysis of substrates for methanogenesis in anaerobic sludges using specific inhibitors |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A14%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20substrates%20for%20methanogenesis%20in%20anaerobic%20sludges%20using%20specific%20inhibitors&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=In,%20S.J&rft.date=1992-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=847&rft.epage=856&rft.pages=847-856&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.1992.0465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E13703417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-b0b77fe030f7c1ccfa1a39c2d676822f9518636623807122625d78d05bc990f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943242145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |