How consistent are trait data between sources? A quantitative assessment

The use of species' traits is increasing in ecological research. Many studies obtain trait data from a single source, implicitly assuming the accuracy of these data. I critically evaluate this assumption by measuring agreement among sources for trait data. I evaluate inter-source agreement for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oikos 2013-09, Vol.122 (9), p.1350-1356
Main Author: Fitzsimmons, Jay M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Data analysis
Ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of species' traits is increasing in ecological research. Many studies obtain trait data from a single source, implicitly assuming the accuracy of these data. I critically evaluate this assumption by measuring agreement among sources for trait data. I evaluate inter-source agreement for 22 traits (anatomical, behavioural, life-history and niche-related) among five authoritative data sources (two field guides, two atlases and one online resource) for 263 Canadian butterfly species. This represents the first quantitative comparison of trait data among field guides or atlases. Traits varied considerably in their agreement among sources. Some traits such as wingspan and overwinter stage were fairly consistent among sources, whereas other traits such as habitat breadth were remarkably inconsistent among sources. These findings call into question the reliability of research that relies on a single source for trait data. I offer several recommendations for how trait researchers can account for inter-source variation in trait data.
ISSN:0030-1299
1600-0706
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00207.x